I have ICLA on file and I'd like to have the contributor rights. thanks.
2008/12/20 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org:
Added the following recent contributors who all have an ICLA on file to the
geronimo-contributors group, which gives them write access to the User Doc
wikis and allows them to
replace the car in the build with the car in snapshot repository can
workaround this problem.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/framework/j2ee-security/2.2-SNAPSHOT/j2ee-security-2.2-SNAPSHOT.car
I'm wondering why the car in latest build is not the same
I'm building the Geronimo truck from source code. I found there are
many [ERROR] The protocol for the JAR file's URL is not supported in
the build log like following.
-
[ERROR] The protocol for the JAR file's URL is not supported
Thanks Donald !
2008/12/30 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
Three more contributors added:
genspring - Shawn - Lin Quan Jiang
delos - Delos - Dai Xuan
yg - Gang Yin
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Added the following recent contributors who all have an ICLA on file to
the
This problem happens again in the latest trunk build, can anyone look into
this ? thanks a lot.
Shawn Jiang wrote:
replace the car in the build with the car in snapshot repository can
workaround this problem.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo
Hello,
I'm trying to use the guide in
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/plugin-based-farming.html to setup
a plugin based farming. I have a couple of questions:
1, In Farm controller setup section. There's a instruction to get the
controller assemblies.
svn co
Some thoughts:
Users add http://apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/updates/ to their
Eclipse update manager. Every time the user start Eclipse update
manager to search updates, the update manager needs to download the
features to compare the remote feature version with installed version
to see if
: Shawn Jiang
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
Fix For: 2.1.4, 2.2
Attachments: G4518_Shawn.patch
1, change the host in config-substitutions.properties to 127.0.0.1
2, start the server.
3, shutdown the server.
*expected result*: the server could be shutdown.
*actual result
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public(Regular issues)
Components: startup/shutdown
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Environment: Windows XP + Sun JDK 1.5
Reporter: Shawn Jiang
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
Fix For: 2.1.4
Congratulations Ivan !
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks very much, it is my honour to be the Geronimo committer. ^_^
2009/3/7 Jay D. McHugh jaydmch...@gmail.com
Congratulations!
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome Ivan aboard, as he
Maven archetype is a powerful tools to make life easier when developers want
to create a project from scratch. Currently, Geronimo is using archetype to
create new testsuite/assembly/plugin/ quickly.
1: local - geronimo-archetype-testsuite (testsuite)
2: local - geronimo-assembly-archetype
With some search in list,I find a couple of discussions related to this
topic before:
http://markmail.org/message/s3mhwrtokqswotog
http://markmail.org/message/3h2m3loyhard3ncx
http://markmail.org/message/vvjksgnrcucqr3e2
These discussions are based on current single complex sample archetype here:
which is very powerful to
generate project contents based on user's input.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:41 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Maven archetype is a powerful tools to make life easier when developers
want to create
david jencks
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
From my point of view, every current geronimo sample could be converted to
a archetype. So that the user just needs install maven and he could just
Two proposals for this program:
1, To make a glassfish -- geronimo migration tool
2, To test a bunch of most popular JEE apps like nexus, sugarCRM... on
Geronimo.
a, If there are incompatibility problem in these Apps. Report or
contribute the fix back to the App project.
b, If being able
If possible, I think this jira should be integrated because it's easy to be
reproduced and easy to be fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4595
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:
Go ahead and integrate the fix.
Regards,
Joe
Ivan
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/plugins-group.html
Should the CXF JAX-WS command line tools be a part of Web Services Axis2
group ? please advice ,thanks.
1. Geronimo Plugin Group :: Web Services Axis2
- Description: This plugin group provides Web Services Axis2
functionality.
Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:
After a quick read of the JIRA and patch I agree ... I'll take a closer
look and apply it if all still seems well.
Thanks,
Joe
Shawn Jiang wrote:
If possible, I think this jira should be integrated because it's easy to
be reproduced and easy to be fixed
I'm wondering if we should put the GBean samples in this doc to a part of
current geronimo samples.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM, conflue...@apache.org wrote:
Page Edited :
GMOxDOC22http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC22: Developing
and Deploying a Geronimo
If no objection, I can create a JIRA and submit the sample project as a
patch.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if we should put the GBean samples in this doc to a part of
current geronimo samples.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM
into 2.1.4.
The change is minor and wouldn't cause a problem to integrate but I'd like
to verify that we have a consistent approach to plugins.
Joe
Shawn Jiang wrote:
I really think GERONIMO-4492
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4492should be applied to
2.1.4. If we don't
I makes sense to me that the documentation should promote using the car
extension. Let's update the document. Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:17 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I agree that to change the doc is another
of tools they want
to use. Before they were forced to use Sun's tools. I think Sun's
tools are still used by default though.
Jarek
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/plugins-group.html
Should the CXF JAX-WS command line tools
There are text based apache licenses at the bottom of every console pages
like this:
---
* * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more *
contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this
work for additional
help find the way to access the deployers decision making API.
thanks!
david jencks
On Mar 17, 2009, at 1:26 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
It looks to me as if there are no plans in the javaee apps parts of the
samples apps, so the plans are all in the plugin modules. I really don't
think we want
For (4)
I'd tested the 2.2 basic farm function and opened a JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4504
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4504Another question is
per http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/plugin-based-farming.html
The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/While
the latest binary here
I'm looking for a way to shutdown the dependencies checking because I saw:
- keeps historical dependencies in src/main/history/dependencies.xml
- if the file is missing, it creates it with current dependency info
- if the file is there, it compares with current dependency info and if
way to to turn off the checking like a
configuration in pom.xml.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:09 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I'm looking for a way to shutdown the dependencies checking because I saw:
- keeps historical
file.
Ivan
2009/5/29 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On May 29, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I'm looking for a way to shutdown the dependencies checking because I saw:
- keeps historical dependencies in src/main/history/dependencies.xml
- if the file is missing, it creates
Good to know, But I would like to mention that I can't access
http://geronimo.zones.apache.org:8081/nexus/content/repositories/geronimo from
China.
I'm not sure if this repo will be the final geronimo repo.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
My belated
, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Good to know, But I would like to mention that I can't access
http://geronimo.zones.apache.org:8081/nexus/content/repositories/geronimo from
China.
Where did that url come from? I don't think that nexus instance is running
any more. It doesn't have anything to do
I checked out activemq trunk and made a local build to resolve a similar
problem before. FYI.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:49 PM, rahul.soa rahul@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Devs,
I am trying to import some modules from Geronimo/plugins in eclipse for the
development. I am trying with CXF
:
Thanks Shawn,
I did the same and it worked for me too.
Best Regards,
Rahul
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked out activemq trunk and made a local build to resolve a similar
problem before. FYI.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:49 PM, rahul.soa
In Gtrunk\plugins\clustering\farming\src\main\plan\plan.xml, there are
some hardcodeed ser/pass/host/port string in it. I'm not sure if they
should be something like ${PlanClusterNodeName} so that they can be set in
server\config\config_substitution.properties.
gbean name=NodeInfo
Have you ever look at this Doc before ?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/Best+Practices+Tomcat+to+Geronimo+Migration
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Rodger eternalj...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm summarizing all the modifyings when migrating from tomcat to geronimo.
As I know,
to ${NamingPort + PortOffset}
Thanks,
Gianny
On 15/06/2009, at 6:14 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
In Gtrunk\plugins\clustering\farming\src\main\plan\plan.xml, there are
some hardcodeed ser/pass/host/port string in it. I'm not sure if they
should be something like ${PlanClusterNodeName} so
Shawn,
username, password and host should not be in
config-substitutions.properties.
port is the only candidate and should be set to ${NamingPort + PortOffset}
Thanks,
Gianny
On 15/06/2009, at 6:14 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
In Gtrunk\plugins\clustering\farming\src\main\plan\plan.xml
Agreed, use war file name as the default context is a good start.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
WebApp_ID is not so friendly, not sure when it begins, this should be
improved, maybe we could use the war file's name as the default context.
2009/6/16 Jason
There's a show details button to show the error. I agree that the *NOT*
part should be hi-lighted.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com wrote:
Why do we not show the error of a deployment, or in this case app start in
the console:
Also, shouldn't the *not*
Jason,
The odd message at the bottom of console is a known JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4605
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com wrote:
Was using the 2.1.4+tomcat release and found this very odd:
Also, why do we say Apache Tomcat/...
Guess it might be caused by the dead-loop or something like this when maven
reactor build order it. Not sure the root cause. Since system-database is a
popular dependency for many plugins.
It make sense to move it up in the pom.xml of plugins.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Ivan
Can anyone shed some light on this ?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question, Seems config.xml does not support
xml-attribute name=extendedJMXConnectorInfo
ns:javabean
xmlns:ns=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment
Anyway, I'll give it a try and update the result here.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:41 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
On Jun 19, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on this ?
The entire bit of xml is a single attribute for this gbean so if you want
://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/farming-using-deployment.html
for a full example.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/06/2009, at 6:01 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I can NOT find xml-attribute in schema of config.xml : http://
geronimo.apache.org/schemas-2.1/docs/attributes-1.2.xsd.html
So that I don't think
There are some testsuite test failed in the latest trunk build. See
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090622/logs-0300-tomcat/test.log
As a result, the build were not copied to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/ We
should fix
Agree to turn off debug and warning options from current pom because they
also caused build failure in my laptop.
configuration
optimizetrue/optimize
debugtrue/debug
showDeprecationtrue/showDeprecation
showWarningstrue/showWarnings
I believe there are some log that needs to be filtered out from current
server log because they are not good/useful information as part of default
INFO in log. All these kind of log messages could do is to bury the useful
info or to mislead the new users.
Some sample of them are:
2009-06-12
a hard time imagining how showing deprecations and warnings could
cause a build error. Can you provide more details?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 23, 2009, at 2:46 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Agree to turn off debug and warning options from current pom because they
also caused build failure in my
Is there some way to make everything use utf-8?
If you can figure out anything that makes it seem like this is a maven bug
I hope you will file a maven jira :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 23, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
This only happens to IBM JDK
, Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. Some INFO in the current log are not very useful.
Other than changing the log level in the code, another option is to modify
the default log4j configuration file, which might be easier to do.
-Jack
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Shawn
I filed a JIRA to maven compiler plugin about this problem:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-100
FYI.
2009/6/24 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
This is a Maven defect definitely, I'll open a JIRA to Maven.
Besides, I would try to submit a problem to IBM JDK somewhere about
I'm fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4688 and need to
expose xml-attribut to config.xml
The GBean is like this:
gbean name=NodeInfo
class=org.apache.geronimo.farm.config.BasicNodeInfo
attribute name=name${PlanClusterNodeName}/attribute
I found that there are inconsistent new line style in some source code.
These files are
trunck/framework/modules/geronimo-config-groovy-transformer/src/main/groovy/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/transformer/*.groovy
Which might bring possible svn commit error or build error. Can anyone
help
I can't recreate the same console/advanced failure in my local machine.
But I do find another console testsuite bug and filed a JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4720 (patch provided)
The failure of enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests is related to
run-as propagation from a
What's JDK version are you using ? Did you change your JDK recently ?
Seems like a imcompatiblity classes problem in
geronimo-jaxws-ejb-builder. You can delete your
localrepo/org/apache/modules/geronimo-jaxws-ejb-builder and try the build
again.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:30 AM, rahul.soa
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:54 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
If we're going to rewrite bits of the portal, we should consider moving to
pluto 2. IIUC there are a bunch of features in portlet 2 spec that may make
our portlets simpler. I also think we should investigate
If the test is wrong, tomcat run-as propagation logic must have bug because
Tomcat testsuite with the same case passed.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I can't recreate the same console/advanced failure
Memory: 341M/619M
[INFO]
[ra...@localhost GeronimoServer]$
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
What's JDK version are you using ? Did you change your JDK recently ?
Seems like
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Shawn,
The one failure in console/advanced on Tomcat is caused by fixing that
prompting issue in the console. I'm hoping it's just a timing issue
It's not a timing issue. This is caused by a modification on
Obviously, there are really some FAQ in the mailing list such as
1, Lib conflict including myface, spring
2, Log4j
3, JPA JTA/Non-JTA DS requirement.
4, web-service out of memory
5, Classloading problem caused by bad EAR package structure.
..
We need a formal page to record these FAQ. (only
in mailing list.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com wrote:
The Knowledge Base was intended to be the home for FAQ-ish thingys.
--jason
On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Obviously, there are really some FAQ in the mailing list such as
1, Lib conflict
Seeing this mail by chance. Actually, this is a Defect and had been fixed in
latest geronimo 2.1.4 release.
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4442
marco75 wrote:
I'am using geronimo 2.1.2. I have modified the
/config/config-substitutions.properties and changed all the
Sorry, Are we using the same trunk build ? I downloaded the tomcat trunk
build here:
*
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090703/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
*
When accessing http://localhost:8080/*dojo/dojo/*dojo.js , I got it's
content:
/*
console-testsuite\advanced passed in
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090708/logs-1500-jetty/test.log
but failed again in
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090708/logs-2100-jetty/test.log
Since there was no code change between the
I upload a patch to remove some extra log here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4712
Can anyone give any comments ? Thanks in advance.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
For those log in specific class or package. We can remove them
I noticed there's a maven resource best practice defined in
genesis-default-flava-2.0.pom.
1, Put normal resource under : ${project.basedir}/ src/main/resources
2, Put the resource that needs filtering under: ${project.basedir}/
src/main/filtered-resources
At the same time, many projects in
Can anyone give any comments to the patch to G-4712 ?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I upload a patch to remove some extra log here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4712
Can anyone give any comments ? Thanks in advance.
On Thu
Agreed.
Besides, I would prefer the patch for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4737 is applied before 2.2
branch. There are too many code changes in the jira.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like the testsuites are mostly passing for
Can't recreate this with firefox 3.5 on windows XP. I'm using the trunk
20090717 tomcat build.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:43 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
I wonder if this is expected or something that is just broken on my
machine...
I went to the web app page in the admin
Congratulations !
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Delos dait...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much for all your help!
I'm so honored to contribute to the community. -:)
2009/7/21 Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net
Congratulations Delos!
Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome
Adding a apache-snapshot as plugin repository could resolve this problem.
pluginRepositories
pluginRepository
idapache-snapshots/id
nameApache Snapshots Repository/name
urlhttp://repository.apache.org/snapshots/url
layoutdefault/layout
Will geronimo release it's own org/apache/geronimo/ext/tomcat/xxx 6.0.20 ?
if yes, When will it be released ?
--
Shawn
+artifactIdshared/artifactId
scopetest/scope
/dependency
We should add a jdt dependency in 2.1 branch too.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I got these failures locally.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Kevan Miller
I opened a JIRA and attached a patch to it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4764
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe most of the errors are caused by missing of JDT compiler:
The changes in latest 2.1 branch upgrade to tomcat
I just uploaded a patch to G4763 to fix this problem, thanks.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Just one out of the 4 daily trunk builds is done on IBM SDK and rest
are done on Sun JDKs (2 on 1.5 and 1 on 1.6).
Jarek
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald
I'm pretty sure that this is caused by
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml?view=diffr1=803286r2=803287pathrev=803287
Seems maven does not support multiple activated profiles in pom at the same
time. Need to figure out a better way to handle tool.jar path for IBM JDK
here.
I reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4763 to track this
problem.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure that this is caused by
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/pom.xml?view=diffr1=803286r2=803287pathrev
IIUC, Geronimo use myfaces as it's JSF implementation. The related code
resides in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/myfaces
The specific code to parse the myface config to get the managedBean classes
is:
Not sure if you've known this:
http://github.com/apache/geronimo/commits/
http://github.com/apache/geronimo/network
--
Shawn
work with geronimo with a very short break. Thank to
David Jenck for his support while Jarek was on holidays and his exact
replies all the time during the project. Thank to Shawn Jiang for his
suggestion on Maven problem.
Thanks to cxf people who replied my mails and gave their valuable
Congratulations Ivan !
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Victor Fang ibmclouds...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations!
2009/9/1 Delos dait...@gmail.com
Congratulations Ivan!
2009/9/1 Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com
Congratulations Ivan!!
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Joe Bohn
There's a JIRA opened about the plugin installing:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4829. It happens because the
new 2.2-snapshot plugins can't be found in m2-snapshot-repository. From my
understanding, current apache.snapshot is a proxy to
1, new nexus apache snapshot repo.
2,
Whenever a user wants to use jmx monitor, he/she needs to install
agent-car-jmx plugin firstly. Why not to ship this plugin with geronimo
while keep it load=false in config.xml by default ?
IMO, this size of agent-car-jmx plugin is only 13Kb. It's not a problem to
bundle it with geronimo
I'm working on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4852
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4851
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4850
And hopefully they can be included in G22
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish those JIRAs
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Whenever a user wants to use jmx monitor, he/she needs to install
agent-car-jmx plugin firstly. Why not to ship this plugin with geronimo
while keep it load=false in config.xml by default ?
IMO, this size of agent-car
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/
[image: [DIR]] 2.0/
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/
14-Sep-2009 01:00- Automated test builds
[image: [DIR]] 2.1/
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I also met this, Shawn has pointed that these days looks like the
branch 22 are not built autoly.
Might be the reason..
David Jencks is releasing txmanager 2.1.3. After that,upgrading the
dependency to
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
load=false. So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent.
When the users do not need EJB
I'm working on recovering connector portlet recently because the connector
configuration was changed to server.xml from config.xml.To make current
connector portlet work, I have to create corresponding connectorGBean in
memory for those connectors defined in server.xml.
The problem is
When
Forget this, I've found another way to avoid using BasePortlet.setProperty
to update the connector properties.
Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on recovering connector portlet recently because the connector
configuration was changed
I encountered xbean 3.6-SNAPSHOT, tomcat 6.0.20-SNAPSHOT artifacts missing
problem locally too.
These artifacts are all related with the components that are under voting.
I don't know what's the right time to upgrade released snapshots versions in
root pom.xml. When will these artifacts problems
Sorry, I should have forwarded 2.2 build failure to the list.
I encountered xbean 3.6-SNAPSHOT, tomcat 6.0.20-SNAPSHOT artifacts missing
problem locally too.
These artifacts are all related with the components that are under voting.
I don't know what's the right time to upgrade released
resolver.MultipleArtifactsNotFoundException: Missing:
--
1) org.apache.activemq.protobuf:activemq-protobuf:jar:1.0
Seems like amq-protobuf-staging (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/activemq-staging-026/) is
not available somehow.
Does anyone know how to resolve
Fixed this with JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4883
Shawn Jiang resolved GERONIMO-4883.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
2.2
2.1.5
Fixed in 21 branch,22 branch, and trunk.
On Tue, Sep 15
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
resolver.MultipleArtifactsNotFoundException: Missing:
--
1) org.apache.activemq.protobuf:activemq-protobuf:jar:1.0
Seems like amq-protobuf-staging (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/activemq
Seems *tomcat-fork-staging*
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-035/ is
not available ?
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:53 AM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
Geronimo Revision: 817907 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:58 PM, chi runhua chirun...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for reporting this.
I did a little bit digging and noticed the page is from [1], which is
located within a section of page [2]
No further result on how to edit [1].
[1] http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Apache Karaf was mentioned a couple times on this list as something we
want to consider for using in/for Geronimo 3.0. So, I've been looking
at it for last few days to get a better understanding how it works,
what it
I agree.
It's very helpful for everybody to track the osgi conversion status if all
changes are grouped into JIRAs with more description in addition to the svn
comments.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:54 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
People in at least 3 different time zones are
1 - 100 of 1508 matches
Mail list logo
