Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
I have investigated the problem and have found out, that the geronimo-server itself works nicely. When I access it directly via port 8080, there are no problems at all. In my (test) environment I'm accessing geronimo via apace ajp as reverse proxy; in this case, the complete left menu is not

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Forrest Xia
Try this config in your apache httpd.conf: LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so IfModule mod_proxy.c ProxyPass /console ajp://localhost:8009/console ProxyPass /dojo ajp://localhost:8009/dojo ProxyPassReverse / ajp://localhost:8009/

Re: Documentation update status for Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread chi runhua
Hi Devs, just want you to know that G2.2.1 doc items have been updated except for the release-notes.txt file. Anyone who is interested in those topics would help with the review work. Any topics that is missing from the table, please let me know or feel free to append the list. Cheers~! Jeff

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
I have been using this configuration, which worked nicely for many geronimo versions now. The section /dojo/ has been added today. Proxy balancer://g-backend BalancerMember ajp://127.0.0.1:8009 /Proxy ProxyPass /console/

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Forrest Xia
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Johannes Weberhofer jweberho...@weberhofer.at wrote: I have been using this configuration, which worked nicely for many geronimo versions now. The section /dojo/ has been added today. Proxy balancer://g-backend BalancerMember

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Strange; It's working suddenly - I don't know, what has changed. I'd like to deploy an application, now. As I must re-compile it: Is there any pre-built Eclipse plug-in for 2.2.1 available, as the link http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/updates on

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Shawn Jiang
Dev tool depends on server artifacts. We have to do the dev tools release after the server release. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Johannes Weberhofer jweberho...@weberhofer.at wrote: Strange; It's working suddenly - I don't know, what has changed. I'd like to deploy an application, now. As

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5600) Reenable EJB server admin console portlets

2010-12-09 Thread Shenghao Fang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shenghao Fang updated GERONIMO-5600: Attachment: GERONIMO-5600.patch The patch has been created. Please help to review. Only

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Ok. So I can not rebuild my application for the moment? I get: org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException: Missing dependency: org.apache.geronimo.javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.7/jar Am 09.12.10 10:51, schrieb Shawn Jiang: Dev tool depends on server artifacts.

Re: ordering tck failures in geronimo

2010-12-09 Thread Jakob Korherr
Hi, I called it ugly, because of its implementation code in DefaultFacesConfigurationProvider: The method is already inside of a FacesConfigurationProvider, but it does this: FacesConfigurationProvider provider = FacesConfigurationProviderFactory.

Re: activemq-jetty-server

2010-12-09 Thread Rick McGuire
On 12/8/2010 6:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: The intention was to only use reference: urls during the build. Can you provide the exact sequence of steps you use to get to this error? It seems possible that trying to run the unpacked server assembled in the target dir might have some bundles

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1043854

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1043854 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209 [INFO] BUILD

Re: ordering tck failures in geronimo

2010-12-09 Thread Jakob Korherr
Hi guys, I just uploaded a patch for a FacesConfigurationMerger SPI: MYFACES-2945-FacesConfigurationMerger.patch Furthermore I added a quick code sample as comment on the MYFACES-2945 issue about how Geronimo can use this new SPI. Please take a look at the patch and if there are no objections,

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Trygve Sanne Hardersen
Hi Maybe JETTY-1308 is related to the AJP problems? Not sure, but seems to me like Jetty 7.2.1 is affected. Jetty 7.2.2 with a fix from r2589 has been tagged, but AFAICT it's not available in the central Maven repo yet. Trygve On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Johannes Weberhofer

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Hi Trygve, I don't think the JETTY-1308 is related, because I've worked with the tomcat version. And only the left-hand menu was not visible. I can no longer reproduce the problem, I have tried with new installation etc. As I'm currently not able to build and test our software-product for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Shawn Jiang
There's still chance to get your +1. javamail in Geronimo 2.2.1 was upgraded to 1.8.2. Could you upgrade the javamail version in your app and then try to build it again ? dependency groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.javamail/groupId

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Hey Johannes, I built my app against G 2.1 using the eclipse plugin - then deployed it on G 2.2. Are you specifically calling for versions of your dependencies? Have you tried building as if you were going to deploy to a 2.1 server and then deployed onto 2.2? Jay On 12/09/2010 08:14 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Ok. I've removed the strict version numbers from the dependencies, so everything runs nicely now. Here is my +1 --- I have also found the reason why I sometimes did not see the menu at the left hand: When you log in to /console/portal/welcome (which was the default location in previeous

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1043971

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1043971 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 1043844

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1043844 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20101209/build-0200.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20101209/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1044074

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101209/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101209/unit-test-reports ibiblio.org (http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy/), apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1044115

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1044115 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1044185

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1044185 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101209/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101209/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1

2010-12-09 Thread Shawn Jiang
Thanks Johannes, we'll improve this[1] in the next release. [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5729 On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Johannes Weberhofer jweberho...@weberhofer.at wrote: Ok. I've removed the strict version numbers from the dependencies, so everything runs nicely

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5729) Access the wrong web console page should get appropriate error message

2010-12-09 Thread Shawn Jiang (JIRA)
Access the wrong web console page should get appropriate error message -- Key: GERONIMO-5729 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5729 Project: Geronimo

[Result] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.7

2010-12-09 Thread han hongfang
Hi devs, The vote to release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.7 passes with 3 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting +1 were Rex Wang Forrest Xia Shawn Jiang The artifacts and eclipse update site will be promoted soon. Thanks all for your time of review and vote. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:21 PM,

Re: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.7 RC1

2010-12-09 Thread han hongfang
Hi all, The vote is closed after opened for 72 hours. The result is posted as well. Thank you all for your review. Best regards, Han Hong Fang (Janet) hanhongfang AT apache.org

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1044198

2010-12-09 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1044198 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101209 [INFO] BUILD