Re: [RTC] Vote restart on 2 javamail patches

2006-07-11 Thread Jeff Genender
Rick, I have reviewed your patches and they appear fine to me. You get my +1. Jeff Rick McGuire wrote: These two patches have been sitting in [RTC] state for 2 weeks now with no activity. The only votes received so far have been non-binding ones. These changes are holding up other work,

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.5 of XBean

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 John Sisson wrote: James Strachan wrote: I've just applied 2 trivial bug fixes to the xbean-spring module of XBean. The first is a patch from Guillaume which is a one liner to create the xml parser using a helper method (used by all the other ApplicationContext implementations).

Re: Geronimo cluster API suggestion

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Genender
Filip, Thanks for the first pass on this...it looks interesting. Jeff Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Ladies and Gentlemen, from our talk at Dublin clustering BOF, clustering is not always about state replication, there are other aspects of it, and its those I am focusing on here, as state

Re: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0

2006-07-15 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Sachin Patel wrote: Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please vote. On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the number of

Re: GroupId for DayTrader needed.

2006-07-18 Thread Jeff Genender
I am a big fan of org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader. But...are we leading ourselves down the path of a Windows dir size too big nightmare? Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: Why not give it is own: org.apache.geronimo.daytrader --jason On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Prasad Kashyap

Re: Maven2 Conversation Status

2006-07-20 Thread Jeff Genender
IMHO, until its all completely functional and working, I would not wage a +1 for moving it in and deprecating 1.0. If you are interested in moving in POMs and plugins, then I would be amenable to that. However, I would not at all be amenable to any sort of deprecation until the M2 build is 100%

Re: Maven2 Conversation Status

2006-07-20 Thread Jeff Genender
in the TCK m2 to trunk. 4) Deprecate M1. I cannot support removing/deprecating the M1 build until we can build assemblies and have a working TCK. Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: On Jul 20, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: IMHO, until its all completely functional and working, I would not wage

Re: Liferay Plugin for G

2006-07-20 Thread Jeff Genender
!) Liferay, by default (because our users are now used to it), deploys itself to / That isn't mandatory though. So for our plugin, we just have to make it map to something like /portal or /liferay instead. It requires one xml change and one property change. I'm also working with Jeff Genender

Re: Liferay Plugin for G

2006-07-20 Thread Jeff Genender
to Paul!) Liferay, by default (because our users are now used to it), deploys itself to / That isn't mandatory though. So for our plugin, we just have to make it map to something like /portal or /liferay instead. It requires one xml change and one property change. I'm also working with Jeff

Re: Maven2 Conversation Status

2006-07-20 Thread Jeff Genender
Jason Dillon wrote: I would give you a +0 at this point. You asked what does 100% cover? Based on your description, you said you had Jetty working but not Tomcat, unless I read that wrong. IMHO, that is not acceptable to begin deprecating M1. Jetty and Tomcat J2EE and Minimal all work

Re: Maven2 Conversation Status

2006-07-21 Thread Jeff Genender
Jason Dillon wrote: On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:02 PM, John Sisson wrote: It built successfully for me in cygwin (first attempt failed in timer tests). I'll try to do some tests on the weekend. Timer tests are known to fail on slower or more resource constrained systems. All of the failures

Re: JPA spec snapshots location

2006-07-23 Thread Jeff Genender
Should we move these against the spec trunk as SNAPSHOTS? I think the time is ripe ;-) There are a few projects using this code base. Jason Dillon wrote: I'd be happy to work on this (with Alan?) after the m2conversion bits are merged (maybe while waiting for RTC on that too). I still need

Re: svn commit: r424886 - in /geronimo/specs/branches/jee5_exp/geronimo-spec-jpa/src/main/java/javax/persistence: ./ spi/

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Ahhh yes...I keep forgetting about that feature ;-) Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jgenender Date: Sun Jul 23 19:50:48 2006 New Revision: 424886 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=424886view=rev Log: Updated to EJB3 spec final

Re: Proposing an SSB to JDBC mode for Daytrader

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Cool idea. I look forward to seeing the results. Jeff Christopher Blythe wrote: The EJB and Direct modes in Daytrader provide a good measure of how a pure EJB (Session/CMP Entity) application stacks up against a pure JDBC based app. However, one of the things I have felt Trade/Daytrader has

Re: Need a web site update

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Very weird...I just fixed it...let see if it sticks. Aaron Mulder wrote: Jeff and Matt -- you are each twice the man I am! At least, according to the committer page: http://geronimo.apache.org/contributors.html Thanks, Aaron P.S. It also has SVN merge errors in the HTML!!! Looks

Re: Need a web site update

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
problems if someone changes something and then `svn up` the workspace. Chances are this is what happened before... otherwise there should not have been conflict markers in the page. --jason On Jul 24, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: Very weird...I just fixed it...let see

Re: Need a web site update

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Awesome...Thanks! Aaron Mulder wrote: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/site/trunk/NOTES.txt?view=markup On 7/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep...I need a lesson on the normal way to update it...need to search the lists for the howto. Sorry. I was unaware it was svn'd

Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
I am going to agree with Aaron here. Jeff Aaron Mulder wrote: -1 to making this the preferred build -- we've lost the functionality to build plugins as part of the build. For example, see configs/welcome-jetty/src/conf/geronimo-plugin.xml Then look at

Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Jason, Do you think you could answer your peers a little bit more constructively? Your answers to people are a bit caustic and it is not helping promote a healthy environment. Is there something that we can help with to aid in a more amicable interaction with your peers? Jeff Jason Dillon

Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron Mulder wrote: On 7/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think you could answer your peers a little bit more constructively? Your answers to people are a bit caustic and it is not helping promote a healthy environment. Is there something that we can help with to aid

Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
. --jason On 7/24/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason, Do you think you could answer your peers a little bit more constructively? Your answers to people are a bit caustic and it is not helping promote a healthy environment. Is there something that we can help with to aid

Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Jason Dillon wrote: If things start to frustrate you...chat about them or walk away from the terminal after typing up a nasty message...hitting delete before send. I have yet to send any message that I believe to have been nasty in nature. Jason, that was a tip for when you feel like

Re: [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Jason Dillon wrote: But, I don't feel that it is wise to simply drop in a note for the last word, or to leave a comment that could be misinterpreted go unchallenged, as those situations tend to bread common (mis)conceptions of a situation which is not necessarily the accurate reality.

Re: Liferay Plugin for G

2006-07-25 Thread Jeff Genender
for the help Jeff, Paul! -- Brian Chan Chief Executive Officer Liferay, LLC Enterprise. Open Source. For Life. From: Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Liferay Plugin for G Date: Fri Jul 21 03:23:22 GMT 2006 On 7/20/06, Jeff Genender

Re: Should we allow more ejb-links than j2ee specifies?

2006-07-27 Thread Jeff Genender
I think extended functionality is good. As long as it doesn't violate or break our spec compliance, why not allow it to do more? I am in support of extended functionality. Jeff David Jencks wrote: As part of work on GERONIMO-2148 fixing ejb-refs between modules I extended (or made work) some

Re: Where is the source code for the G samples ?

2006-07-27 Thread Jeff Genender
I believe we used the source from Tomcat verbatim as we did not want to fork the code. In fact IIRC, it was a rename of the jars. Jeff Prasad Kashyap wrote: Does anybody know where I can find the source code for the geronimo samples, jsp-examples and tomcat-examples ? We are using these in

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2219) [RTC] Merge m2migration (functional m2 build) to trunk

2006-07-27 Thread Jeff Genender
You have them. Matt's comment looks like a +1 and you have Jacek and mine. Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: 2 down... 1 to go. Any PMC member want to be the lucky third? --jason On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Jacek Laskowski (JIRA) wrote: [

Re: Geronimo site POC using Confluence Autoexport

2006-07-27 Thread Jeff Genender
IMHO, I like it a lot. I would like you to continue. Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: Is there any desire to continue moving in this direction? I personally believe that by having the site in Confluence that it will be much easier for us to keep the content up to date, as well as easily be able

Tomcat 5.5.17 for 1.2?

2006-07-28 Thread Jeff Genender
What do people think? I would like to see us on the most stable version of Tomcat for 1.2. Comments? Thanks, Jeff

Re: Liferay Plugin for G

2006-07-31 Thread Jeff Genender
Paul McMahan wrote: - Jeff is helping with a new version of Liferay that can be deployed into Geronimo as an EAR file and can reuse some jars in Geronimo's repository. My understanding is that those changes will be rolled into the next version of Liferay (4.1.0?). I'm also going to see if

Re: 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT Memory Problems

2006-07-31 Thread Jeff Genender
Yep..I concur...this is a nasty one and we need to see whats up. This is a blocker IMHO.. Jeff Aaron Mulder wrote: Jeff just noted that Liferay seems to take an abnormal amount of memory to run. I just redeployed the console twice and got an OutOfMemoryError. When working on the console

Re: 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT Memory Problems

2006-08-02 Thread Jeff Genender
Nice work Kevan. I got Liferay enterprise to run fine now ;-) Jeff Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Concur...blocked. Aaron Mulder wrote: Jeff just noted that Liferay seems to take an abnormal amount of memory to run. I just redeployed the

Re: Patches in RTC (Geronimo - August 4, 2006)

2006-08-04 Thread Jeff Genender
Nice work David! David Blevins wrote: On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: So, if one votes on the issue that indicates it is a +1? That'd be my first assumption. -David --jason On Aug 4, 2006, at 4:28 AM, David Blevins wrote: On Aug 4, 2006, at 3:40 AM, [EMAIL

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-05 Thread Jeff Genender
The mvn eclipse:eclipse has big issues with the xmlbeans generated classes (I wrote a hack in our maven 1 build to deal with this). Have you gotten this to work? Thanks, jeff Jason Dillon wrote: I have finished merging svkmerge/m2migration to trunk. Now it is time for everyone to start

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-05 Thread Jeff Genender
Actually this can be fixed if we go to xbean 2.2 where they use reflection for the TypeSystemHolder class. This makes the IDE's happy. How do people feel about upping to xbean 2.2.0? See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-120 for this problem and that its fixed ;-) Jeff Jeff

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-05 Thread Jeff Genender
David Jencks wrote: On Aug 5, 2006, at 7:40 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Aug 5, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: Actually this can be fixed if we go to xbean 2.2 where they use reflection for the TypeSystemHolder class. This makes the IDE's happy. How do people feel about upping

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-05 Thread Jeff Genender
with XMLBeans 2.2. Thanks, Aaron See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-120 for this problem and that its fixed ;-) Jeff Jeff Genender wrote: The mvn eclipse:eclipse has big issues with the xmlbeans generated classes (I wrote a hack in our maven 1 build to deal

Re: [Review] Support per property PropertyEditors

2006-08-05 Thread Jeff Genender
I gave you one... Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Everybody, I'm looking for 3 PMC +1s so that I can commit the patch attached to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-36 It basically allows us to do things like: x:memoryManager limit=100 bytes/ x:memoryManager limit=1000 k/

Re: [Review] Support per property PropertyEditors

2006-08-05 Thread Jeff Genender
lately, so it slipped by...sorry about that. I will update it now. Jeff thanks david jencks On Aug 5, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: I gave you one... Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Everybody, I'm looking for 3 PMC +1s so that I can commit the patch attached to: http

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-06 Thread Jeff Genender
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-120 for this problem and that its fixed ;-) Jeff Jeff Genender wrote: The mvn eclipse:eclipse has big issues with the xmlbeans generated classes (I wrote a hack in our maven 1 build to deal with this). Have you gotten this to work? Thanks, jeff

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-06 Thread Jeff Genender
Done. David Jencks wrote: On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: David Jencks, Can I open a JIRA to update to XMLBeans 2.2 and assign it to you (since you offered)? How about adding some comments to GERONIMO-2082? thanks david jencks Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: I'd

Re: Single Sign On with Geronimo 1.0

2006-08-07 Thread Jeff Genender
, it should not be necessary to rebuild the server to use the SSOValve (unless something has changed recently). I just enabled it in var/config/config.xml. Best wishes, Paul On 8/7/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does

Re: Drop the m1 build

2006-08-07 Thread Jeff Genender
I am all for dropping the m1 build too... But I think the people who run the TCK should speak up first as this may impact them significantly... Jeff Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for several days now and no one has noticed.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Kevan Miller to the Geronimo PMC

2006-08-08 Thread Jeff Genender
Congrats Kevan! Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please welcome Kevan Miller as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. Kevan recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. As such we now have an additional set of eyes to help with reviews as well as other PMC oversight responsibilities. Kevan has

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-08 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron, Please look at the openejb3-persistence module as it does a majority of what you described below... 1) Takes a classloader 2) looks for persistence.xml files 3) parses found persistence.xml files 4) Creates EntityManagerFactories based on the persistence.xml file specifications. 5) Loads

Re: RTC voting and in particular pluggable jacc issue

2006-08-09 Thread Jeff Genender
Yes...+1I have changed my practice and place a comment in the JIRA. I think I voted before changing my practice ;-) David Jencks wrote: AFAICT it's not possible to find out from jira when votes on issues were done, nor do they get comments. Therefore I think we need to ask PMC members

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
David Blevins wrote: On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: Aaron, Please look at the openejb3-persistence module as it does a majority of what you described below... 1) Takes a classloader 2) looks for persistence.xml files 3) parses found persistence.xml files 4

Re: AJAX and Geronimo

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
Paul, Yes...this idea has my full support. The more user friendly and better experience of the console only puts us ahead of the game. The few AJAX components we have already (thermometers) has garnered a lot of positive feedback, so the more, the merrier ;-) Jeff Paul McMahan wrote: Dojo

Re: XBEAN-39 - what's next?

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
This is a bug fix...no votes needed. It should be able to be committed directly. Jeff Stefan Kleineikenscheidt wrote: Hi all, I've attached a second version of patch to XBEAN-39 with the changes Guillaume suggested. As far as I understand the process PMC members have to review and vote

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
Isn't this the same problem we (and other app servers) have with Spring and Commons Logging? If you are duplicating the persistence units, then it should be handled the same way its handled for Spring, yes? Aaron Mulder wrote: So what happens if an EJB JAR has a persistence.xml and a web app in

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron Mulder wrote: On 8/11/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't this the same problem we (and other app servers) have with Spring and Commons Logging? If you are duplicating the persistence units, then it should be handled the same way its handled for Spring, yes? What way

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron Mulder wrote: On 8/11/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With regard to duplicating PUs, in theory, it shouldn't make a difference if the PU was already loaded in a parent loader. I think it does. The web app is not necessarily supposed to see JPA configurations in an EJB

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron Mulder wrote: On 8/11/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I understand where you are going with this. I totally agree with your thinking here. But...IIUC...in the web app, if you are including your own PU, you likely wouldn't be using the JNDI (and thus the container

Re: JPA plugin (was Re: Java 1.4 and JEE 5)

2006-08-12 Thread Jeff Genender
David Blevins wrote: Seems like I'm walking in mid-conversation, but I hope I can add some details. On Aug 11, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: On 8/11/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I understand where you are going with this. I totally agree with your thinking

Re: JPA Plugin Status

2006-08-14 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron, Why do you need to have vendor code? Why can't this be a bit more dynamic? Long term, I think its a bad idea to have to declare a vendor wrapped API when our competitors just need to dump the provider jars in a directory somewhere or include them in a deployment. Basically, anyone who

Re: JPA Plugin Status

2006-08-14 Thread Jeff Genender
, perhaps support default properties to be applied to all apps for that provider, etc. Thanks, Aaron On 8/14/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron, Why do you need to have vendor code? Why can't this be a bit more dynamic? Long term, I think its a bad idea to have

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome alan Cabrera as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2006-08-14 Thread Jeff Genender
Congrats Alan! Matt Hogstrom wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We are excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo. Alan has

Re: TranQL EJBQL

2006-08-17 Thread Jeff Genender
Andrus is Cayenne ;-) Matt Hogstrom wrote: For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like OpenJPA and / or Cayenne. Andrus Adamchik wrote: Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured, I'll ask here. Are there any plans to extend TranQL with

Re: 1.2 Release - Who's next and what is it?

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Genender
I am helping in the JPA arena as well. Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: JPA Integration (Open JPA / Cayenne) (I think Dain or Blevins ?) I'm just helping with the global jndi part of JPA. -dain

Re: bootstrap.bat for windows users

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Genender
What is your time period until removal of bootstrap? If there is a second version for windows, perhaps Mark (who BTW also is a committer) would be willing to maintain it. Jason Dillon wrote: I do not really want to have to maintain both the unix version and the windows versions of this script.

Re: bootstrap.bat for windows users

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Genender
Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 8/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant to just use Ant... if we end up using antrun from the bootstrap it will end up causing other antrun's to fail later on since some of them need additional dependencies... which won't work. Oh, didn't think

Re: bootstrap.bat for windows users

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Genender
and bootstrap.bat that will invoke the build. Then, everyone needs to have Ant 1.6.5 installed (and ant available on the PATH) and Cygwin is no longer required. --jason On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 8/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Re: bootstrap.bat for windows users

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Genender
difficult to support executions of individual steps using antrun. Best bet is to use something external... before it was /bin/sh... and now its gonna be Ant. I think that is better that /bin/sh and batch. --jason On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: Jason, Why not use

Re: bootstrap.bat for windows users

2006-08-23 Thread Jeff Genender
Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope this is not taken negatively...as it is not meant that way... Come on, Jeff. Nothing's going to be taken this way. Try it out and be prepared to fail :P Well...sometimes we need to be careful how we word

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2006-08-23 Thread Jeff Genender
Welcome David!!! Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining Apache as an Incubator project. David

Re: building eclipse projects with M2 build

2006-08-23 Thread Jeff Genender
Joe, Delete your ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins directory. The error you encountered usually means you have a corrupted meta tags. This solution usually does teh trick for me. Jeff Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks Ian. I did attempt to run it both on-line as well as off-line. Either way

Re: littleG (minimal-tomcat-server) status

2006-03-07 Thread Jeff Genender
Hi Joe, Thanks for working on this...I'll take a look. Jeff Joe Bohn wrote: I'd really like to get a committer to look into these changes and hopefully commit them fairly quickly. David J ... I know that you're tied up with the configID changes. Is there somebody else that could take a

Re: specs and javadoc question

2006-03-07 Thread Jeff Genender
John Sisson wrote: We shouldn't retype the comments in the XSD just like the javadoc in the spec. You are welcome to type your own original comments. This is debatable for XSDs. We currently seem to be using a lot of XSDs verbatim for the SPECs, so we need an official statement on this.

Re: Sun copyrights and our rights to include certain files in the repo

2006-03-09 Thread Jeff Genender
Yeah, I think we need some discussion here and maybe bring this up in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many of the xsds/dtds we use for Geronimo specs seem to have the Sun copyright in them, and/or are used verbatim from Sun with all comments, etc. In fact in the JIRA issue, GERONIMO-1686, Jacek pointed out

Re: littleG (minimal-tomcat-server) status

2006-03-09 Thread Jeff Genender
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1634 ) and GERONIMO-1699 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1699 ). Joe Jeff Genender wrote: Hi Joe, Thanks for working on this...I'll take a look. Jeff Joe Bohn wrote: I'd really like to get a committer to look into these changes

Re: Sun copyrights and our rights to include certain files in the repo

2006-03-09 Thread Jeff Genender
Here is what it says in the DTD: This document and the product to which it pertains are distributed under licenses restricting their use, copying, distribution, and decompilation. This document may be reproduced and distributed but may not be changed without prior written authorization of Sun

Re: Sun copyrights and our rights to include certain files in the repo

2006-03-09 Thread Jeff Genender
they had to have gotten this straightened out, right? ;-) I'd be happy to get the conversation going with legal, but its probably better that it come from a G committer. Thoughts? Bill Dudney MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org On Mar 9, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: Here is what it says

Re: Summary? was: Session API....

2006-03-13 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 from me...looks like the right track. Dain Sundstrom wrote: Sorry I've been a bit checked out lately... working on 1.1. I think we all agree in the APIs for sessions themselves (i.e., everything but location), and we agree that we need an event interface like this: void

Re: Error during server startup

2006-03-14 Thread Jeff Genender
I am not able to reproduce this on a Mac or Linux...I need to get my hands on a Windowz box to see what is up. Can you gage what GBean is getting started that is failing? Joe Bohn wrote: I created a JIRA for this problem a week ago or so. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1676

Re: Error during server startup

2006-03-14 Thread Jeff Genender
-server is working fine. Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a problem with jetty-server as well. Jetty-server does not produce stack trace but the log files (geronimo.log, jetty-*.log) are not created. Thnaks Anita --- Jeff Genender [EMAIL

Re: little-G fixes

2006-03-15 Thread Jeff Genender
Sure...I'll take a look today...thanks. Jeff Joe Bohn wrote: Jeff or Aaron, After the first patch for little-G was integrated about a month ago, I soon discovered two items in the console that were broken because they relied upon dependencies specified in other configurations that were

Re: Migrating geronimo-plugins to M2

2006-03-21 Thread Jeff Genender
Matt Hogstrom wrote: Sorry if this has been mentioned. Would it make sense to put out an informational message in the M1 plugins announcing deprecation so people could consider moving up or at least get them thinking about it. This is a good idea. Prasad Kashyap wrote: Wait a minute !

Re: org.apache.geronimo.gbean.NoProxy=true

2006-03-21 Thread Jeff Genender
This is great...debugging with proxies has been a real PITA...this will *really* help. Hiram Chirino wrote: +1 from me too. Way back when I was working on the ActiveMQ - Geronimo integration, the poxies gave me a few headaches. Regards, Hiram On 3/19/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ApacheCon Europe 2006 Information: Call for Papers and Registration

2006-03-22 Thread Jeff Genender
Matt, I may wish to help out a little on this... Lets chat more. Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: Guys, I am planning on submitting an abstract for a project update and performance review. Perhaps some more info on the server personality if it develops soon. Anyone else ? Matt Lars

Re: LDAP Demo Dependencies

2006-03-24 Thread Jeff Genender
Aaron Mulder wrote: It looks like the LDAP demo application (geronimo/ldap-demo-jetty/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car) depends on the sample LDAP realm (geronimo/ldap-realm/1.2-SNAPSHOT/car), but neither of these depend on the embedded Directory server. So if you install those without directory and try

Re: Welcome page i18n completed

2006-03-27 Thread Jeff Genender
Yeray Cabrera wrote: Hi All, I have i18n the welcome web application using jakarta taglibs-i18n, and completed the Spanish translation. Great! We are also thinking (my company), about starting the translation of the Admin Console. I would like to hear comments about using the jakarta

Re: 1.1 Release is gearing up...let's start stting the release goals

2006-03-28 Thread Jeff Genender
There are a few chunks of code in trunk that probably need to be moved over, like the local configuration's (config.xml) ability to remove attributes/empty values, etc. Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, Dain and David have mostly completed their work in branches/1.1. Given that the easy part

Re: VM options to run Geronimo

2006-03-29 Thread Jeff Genender
Did you try upping the memory? Set your environment JAVA_OPTS to: -Xms512M -Xmx512M Maxim Berkultsev wrote: Hi, all! I'm trying to make some performance evaluations of Geronimo with a help of JMeter. It has appeared relatively simple to get Geronimo out of work. I've tried to load it

Re: Session replication in Geronimo clustering

2006-03-29 Thread Jeff Genender
Did you read this and follow along? http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Clustering+Example Following the steps in the link should yield you replication. Jeff Phani Madgula wrote: Hi, I have been trying to use tomcat clustering with Geronimo for a

Re: Session replication in Geronimo clustering

2006-03-29 Thread Jeff Genender
machine, then this may be normal. You should check to be sure your session is still intact after shutting down that instance. Jeff Jeff Genender wrote: Did you read this and follow along? http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Clustering+Example Following

Re: VM options to run Geronimo

2006-03-29 Thread Jeff Genender
Whew 2G of Memory!!! Nice!! Matt Hogstrom wrote: In the tests I'm running I use the following: java -server -Xmx2048m -Xms2048m -XX:-PrintTenuringDistribution -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -jar /home/hogstrom/geronimo-1.0/bin/server.jar I have not played

Re: Session replication in Geronimo clustering

2006-03-29 Thread Jeff Genender
Filip, Thanks for the input...any idea on the missing attribute? Jeff Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: gentlemen, looks like there is an attribute missing from the Cluster...*Receiver.../*/Cluster element. the ReplicationListener.listen() method just gets the listen address (or tries to

Re: Session replication in Geronimo clustering

2006-03-29 Thread Jeff Genender
. Filip Jeff Genender wrote: Filip, Thanks for the input...any idea on the missing attribute? Jeff Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: gentlemen, looks like there is an attribute missing from the Cluster...*Receiver.../*/Cluster element. the ReplicationListener.listen() method just

Re: VM options to run Geronimo

2006-03-30 Thread Jeff Genender
responding in three hours under the same initial workload conditions. The console has indicated OOM. -- Best regards, Maxim Berkultsev, Intel Middleware Products Division 2006/3/29, Jeff Genender wrote: Did you try upping the memory? Set your environment JAVA_OPTS to: -Xms512M

Re: Session replication in Geronimo clustering

2006-04-03 Thread Jeff Genender
] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tcpListenAddress=xx.yy.zz.aa yup, this would cause a null pointer later on if not changed. it would have to be a valid value, or auto, which will decide the IP on its own. Filip Jeff Genender wrote: Yep...those should be set

Re: Restructuring the console src dirs

2006-04-03 Thread Jeff Genender
Yep this makes sense to me. I always wondered why we never did this to begin with ;-) Prasad Kashyap wrote: Last week Aaron, Joe, Paul and I discussed on IRC the intent to restructure the src dirs of the console under the application directory.

Re: Geronimo Documentation update - hibernate migration

2006-04-03 Thread Jeff Genender
As usual...nice work Hernan! Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, here is a doc update for migrating apps using Hibermate. http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/JBoss+to+Geronimo+-+Hibernate+Migration As usual, comments/suggestions are welcome :) Cheers! Hernan

Re: Geronimo JDK 1.5 Status

2006-04-03 Thread Jeff Genender
Without going through this with a fine tooth comb, this has more-or-less been my experience as well. Aaron Mulder wrote: I've heard a bit of misinformation floating around, and I'm not 100% sure I have the full picture, so I want to see if everyone agrees on these basic facts: 1) Geronimo

Re: Tomcat access logs

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Genender
HTTP and use that for their access logging. Jeff Genender wrote: A while back, someone had requested that the access logs for Tomcat be turned on by default in Geronimo. This basically involved enabling the Tomcat AccessLogValve, and this request was granted. Upon further review, it would

Re: celtix-geronimo integration redux

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Genender
You can prevent a GBean from being loded with the following: gbean name=whatever load=false / Conrad O'Dea wrote: Hi there, Right now I've got to the stage where I can, with a bit of tweaking of the config.xml, deploy Celtix to Geronimo and have it handle Web Service deployments. This is

Re: celtix-geronimo integration redux

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Genender
Forgot to answer your other question. I don't know if you can change the class of a current named bean. Dain or David Jencks may be able to answer that. But I *think*, you can shut off the gbean as I explained in my last email, then redeclare it in the config.xml. Here is an example of a new

Re: [jira] Unassigned issues (273) as of 2006-04-06

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Genender
-0 on jira to scm. scm has *much* more messages plowing through it. I will never catch jira's there. JIRA to dev seems to be a great way to alert developers of issues that need fixing. I personally am able to see anything that affects code that I produced through the jiras on dev. But thats

Re: [jira] Unassigned issues (273) as of 2006-04-06

2006-04-07 Thread Jeff Genender
;-) Jeff David Blevins wrote: Any thoughts on John's [EMAIL PROTECTED] idea? -David On Apr 6, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: -0 on jira to scm. scm has *much* more messages plowing through it. I will never catch jira's there. JIRA to dev seems to be a great way to alert

Re: Geronimo peak performance

2006-04-07 Thread Jeff Genender
I will have some numbers soon too... We are running on some Sun T2000 4 core machines. The numbers should be interesting on these boxes ;-) Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: I'm going to start externalizing the data as it evolves and Adopt Aaron's progresive disclosure method of publishing. As a

Re: Geronimo peak performance

2006-04-07 Thread Jeff Genender
and hopefully there will be zero bottleneck on IO. Jeff Matt Hogstrom wrote: I'm interested...the cool threads should be interesting. This is 4 cores and 8 threads per core or something like that ? Jeff Genender wrote: I will have some numbers soon too... We are running on some Sun

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >