I looked at openejb3 pom at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb3
It is using 1.2-beta for all the geronimo jars!
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the output of building geronimo-openejb geronimo rev
497488
Dims,
I do not understand how/why this change fixes the problem discussed
here. The GBeanOperation was not (and need not be) a serializable
class. The error message is about GOperationInfo, which does have a
SUID.
PROTECTED] wrote:
I forget why Clover needed this actually... or why Eclipse needs it.
Can you refresh my memory please?
--jason
On Jan 13, 2007, at 3:26 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
We do need to run the script to copy the classes. I would like
to
copy them to target/xmlbeans
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/developing-geronimo-in-eclipse.html
In few words when a project is imported in eclipse, the
schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans classes from the target directory get
Please read target as target/classes
--- Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I still think there needs to be a general consensus for the
handling of annotations in Geronimo.
So, to better explain this design proposal I've
created a few simple UML diagrams that demonstrates how it might work
with one of the Geronimo
I would like to commit the patch attached to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607 tonight. It was
posted a week ago! I will need help with publishing geronimo artifacts
to avoid seeing the four letter word SUID on the mailing list.
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL
The same effect can be achieved by removing dependency on
testsupport-common in web-2.5-builder. This allows JCL to be picked
from g-kernel transitively in jetty6-builder. I like this solution
better.
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Sat Jan 13 01:22:30
I wouldn't dare remove the stuff you put in.. ;-)
thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really understand why... but this does appear to fix this
problem, and I do like it better. Only thing is that you left in the
temporary fix I committed last night to add
Most of the stuff from web-builder has been moved to
web-2.5-builder. There are some tests left, that might need to be
migrated to web-2.5-builder. We could rename it back to web-builder
after that.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the difference between these
We do need to run the script to copy the classes. I would like to
copy them to target/xmlbeans-classes for eclipse. Please see:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Clover-plugin-p6703715.html
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago I added some hacks to the build to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464558
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2650:
--
The web-app element should not contain 'j2ee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464205
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2723:
--
These two patches:
.. Update naming-builder
Java 5 SE runtime is a prerequisite for servlet 2.5 containers and
hence for jee 5 and G 2.0. The users can not expect to run jee 5 on
java 1.4. Please see an earlier discussion -
http://www.nabble.com/Make-trunk-1.5-only%21-p7561513.html
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm tempted
to say we should just use both schema jars and leave connector
unchanged.
I think we should have a single jar containing
o.a.g.xbeans.javaee.*
o.a.g.xbeans.j2ee.connector stuff and
o.a.g.xbeans.j2ee.jaxrpc stuff
Thanks
Anita
;
ConnectorDocument;
ConnectorType;
MessagelistenerType;
ResourceadapterType;
Where can I fine these?
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:36 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I am trying to use javaee5 xbeans in webservices-builder.
I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463926
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Prasad,
I made these changes:
schemas
Dims,
I also noticed a while ago that the server was being unpacked in a
directory with name longer than 10 chars. I thought I was the only one
using Windows! You can do a grep -r for any string in
C:\APACHE\geronimo\testsuite\webservices-testsuite\target directory and
it will start complaining
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:05 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks David J.! I managed to get the webservices-builder to
compile and pass the tests by using dependency exclusion and some
code
hack.
Now the connector-builder needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2723:
-
Attachment: configs.diff
modules.diff
The j2ee-builder
David J,
I have attached patches to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723. This is a first
step towards removing references to j2ee schemas. I might have
overlooked some finer points.
Suggestions for improvement are welcome..
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2723:
-
Attachment: modules.diff
The j2ee-builder module should use geronimo-schema
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464094
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2723:
--
updated modules.diff patch to include missing
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a
dependency.
Yikes!!
It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2716:
-
Attachment: testsupport.diff
Create javaee 5 test jars for j2ee-builder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463578
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Prasad,
I have attached a patch to this issue. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2716:
-
Attachment: testsupport.diff
Create javaee 5 test jars for j2ee-builder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463714
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2716:
--
Fixed in rev 494959 and 494971. Thanks Prasad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2716.
Resolution: Fixed
Create javaee 5 test jars for j2ee-builder tests
: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0-M2
Environment: All
Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
Fix For: 2.0-M2
The j2ee-builder should use classes from geronimo
;
ServiceEndpointMethodMappingType;
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar:
ConnectorDocument$Facty.class
ConnectorDocument.class
ConnectorType$Factory.class
ConnectorType.class
Have they been renamed/moved?
Thanks
Anita
The geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec jar is at 1.1-SNAPSHOT. Should it be
1.0-SNAPSHOT?
Thanks
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0-M2
Environment: All
Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
Fix For: 2.0-M2
Create ear, ejb-jar, rar, and war files for j2ee-builder tests that use
Thanks. I always wondered how it was working..
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r484869geronimo-server-trunk-pom.xml-p7769085.html
thanks
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I fixed GERONIMO-2686 in 1.2 but have not
Building openejb might help. Please see:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-ClassLoader%2C-JNDI-and-Dependency-views-in-console-p8216259.html
Thanks
Anita
--- Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I just did a fresh build with NO ERRORS !!! however I can not run
neither Jetty or Tomcat.
Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a dependency.
It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4 as
follows:
web-builder - geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec
naming-builder -- j2ee-schema --
geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4
Should naming-builder be
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:20 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Geronimo-web-2.5-builder uses geronimo-web-builder as a
dependency.
Yikes!!
It brings in geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec and geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4
as
follows:
web-builder - geronimo
The following classes are missing in geronimo-schema-jee-5 jar:
ConnectorDocument$Facty.class
ConnectorDocument.class
ConnectorType$Factory.class
ConnectorType.class
Have they been renamed/moved?
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- David Jencks [EMAIL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462478
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-1585:
--
This problem as described by Aaron is about url
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462484
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-1585:
--
Vamsi, Jérôme's observations are based
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462522
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2697:
--
The schemas are not being packaged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462669
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2607:
--
From a discussion on the mailing list:
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2607:
-
Attachment: kernel.diff
GoperationInfo should include the return type
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461736
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2683:
--
Maven quietly uses the first definition
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461738
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2675:
--
Fixed in branches/1.2 rev 491800
Fix geronimo
required work that you were tracking
before
marking this as complete on the roadmap?
Thanks
-Dave-
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Are we not including J2EE Management 1.1 in this list because of
JSR77.3.5.0.1 - deploymentDescriptor?
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461746
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2683:
--
patch applied to trunk rev 491817, Thanks Donald
Numerous problems have been reported with building 'assemblies' and
with the server resulting from these assemblies. Here are some of them:
Oct 19 -
http://www.nabble.com/Assembly-is-caching-old-junk-p6907158.html
Oct 31 -
http://www.nabble.com/More-car-maven-plugin-changes...-p7107517.html
Affects Versions: 2.0-M2
Environment: All
Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
The following assemblies are using car-maven-plugin without specifying a
version.
geronimo-framework/pom.xml:
artifactIdcar-maven-plugin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2675?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2675:
-
Description:
The following assemblies are using car-maven-plugin without specifying a
version.
geronimo-boilerplate-j2ee/pom.xml
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2675?page=comments#action_12460279
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2675:
--
Fixed in rev 489358. For the sake of consistency I have used ${version}. I
prefer using
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--vote--Release-geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0-p8013384.html
I like voting on binaries for most our stuff as our build is
massively complex. But in this case I figured I'd give the do you
trust me to build/publish
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2594?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2594.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
2.0-M1
(was: 2.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Add xalan to endorsed directory
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2629?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-2629.
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M1
(was: 2.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 483121
Upgrade to J2EE Management 1.1 (JSR77
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2666?page=comments#action_12459958
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2666:
--
org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextFlyweight class expects that method
getContext() should
Does anyone know why boilerplate-j2ee assembly (trunk) is using
1.2-SNAPSHOT version of car-maven-plugin?
Thanks
Anita
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Assemblies :: Boilerplate J2EE
[INFO]task-segment: [clean,
. branhes/1.2 and trunk. We need to add
version${version}/version to assemblies pom or the top level pom.
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know why boilerplate-j2ee assembly (trunk) is using
1.2-SNAPSHOT version of car-maven-plugin?
Thanks
Anita
or not. Be
sure to validate on a clean repo though...
--jason
On Dec 20, 2006, at 4:24 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The car plugin version is defined in configs pom. This
definition
is not inherited by assemblies pom and hence by boilerplate-j2ee
assembly. In the absence
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we have discussed before, if a plugin (with extensions) is used
*anywhere* in the build tree , maven makes sure that it is available
even before the projects are sorted. But that is not a problem with
our
two stage build, i.e. it builds
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and thus mvn release:perform will fail because of this.
Which directory/directories do you run this release command from?
Thanks
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best
to
actually run the test.
So basically The only way to make sure that the local jars/cars are
used is to do an offile build is not possible.
thanks,
dims
On 12/18/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
Anyone who
Are we not including J2EE Management 1.1 in this list because of
JSR77.3.5.0.1 - deploymentDescriptor?
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hogstrom
Date: Sun Dec 17 21:53:00 2006
New Revision: 488131
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=488131
Log:
Added
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN to ERROR (rev
488143)?
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have prepared 2.0-M1 for release. Of course all the hard work was
done by the lot of
It would be nice if this was included in 2.0-M1. It will allow clean
shutdown of the server without changing all the log levels from WARN to
ERROR.
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dims
Date: Sun Dec 17 19:18:42 2006
New Revision: 488106
URL:
The geronimo.log is empty. It does not contain system information.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which log is empty?
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I tried tomcat6-jee5:
-- The log file is empty.
-- Is it necessary to change all the log levels from WARN
Matt,
I had to change the following lines in server-log4j.properties to
get system information logged:
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE
log4j.appender.FILE.Threshold=INFO
In addition I see the following stack trace during shutdown. A fix
for this is already available in rev 488106:
).
thanks,
dims
On 12/16/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims, Joe, and Prasad
I wish I had seen this coming.. The compatibility of GBeanInfo
was
broken for 4 days (Dec 10th - Dec 14), while we discussed whether
we
should maintain this compatibility. In a perfect
Dims, Joe, and Prasad
I wish I had seen this coming.. The compatibility of GBeanInfo was
broken for 4 days (Dec 10th - Dec 14), while we discussed whether we
should maintain this compatibility. In a perfect world it would not
have mattered.. But sometimes Maven does not use locally built
:
Does it matter? That module was intended to be the basic setup for
the EE assemblies, which used to be *-j2ee, now are *-jee5
--jason
On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
JEE 5 assembly is using boilerplate-j2ee jar. Is this intended?
[INFO
, 2.0-M1
Environment: All
Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
Priority: Minor
Examining attributes of
j2eeType=JavaComponentContext,ServiceModule=rmi-naming/... using Jconsole gives
NPE. The environment attribute is shown as {} in JMXViewer. To reproduce this
start Geronimo
+1
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2666
Thanks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 1.2-beta release and all dependencies are cut and awaiting your
vote! All the files are available in a staging area in my home dir
on
people.
:354)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:363)
... 5 more
Server shutdown begun
Server shutdown completed
Thanks,
Joe
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks Dain!
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED
JEE 5 assembly is using boilerplate-j2ee jar. Is this intended?
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Assemblies :: Boilerplate JEE5
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
building multiple releases that caused it (I was
building
both trunk and 2.0-M1) but I'm not really certain.
Hope that helps,
Joe
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Joe,
Did you get past this? I am also unable to start
geronimo-tomcat6-jee5 built with rev 487196. However I can start
Thanks Dain!
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:32 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks Gianny, David J and Dain for providing feedback. I could
have
certainly used it before commiting rev 485321. IIUC, here is what
needs
to be done:
1. .Make
in GBeanInfoBuilder, not an
operation.
thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not allowed to have public Object getObjectName() and public
String
getObjectName() simultaneously.
--vamsi
On 12/11/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gianny
connection
Thanks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 11, 2006, at 8:33 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Prasad,
I am hoping that the fix Dain promised for the branch might
help
with this too..
I am waiting for it :)
On Dec 7, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom
Gianny,
Thanks for looking into this. I did consider the easy way out. But
the retrun type is part of the method signature. What happens if we
have
public class Myclass {
public Object getObjectName()
public String getObjectName()
..
}
If JMXUtil was patched which
The GOpeartionInfo has a field:
private final String methodName;
Which should really have been targetClass or returnType. Currently
it is initialized to the name of the method! If we must maintain
backward compatibility, I am open to suggestions..
Thanks
Anita
--- Gianny Damour [EMAIL
to have public Object getObjectName() and public
String
getObjectName() simultaneously.
--vamsi
On 12/11/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gianny,
Thanks for looking into this. I did consider the easy way out.
But
the retrun type is part of the method signature. What
It would be nice if before renaming/moving directories, a note
announcing the change could be sent to the list. This will give people
a chance to rename their local copies and avoid getting them wiped out
by an svn update.
Thanks
Anita
--- Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI -- the
://www.nabble.com/1.2-Beta-Tasks-p7744896.html
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The shutdown of geronimo-tomcat-minimal server produces this
trace:
12:34:10,671 INFO [root]
--
12:38:32,171 WARN [BasicLifecycleMonitor
or
marks a conflict and saves your files. I hope there is a way to
recover your lost changes.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 12/11/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if before renaming/moving directories, a note
announcing the change could be sent to the list
When I build cxf-builder from modules directory, I get this error:
Missing:
--
1) wsdl4j:wsdl4j:jar:1.6.1
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=wsdl4j -DartifactId=wsdl4j \
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=comments#action_12457239
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2607:
--
Updated all GBeans to use the new addOperation method in rev 485524
GoperationInfo should
Chris,
This commit added xalan to the assembly. Is it intentional?
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ccardona
Date: Wed Dec 6 21:14:16 2006
New Revision: 483346
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=483346
Log:
GERONIMO-2633 : SVK synchronization patch for
was made in branches/1.2 and so trunk is being synched
up.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Chris,
This commit added xalan to the assembly. Is it intentional?
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ccardona
Date: Wed Dec 6 21:14:16 2006
New
-minimal assembly. Without it, I cannot build
this assembly. Are you saying that without it, you can successfully
build this assembly?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 08/12/2006, at 2:57 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Gianny,
I have just built geronimo-jett6-jee5 rev 483465. I have a fully
answer. AFAIK this is
the
first patch that was applied. Reading your comment on G-2594 you
saying
xmlParserApis and xalan is not necessary in trunk so do we need to
revert this?
Thanks,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
hmm... This change was only meant for the branch. I wonder what
The openejb2 (url below) still builds 2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT. How
does this work?
Thanks
Anita
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb2
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 484898
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2607:
-
Attachment: modules.diff
The modules.diff patch adds two methods to GBeanInfoBuilder:
public void addOperation(String name, String
+1
Thanks
Anita
... although I think the shorter tomcat6
is perfectly clear and easier to type.
Other stuff:
axis axis1
cxf cxf1
openjpa openjpa1
I think this will really reduce confusion about what is running in a
server.
So, I'd like the tomcat modules to be
interesting... I use win xp and sun jdk, and have a fully functional
console with jetty6 server Revision: 483117. Now I always start the
server using bin\startup.
thanks
Anita
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this may have removed a bit too much :-)
Now, when attempting to
Gianny,
I have just built geronimo-jett6-jee5 rev 483465. I have a fully
functional console without xalan. Xalan was removed from the build in
the morning. It appears that someone accidentally added xalan to the
build later in the day. Please let me know if you need it for some
specific
Yes I am seeing this too. Still investigating..
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing the following stack trace when shutting down the jetty6
geronimo server in trunk. Anyone have a clue about why, if it is a
problem, and what we might do about it?
)
... 22 more
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The shutdown of geronimo-tomcat-minimal server produces this
trace:
12:34:10,671 INFO [root]
--
12:38:32,171 WARN [BasicLifecycleMonitor] Exception occured while
notifying
+1
Anita
--- Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're breaking our 2.0 release into milestones, it seems
appropriate for us to create some versions in JIRA for them so
features and defects can be targeted to them. (ex. 2.0-M1, 2.0-
M2...). If there aren't any objections,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2594?page=comments#action_12456001
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2594:
--
Fixed in rev 483063. Mac users please verify that it works for you. Thnaks Joe
and Kevan
Tranql uses an older version of commons-logging than the one used by
the kernel. Maven gets confused about the versions if the same jar is
used in two different scopes:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Another-really-strange-mysterious-build-error-p6294043.html
Thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana
Chris,
For 2.0-M1 I am planning to upgrade geronimo modules/configs to use
1.1 specs. I could ask Jacek to apply an openejb patch for us. We need
to upgrade tranql also eventually.
Thanks
Anita
--- Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Content
Chris,
If you are setup to publish the specs, could you please publish
j2ee_management 1.1 spec.
Thanks
Anita
--- anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
For 2.0-M1 I am planning to upgrade geronimo modules/configs to
use
1.1 specs. I could ask Jacek to apply an openejb
501 - 600 of 1462 matches
Mail list logo
