Aaron -- it is fixed there too.
Thanks,
Gianny
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Gianny -- it looks like you fixed trunk. Is this a problem in the 1.0
branch as well? If so, could you fix it there too?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 2/9/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason,
This has now been
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/2/15, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I also think that we should call m2 from m1 and avoid to maintain a dual
build during the migration. As pointed out by Dain, we could easily call
m2 from m1 by redefining the clean and build goals of m1 to invoke m2
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Basically, this is how I see a migration module by module working:
1. take one module;
2. write its pom.xml;
3. remove from its project.xml all the external dependencies, i.e.
the non Geronimo dependencies (they are no more required
Hi,
The second solution has been implemented.
When starting G, it is now possible to specify one of these two system
properties:
* org.apache.geronimo.server.name: name of the server to be started. If
server1 is specified, then G will use the directory geronimo
installation dir/server1; or
*
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
snip
Here's the snippet of the test report:
$ more
modules/kernel/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.gbean.GBeanNameTest.txt
...
java.net.MalformedURLException: no protocol: and
at java.net.URL.init(URL.java:537)
at
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/2/20, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As a work-around, I have committed the reset of the RMI code base
property prior to use MarshalledObject.
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for the help! It doesn't work for me, though :(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/c/oss/geronimo
the binary
distribution creates the the first instance during the build and that
users need to create the additional instances manually for now..
Thanks
-Dave-
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
The second solution has been implemented.
When starting G, it is now possible to specify one of these two
Congrats Hernan! Many thanks for your hard work on the docos.
Gianny
Bruce Snyder wrote:
In recognition of his contributions, the Geronimo PMC has extended an
offer of committer karma to Hernan Cunico and he has accepted. Please
welcome me in congratulating Hernan for his contributions thus
Hi,
I think that we need to split ModuleBuilder.addGBeans into two methods:
addGBeans and initENC. addGBeans implementations perform GBean
registrations as per the current approach. initENC is invoked after the
addGBeans phase and implementations use this callback to build the ENC.
The
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:27 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I think that we need to split ModuleBuilder.addGBeans into two
methods: addGBeans and initENC. addGBeans
.
In Tomcat:
home = the installation directory
base = the base directory used for resolving dynamic portions of the
Tomcat installation (defaults to home if not set)
John
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
This change adds the ability to start multiple server instances
against the same bin, config
On 07/12/2006, at 11:10 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
We are now down to just 2 failures and 2 errors on the Openejb-2.3
itests. The stack trace is here -- http://rifers.org/paste/show/
2622
org.apache.openejb.test.TestFailureException :
.
Please apply the patch in -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-402
We are now down to just 2 errors !
Thanx
Prasad
On 12/7/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CMRMappingTests.testOneToManyDoNotSetCMR Time elapsed: 0.26 sec
ERROR!
org.apache.openejb.test.TestFailureException
Hi Anita,
I added this entry as it is expected as an endorsed library by the
geronimo-boilerplate-minimal assembly. Without it, I cannot build
this assembly. Are you saying that without it, you can successfully
build this assembly?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 08/12/2006, at 2:57 AM, anita
1.2 has been patched.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/12/2006, at 11:37 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Do we need this fix in branches\1.2 too?
--vamsi
On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author:
gdamour
Date: Wed Dec 6 03:11:05 2006
New Revision: 483034
URL:
Hi,
I am quickly scanning this commit and I would like to know if it was
not a little bit less intrusive to keep the existing addOperation and
search for the return type of the added operations against the target
gbeanType. This way, developers do not need to specify the return
type of
Hi,
I am trying to debug a couple of test-ejbcontainer itests and the
test-ejbcontainer itests seem to be broken (I was able to run them on
Friday last week) as the org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-corba-yoko/
2.0-SNAPSHOT/car configuration cannot be started due to the following
reason:
i cannot believe it: I built openejb2 yesterday prior to ci the
TranQL updates and it worked. I just check once again and it still
work. After carefully paying attention to Maven's output, I can see
that only 23 tests are executed in openejb-builder! And obviously
none of the CMP tests are
+1
And many thanks for the hard work on this release!
Gianny
On 15/12/2006, at 4:37 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The 1.2-beta release and all dependencies are cut and awaiting your
vote! All the files are available in a staging area in my home dir on
people.
+1
Gianny
On 21/12/2006, at 5:54 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I've done the work to fix some of our spec jars so they are
compliant and would like us to start releasing them and removing
snapshot references from our builds.
The first one I fixed is javax.annotation 1.0:
Release Branch:
+1
Gianny
On 21/12/2006, at 6:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Verified and compliant and ready for release.
Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
branches/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0
I hereby propose we release this branch as final.
Here's my +1
-David
+1
Gianny
On 21/12/2006, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Verified and compliant and ready for release.
Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
branches/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0
I hereby propose we release this branch as final.
Here's my +1
-David
Hi,
I am fixing this problem right now. Should be fixed in about 10 minutes.
Sorry for this problem.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/01/2007, at 8:19 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Building trunk fails for me with:
c:\development\geronimo\modules\geronimo-jetty6\src\main\java\org
Hello Alan,
Thanks for fixing the build so quickly. I had some local changes that
I was not able to commit before these Jetty6 API changes. Hopefully,
I believe that the new API is now pretty stable as session migration,
replication, fail-over, redistribution of session states when a
Hi,
The online deployer, e.g. deployer.jar, needs to have geronimo-deploy-
config along with all the modules providing an implementation of this
interface added as MANIFEST ClassPath entries. It seems to me that to
have the relevant geonimo-*-builder is not so great: builders are
executed
Hi,
I think that support for clustered Web-applications with Jetty is now
working.
Here is a description of how this works; note that most of the
described behavior is WADI specific.
Group Communication
Group communications are performed by Tribes, which is the Tomcat 6
group
Hi Chris,
I also had this problem. If you re-compile OpenEJB, then you should
be fine. In a few words, ModuleConfigurer.getModuleType has been
recently added and you are running with a EjbConfigurer which does
not define this method.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 08/01/2007, at 10:15 PM,
Hi, this is the content of the email that I sent with the title jsr88
- ModuleConfigurer - still some classpath problems.
The online deployer, e.g. deployer.jar, needs to have geronimo-deploy-
config along with all the modules providing an implementation of this
interface added as MANIFEST
Hi Hernan,
The problem is that the ModuleConfigurer GBeans installed into the
server are marshalled from the Geronimo server to the command line
deployer. As the command line deployer does not allow dynamic class
loading and the various ModuleConfigurer implementations running in
the
and
possibly other people have prototypes of how to have some kind of
bootstrap repository that needs only one or two jars in lib, the
rest coming from the repo.
Anyone think remote dconfigbeans are a pressing issue?
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi
better :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I think that support for clustered Web-applications with Jetty is
now working.
Congratulations Chris !
Gianny
On 25/01/2007, at 5:53 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new
runtime modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging he has
accepted our offer to join our merry little band of pirates.
Please join me
On 28/01/2007, at 7:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think in order to allow multiple instances to work off of the
same installation effectively we need to have a tiered repository
support,
On 29/01/2007, at 3:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 28, 2007, at 3:48 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 28/01/2007, at 7:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
snip
I don't see any value in having a hierarchy here: I think that
each item should be present in exactly one place. For instance
if you
+1
Gianny
On 29/01/2007, at 12:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Oh yeah...here is my+1
On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review
at:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1
In this directory you will
+1 lets bring it in, this is great
Gianny
On 01/02/2007, at 2:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is the formal vote to accept the J2G codebase and bring it
through incubation (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-
devm=116906208022256w=2)
The final destination is to be
Hi,
I am ready to check-in some changes to the way online and offline
deployers are booted and configured such that ModuleConfigurer can be
easily registered with the JMXDeploymentManager.
As per David J. suggestion, deployer.jar now boots a Kernel and
starts a list of configurations to
+1
Gianny
On 01/02/2007, at 2:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3
as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch:
+1
Gianny
On 01/02/2007, at 2:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3
as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch:
+1
Gianny
On 01/02/2007, at 2:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, I've updated the pom of this spec to be compiled with jdk 1.3
as requested by a project in jakarta commons that needs them.
I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final.
Release Branch:
Hello Ted,
Thanks for raising this issue. I will soon commit a fix to address
this problem.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 02/02/2007, at 12:28 AM, Ted Kirby wrote:
Can you address any of the issues raised in JIRA 2767, Minimize side
effects of the offline deployer? Thanks.
On 02/02/2007, at 4:11 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 5:00 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I am ready to check-in some changes to the way online and offline
deployers are booted and configured such that ModuleConfigurer can
be easily registered with the JMXDeploymentManager
Hi Jarek,
I think the Spring filter is a leftover of the time when the Jetty
module was used to import Spring to configure WADI.
I do not know why antlr is there. As it is not directly imported by
Jetty6 poms, I think that we can also drop it.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 02/02/2007, at 3:07 PM,
Ooops my bad. I tested the recent deployer changes with a .geronimo-
deployer file in my home directory and hence was not prompted to
enter my credentials; so, I did not detect this problem. I can fix
this problem tonight my time, i.e. in ~12 hours; the fix should be to
add the jline
I just dropped this dependency. It is indeed not needed.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/02/2007, at 5:39 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
When building with a clean repo, trunk's bootstrap stage is barfing
building the geronimo-maven-plugin because of missing car:
Joe,
Sorry for breaking the TCK once again. Hopefully, David J. has fixed
my mistake fast enough and TCK progress has not been impacted too much.
Thanks for your patience,
Gianny
On 21/02/2007, at 9:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Gianny,
This is still broken for the TCK. Was there a comparable
Hi Anita, thanks for raising this problem.
It is related to a change I made. I just attached a patch to the JIRA
that I will commit tonight if you do not do it before me.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 02/03/2007, at 2:37 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
The jline and geronimo-deploy-tool jars are not
+1
Gianny
On 01/03/2007, at 9:28 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Folks,
this vote is for moving the authoring of Geronimo's web site over
Confluence. This mean that we will no longer use the anakia, xdocs
and ant scripts to generate the web site, instead we will use
Confluence.
There is a
+1
Also, I do think that it is worth to notice that these two areas, and
interop especially, are very complex. FWIW, I have stopped trying to
follow IIOP related commits a long time ago as it was way above my
understanding. As an aside, these guys have been/are really fast. Not
many people
+1
I like the idea to branch at the beginning and merge back any bug fixes
if need be.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 5/07/2005 12:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Do we have a consensus that we should branch at the beginning of the release
cycle instead of at the end as we have done in the past?
If so,
On 5/07/2005 1:55 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I want to get the key generator changes in for M4. However, I'm
currently blocked because I can't add the new module to TranQL. So I'd
like to resolve that before the branch. Other than that, I'm
On 6/07/2005 6:23 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I didn't -1 it, I said it wasn't a pre-req, as in I think we can release
M4 without it.
As for a technical reason, where's the code? Last I saw was a patch for
TranQL that caused a circular dependency and
On 7/07/2005 9:07 PM, b Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we be invoking the deploy tool in startup scripts with the
following (taken from GERONIMO-502)?
java -Djava.security.manager
-Djava.security.policy=var/security/deployer.policy -jar
bin/deployer.jar standard
On 8/07/2005 4:08 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
javax.ejb.NoSuchObjectLocalException
at
org.openejb.entity.EntityInstanceInterceptor.invoke(EntityInstanceInterceptor.java:128)
at
sn
A further investigation has revealed that
AddressLocal address =
On 8/07/2005 11:28 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
So I've put in the new PK generator configuration syntax. Once
again, the openejb-jar.xml syntax has changed. The old style of declaring
a separate PK Generator GBean is still supported, but with a different
element. I'm going to update the wiki
loading just to print arbitrary exceptions.
Aaron
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Gianny Damour wrote:
One of the benefit is to allow for remote class loading of classes,
which cannot be loaded from the deployer classpath. For instance,
exceptions nested within DeploymentExceptions may not be defined
On 8/07/2005 8:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 7/6/2005 8:13 PM:
Resending this question as it was hidden in thread 'Re: Startup
Scripts discussion ( GERONIMO-693 )'
Should we be invoking the deploy tool in startup scripts with the
following (taken from
Hi Jaceck,
There is indeed an integration test in OpenEJB itests there:
src/ejb/META-INF/openejb-jar.xml.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 8/07/2005 9:36 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Here's the relevant snippet from customer-ejb-plan.xml:
...also I'd be glad to create a test case
table since then when the entity
goes to insert itself it would find that the row already existed. How is
it that the AutiIncrement PK generator communicates to the entity that its
row already exists?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Gianny Damour wrote:
1) Implement a PK Generator
the values after the insert was
completed.
At this stage, the INSERT statement needs to be explicitly provided;
this can be enhanced. I confirm that the sql should insert a row in the
entity table.
Thanks,
Gianny
Thanks,
Aaron
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Gianny Damour wrote:
1) Implement
Sorry for this late reply; I was on holidays last week and I am still
catching up with emails.
John, you can remove it as it was solely used to enable remote classloading.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 23/07/2005 9:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, the policy file was to be used when running the
Yes: you can find them in the folder schema of a geronimo server
installation.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 26/07/2005 10:10 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Hi
Are there any xsd schema's for each of the deployment plan files?
Hi,
They are indeed not used except for documentation purposes. I am not
sure that we should rename them documentation as this will not mirror
the standard DD.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 28/07/2005 12:43 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What's the purpose of the ejb-relation-name and
On 28/07/2005 1:01 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I believe there are certain scenarios where multiple relationships can
exist between a pair of entities and there is no other way to tell them
apart.
Well if this was true, then our code is broken,
, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
They are indeed not used except for documentation purposes. I am not
sure that we should rename them documentation as this will not mirror
the standard DD.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 28/07/2005 12:43 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What's the purpose of the ejb
Hi,
I have been trying to understand why I was not able to make the Java Pet
Store Supplier Application to pass a security check and I think that I
have discovered a potential bug. Prior to log it, I would like to
confirm that this is not a code issue in PetStore.
The scenario is rather
+1
Gianny
David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tests are still running on David J's machine and should finish
sometime tomorrow. Since voting takes a day or so anyway, let's get
started and do them in parallel.
Vote:
Let's Release these binaries when the tests successfully
+1 to move it to the main build.
Gianny
On 5/08/2005 4:58 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
At the Geronimo BOF last night there was discussion about moving the
web console out of the sandbox and into the main build - general
consensus seem to be something was better than nothing :-)
Any objection
On 31/08/2005 7:05 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, this is just an attempt to get people to voice their expectations
about the release in general, not in regards to any feature or item
in the release.
1) If we could deliver M5 in _3__ weeks, I would consider that a
complete success.
2)
[ ] Friday 9/9 is the QA Cut date
[X] I think it should be after Friday...and should be on 9/16/05
I have been disturbed over the last two weeks. However, the DDL creation Ant
task that I have been working on is nearly done (integration tests being
implemented). I would like to check it in over
Congratulations Sachin!
As an Eclipse user, I am glad to see this Eclipse plugin. I will try it over
the week-end :)
Thanks for your work,
Gianny
Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome aboard!
Regards,
Alan
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 9/13/2005 3:29 AM:
The Apache
This is once again my bad :(
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Gianny
On 21/09/2005 1:50 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm seeing a test failure on two machines, I think this is due to the
default fetch group changes this morning in tranql:
Testsuite:
+1
Gianny
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins
Hi,
Relationships cannot be defined in ejbCreate and should be defined in
the corresponding ejbPostCreate. The spec says (p. 188):
The entity Bean Provider must not attempt to modify the values of
cmr-fields in an ejbCreateMETHOD method. This should be done in the
ejbPostCreateMETHOD method
Hi,
I have just added a new attribute and two new elements to each type of
configurations, which give us more control on class loading:
* the inverseClassloading attribute can be used to inverse the standard
class loading delegation model. This means that class loading requests
are first
+1 to ratify.
Gianny
On 19/10/2005 12:01 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
+1 from me to ratify. PMC members should vote here.
Also, we'll need a contribution agreement from Epiqtech. I'll take
that as a todo.
geir
On Oct 17, 2005, at 8:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Thanks for
:40 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 10/19/05, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another approach would be: for each plain dependency, we could generate
a META-INF/geronimo-service.xml file based on the POM dependencies as
part of a standard build. Transitive dependencies would be achieved
On 20/10/2005 2:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 19, 2005, at 9:57 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
You may be right. Having said that, this XML parsing is done each
time that a dependency is declared by a configuration. I see this
approach as more self-contained than a solution based on the build
On 20/10/2005 3:08 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Oct 19, 2005, at 9:23 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 20/10/2005 1:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been working on building geronimo using the packaging and
assembly plugins. This works fine except for the unmanageable
dependencies
On 20/10/2005 4:13 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 19, 2005, at 11:03 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 20/10/2005 2:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 19, 2005, at 9:57 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
You may be right. Having said that, this XML parsing is done each
time that a dependency
Hi,
I would like to add these new contracts to
org.apache.geronimo.core.service.InvocationResult:
public void put(Object key, Object value);
public Object get(Object key);
public Object remove(Object key);
They could be used to add various information to an invocation result.
My immediate
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
+1
Gianny
On 16/08/2007, at 6:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the
On 31/08/2007, at 10:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Clustering
IIUC we have a lot of partial clustering solutions. For instance
there's WADI, native tomcat clustering, a terracotta integration,
and IIUC Jeff has been working on a clustering solution (my
apologies if I left any out). I'd
Hi,
I would like to add a dependency to a new wadi module, wadi-aop,
relying on AspectJ JARs.
The goal it to allow users to configure delta session replication for
their clustered Web applications. I capture here how this works:
that have large
session objects this looks like a way to effectively manage them.
Is your question about the license used for AspectJ from the
Eclipse Foundation ?
On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a dependency to a new wadi module, wadi-aop,
relying
Hi Kevan,
Many thanks for taking the time to explain me what I should do. It is
highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 04/10/2007, at 3:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Matt,
Yes: I would like to add this dependency from the Eclipse
Hi,
Over the last two weeks, I have been working on various
experimentations in order to validate and demonstrate the
effectiveness of WADI's distributed session engine and replication
engine. I wrote a WIKI page to capture the findings:
On 17/10/2007, at 11:53 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Excerpt of the conclusion:
The effectiveness of the design and implementation of WADI's
distributed
session lookup engine and replication engine is further comforted
by the
observed average response times
Dain, Jeff,
Thanks for your feedback on the weakness of the annotation approach.
It should be easy to have a less obtrusive configuration mechanism as
the logic is encapsulated within a single (AspectJ) aspect. I will
see what I can do.
In more details, an aspect adds the interface
Hi,
I resumed this week-end some work on clustered deployment. I think
this will be completed in about 2-3 weeks. This will allow
distribute, uninstall, start, stop, et cetera of configurations to a
cluster as a single logic operation. I am keen to get this change in
for 2.1, if it does
heads-up?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/11/2007, at 9:34 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny,
Since there are multiple clustering implementations going on at the
same
time, could you please keep us aprised of what you are doing so we
don't
clash?
Thanks,
Jeff
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I resumed
Hi,
I have just checked in support for distribution of configurations to
clusters and also management, i.e. start/stop, of such clustered
deployments.
I will try to explain how everything hangs together so that people
can jump in, provide feedback, request enhancements etc.
There is
On 13/11/2007, at 4:35 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
2. The clustered store uploads the backed configuration to the
registered cluster members, which subsequently locally install
them. If
the remote installation fails for one of the members, then the
clustered store
On 13/11/2007, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
You can successfully distribute when all the configured cluster
members are running. If one of them is down, then the installation
fails. This seems to be a typical scenario - at least based on the
clustered deployments I
On 13/11/2007, at 8:01 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
I hope we are not talking about the same thing. I am talking about a
deployment time constraint and not a runtime constraint mandating
that all the servers are reachable when an application is *deployed*.
FWIW
be looking into the necessary TCK changes?
Thanks,
Joe
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I have just checked in support for distribution of configurations
to clusters and also management, i.e. start/stop, of such
clustered deployments.
I will try to explain how everything hangs together so that people
Hi Kevan,
Sorry for my late reply and thanks for raising this security issue. I
believe that the encryption of password attributes is not enough in
this case as password in this case is an XML JavaBean attribute;
based on a cursory review of GBeanOverride, it seems that this case
is not
Hi,
gsh does not work for me anymore. It seems that some classes are no
more found:
~/geronimo/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5/target/
geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-SNAPSHOT$ bin/gsh -v
Apache Geronimo (2.1-SNAPSHOT)
Type 'help' for more information.
All,
Jason gave me a hand on IRC. He is working on it; so, watch his
commit to know when gsh is up and running again!
Thanks,
Gianny
On 17/11/2007, at 11:46 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
gsh does not work for me anymore. It seems that some classes are no
more found:
~/geronimo
101 - 200 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
