Board report time 2015-11

Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-18+-+November If I missed something please let me know

Re: Yoko used in IBM WAS Liberty server

So sorry about the egregious delay in my reply. :( > On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:53 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > I am pleased to finally be able to announce that the Yoko orb is now used in > IBM’s WAS Liberty application server, the first EE 7 certified application >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.4 1.9.0-alpha-2

+1 Tag builds fine, signatures and hashes match. Regards, Alan > On Sep 23, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release geronimo javamail 1.4, main reason is it is not usable > with some SMTP server using 1.8.x and

Board report time 2015-07

Here's the report that I sent to the board: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July If I missed something please let me know directly.

Re: Board report time 2015-04

this in the report? LieGrue, strub Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com: Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT]. LieGrue, strub Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com: I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result. I double checked and found

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com/ 2015-04-06 21:21 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com: We need to follow up w/ a [RESULT]. Did the artifacts get pushed out? Regards

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result. I double checked and found it. :) Regards, Alan On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Done AFAIK Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com mailto:l

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation-1.2 spec API

Time to wrap up this vote? :) Regards, Alan On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-annotation-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements the common-annotations JSR-250 MR-1.2 specification. The only

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

Time to wrap up this vote? :) Regards, Alan On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag. Can you at least tell us the svn revision? +1 - binding On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain

Board report time 2015-04

Here's my initial draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-interceptor-1.2 spec API

Time to wrap up this vote? :) Regards, Alan On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-interceptor-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements the interceptor MR-1.2 specification. The changes got tested via the

Geronimo on Docker?

I think that it would be pretty cool if we had Geronimo on Docker. How would we structure our images? Regards, Alan

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation-1.2 spec API

+1 Regards, Alan On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-annotation-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements the common-annotations JSR-250 MR-1.2 specification. The only change was the introduction of

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-interceptor-1.2 spec API

+1 Regards, Alan On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-interceptor-1.2_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements the interceptor MR-1.2 specification. The changes got tested via the ALv2 licensed CDI TCK.

ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2015

This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 April 2015, 10:30 am PST and the deadline for submitting your report is 1 full week prior to that (Wed, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi-1.1 spec API

+1 Regards, Alan On Mar 24, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec-1.0 jar. This is an API which implements the CDI-1.1 and 1.2 API and SPI and passes the CDI TCK. It also passes the method signature test of

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Geronimo XBean-4.2

+1 Regards, Alan On Mar 25, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'd like to release XBean 4.2 to be able to integrate it ASAP in the coming tomee releases. It fixes 2 impacting bugs: recursive algorithm (just fails for big jars) and linkParent

Re: Geronimo and jvisualvm

On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:02 AM, Marcin Wietecha marcin.wiete...@jeppesen.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to use jvisualvm (profiling tool included to JDK) to check application performance on Geronimo v3.0. I use JDK 1.7.0_71. App is web service oriented. However I can’t connect to server

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Alan Cabrera has been appointed as the new PMC Chair of the Geronimo Project

On Feb 19, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: All, Due to lack of time, in the last few months, I've found it very difficult to contribute and stay on top of Geronimo activities. So, last month I informed the PMC that I would like to step down as the PMC Chair of the

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag. Can you at least tell us the svn revision? +1 - binding On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, As stated in the other thread here the vote for the

Re: How was the table in SSLCipherSuiteDatabase for CORBA support constructed?

This looks like it was an OpenORB contribution: http://openorb.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openorb/SSL/src/main/org/openorb/orb/ssl/SSLCipherSuiteDatabase.java?revision=1.5view=markup

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Geronimo XBean-4.1 (take2)

+1 Regards, Alan On Oct 21, 2014, at 2:11 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! I've rolled another build (take2) for Geronimo XBean-4.1. This release mainly brings an important performance improvement for xbean-finder. The staging repo is

Re: [VOTE] release Geronimo XBean-4.1

So is this vote officially canceled? Regards, Alan On Oct 19, 2014, at 3:50 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Of course, if this has the same limitation then just go on and fix it the same way. Just ping me and I'll re-roll the release (or better do another try). LieGrue,

Re: Board report time

LGTM, thanks! Regards, Alan On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October If I missed

Re: [VOTE] release Geronimo Genesis 2.2

+1 Regards, Alan On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:13 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi! genesis is our parents project collector for all geronimo projects. The main changes for 2.2 have been the automatic enablement of the apache-rat plugin (Apache Creadur) and version updates of many

Re: [VOTE] a few spec alpha-1 versions

Can you add your keys to the Geronimo KEYS? Thanks! Regards, Alan On Aug 30, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi folks! I've just did run the releasing of a few EE7 spec artifacts * geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec * geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec *

Re: [VOTE] a few spec alpha-1 versions

I've found some problems: geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec-1.0-alpha-1: src/main/java/javax/annotation/Priority.java is missing the AL2 header geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec-1.0-alpha-1: src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/AfterTypeDiscovery.java is missing the AL2 header

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0

Is your signature in http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS? Regards, Alan On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: a little up since it makes 2 days the vote started already ;) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog:

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0

+1 Regards, Alan On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: a little up since it makes 2 days the vote started already ;) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau

KEYS file, where's the official location?

We seem to have two locations for our KEYS file, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS and http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS. Which one is the official one? Regards, Alan

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

There's no TCK for this spec? I imagine if it passes the TCK then we're good. Regards, Alan On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kevin, java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0

+1 looks good Regards, Alan On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Good evening! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API. The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK. The staging repo is

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 Regards, Alan On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata problems. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 Binaries:

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 Looks good. Regards, Alan On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:55 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, release rolled! Binaries: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.15/

Re: XBean 3.15 release?

+1 Regards, Alan On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:15 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone object if I roll an XBean 3.1.5 release? -David

Re: Board Report Time

+1 Regards, Alan On Oct 4, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: I created a draft board report for October: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October If I missed something please let me know of update the page.

SPAM: Local Computer Support for Business and Home

Sorry. My bad. Must resist moderating early in the morning before coffee. :( Regards, Alan On Sep 20, 2012, at 3:27 AM, Liz wrote: Hi, I heard you might need better computer support. The company I work for has affordable, local, fast, and friendly technicians to service your

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.10 (take 1)

+1 Regards, Alan On Apr 10, 2012, at 11:13 PM, David Blevins wrote: Binaries are up for consideration. Here's the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/ I assume this is what was being asked for to run on the 3.0-beta

Re: [VOTE] release YOKO 1.2 - 2nd attempt.

+1 Regards, Alan On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:16 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: [VOTE] release YOKO 1.2 - 2nd attempt. This is a bug fixes release for Java EE 6 compliance: The fixes in this release are: YOKO-431 Classloader issue when initializing a corba skeleton for EJB object YOKO-433 YOKO

Re: Availability spec compile error

Ha! I wonder why I never checked that in. Sorry! :) Regards, Alan On Mar 9, 2011, at 5:41 PM, David Blevins wrote: Any ideas? http://ci.apache.org/builders/specs-trunk/builds/2/steps/compile/logs/stdio -David

JSR 319: Availability Management for Java

The JSR was approved this summer. If no one minds I'm going to put this into specs. Regards, Alan

Re: JSR 319: Availability Management for Java

On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: The JSR was approved this summer. If no one minds I'm going to put this into specs. Can't think of any objections. Can't say that I've looked at the spec... Something you're going

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Xuan Dai Delos as a new Geronimo PMC member

Congrats! Regards, Alan On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Please join us in congratulating Delos as a new member of the Geronimo PMC. In addition to all his work on GEP and Samples, Delos also has demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas. We're

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Rex Wang as a new member of the Geronimo PMC

Congrats! Regards, Alan On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:00 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Please join us in congratulating as a new member of the Geronimo PMC. In addition to serving as a release manager for the Geronimo 2.1.5 server release, Rex also has demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Ming Xai Forrest as a new Geronimo PMC member

Congrats! Regards, Alan On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Please join us in congratulating Forrest as a new member of the Geronimo PMC. In addition to all his work on Samples, Forrest also has demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas. We're very

Re: [Need review] The mock UI for displaying bundle information

Very nice! On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:19 AM, Delos wrote: Hi all, OSGI Bundle is a new item for Geronimo admin console and RFC 139 defines many Mbeans used to get bundle information in OSGI environment. So it's necessary for admin console to show the information of OSGI bundles. Therefore,

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

On Sep 23, 2009, at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of Spring-DM being the RI of this spec). The code was

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

+1 On Sep 11, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded another 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussion thread. The staging repository is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:54, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a new 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the

Re: javadoc @version tags

On Sep 9, 2009, at 3:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:01 AM, David Jencks wrote: I was looking at the generated xbean site prior to releasing and noticed the version looks pretty messy with lots of random variations

Re: javadoc @version tags

On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:01 AM, David Jencks wrote: I was looking at the generated xbean site prior to releasing and noticed the version looks pretty messy with lots of random variations. I think we've previously encouraged something like this: * @version $Rev:$ $Date:$ which expands to

Re: [DISCUSS] Only Support Java SE 6 with Geronimo 2.2

On Nov 6, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Donald Woods wrote: The time has come to make the hard decision - Do we only build and certify Geronimo 2.2 on the Sun 1.6.0 JDK and drop support for running on Java SE 5? Pros: - Reduce testing effort to one version of Java - Allows us to use the JAXB 2.1,

Re: JSR 311

On Oct 26, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I was wondering if you guys know about an Apache licensed JSR 311 implementation ? I would checkout CXF: cxf.apache.org Regards, Alan

Re: JASPI as a component? JACC as a component?

Sounds good to me. Regards, Alan On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:55 AM, David Jencks wrote: I've been looking at JASPI lately, first working with jetty to base its authentication on jaspi, and now looking at implementing a provider for geronimo. I think it makes sense to have this as a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lin Sun is the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations! Regards, Alan On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Lin Sun as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. She has been involved with the Geronimo community for a long time and made great contributions as a committer and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Shiva Kumar H R as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Welcome aboard! Regards, Alan On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Shiva Kumar H R as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Shiva working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us

Re: FYI: Geronimo 2.0 Docs - Japanese Translation completed.

Outstanding! Regards, Alan On May 28, 2008, at 8:43 AM, 石田　剛 wrote: Hello, Geronimo-devs. We, The Japan Apache Geronimo Users Group , are proud to announce that we've completed all the Geronimo 2.0 documents translation. Now it's on the Geronimo Wiki.

Re: [VOTE] Release JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar version 1.0 (take 2)

+1 Regards, Alan On May 23, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Hi, JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar is used by Axis2 and CXF projects and it will help Geronimo in transition to JAX-WS 2.1. This is a very first release of the JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar. This version contains fixes for the problems Kevan

Re: Google Analytics

Thanks Dave. Can you add [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Alan On May 14, 2008, at 11:32 PM, David Blevins wrote: Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a committer who I could easily find a gmail address for. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Should we release 3.4?

Sounds good to me. Just curious, what did we add to get things to work for them? Regards, Alan On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I'd like to get release of xbean so we can release the new plexus code (yes plexus is now using xbean-reflect). -dain

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In the past months, I've been working on making the specs jars from Geronimo working in an OSGi environment. All these jars have been published and work great :-) However, lots of these spec jars define factories (stax, saaj for example)

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:49 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'd like to see an example in action before I commit myself but so far I don't see any problems with this. I assume you have already or will soon verify this doesn't cause problems with the tck :-) I wonder if a package name with osgi in

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

Sorry, I meant to say: On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:49 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'd like to see an example in action before I commit myself but so far I don't see any problems with this. I assume you have already or will soon verify

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

On Apr 17, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, lots of these spec jars define factories (stax, saaj for example) that use

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

. On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In the past months, I've been working on making the specs jars from Geronimo working in an OSGi environment. All these jars have been published and work great

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

specific thing everywhere we use a factory from a j2ee spec :-( On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 17, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 16

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

reasoning. On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I meant to say: On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:49 AM, David Jencks wrote: I'd like to see an example in action before I commit myself but so far I

Re: Geronimo specs jars in OSGi

be you want to deploy the jaxws-ri, jersey or any other xml related technology that could use SAAJ, Stax, Jaxb2 ... On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIUC, they're not entirely legacy, i.e. you at least put in the OSGi manifest entries. You do so

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Jason Warner as Geronimo's most recent committer

Congratulations! Regards, Alan On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: All, It is my privilege to announce that Jason has recently accepted an invitation to join the Apache Geronimo project. Jason has been working on Geronimo for a while now in multiple areas including J2G,

Java Service Wrapper

Something that we might need to look into. Regards, Alan -- Forwarded message -- From: Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:20 PM Subject: Java Service Wrapper To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Java Service Wrapper is being used (and sometimes redistributed)

Re: You do not have permission to view this page.

Done. BTW, it seems that you have two accounts on Confluence: jlaskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Alan On Mar 24, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, Who should I contact to in order to grant me permissions to edit XBean Wiki pages? Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski

Re: [PROPOSAL] Indent 2 spaces in xml and vm files to match more common usage, especially maven.

-0 I find 2 space indenting difficult to read. I'm sure that I'm misunderstanding something so take my reply with a grain of salt. On Mar 13, 2008, at 8:28 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Mar 13, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: -1. I don't think there is any value in making the indent

Re: using Resource Bundles for message strings

On Feb 26, 2008, at 7:30 AM, B.J. Reed wrote: I have written a patch to get Geronimo messages from a common set of resource bundles. Included in the patch is the GeronimoMessageBundle.java, GeronimoMessageBundleTest.java, and the start of the geronimo-messages.properties file. Neat!

Re: Connector problems

I thought that I knew JCA pretty well. What is a permit leak? Regards, Alan On Feb 9, 2008, at 1:22 AM, David Jencks wrote: Working with Tomasz Mazan we discovered that there was a permit leak in the connector pooling code (GERONIMO-3834). While fixing this I revamped quite a bit of the

Re: [VOTE] Release ws-metadata 2.0 spec, 1.1.2

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of ws-metadata 2.0 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release JSP 2.1 spec, v 1.0.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JSP 2.1 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release JPA 3.0 spec, v 1.1.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JPA 3.0 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release JACC 1.1 spec, v 1.0.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JACC 1.1 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release annotation 1.0 spec, v 1.1.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of annotations 1.0 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1 Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release EJB 3.0 spec, v 1.0.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 30, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Btw, here's my +1 On Jan 29, 2008 4:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've uploaded a release of EJB 3.0 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag:

Re: [VOTE] Release J2EE Management 1.1 spec, v 1.0.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of J2EE Management 1.1 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag:

Re: [VOTE] Release interceptor 3.0 spec, v 1.0.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of Interceptor 3.0 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Connector 1.5 spec, v 2.0

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of J2EE Connector 1.5 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0/

Re: [VOTE] Release JTA 1.1 spec, v 1.1.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JTA 1.1 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release SAAJ 1.3 spec, v 1.0

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vote. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/ Repo http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo- jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/

Re: [VOTE] Release JAXRPC 1.1 spec, v 2.0

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JAXRPC 1.1 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0/ Repo

Re: [VOTE] Release JAXR 1.0 spec, v 2.0

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a release of JAXR 1.0 spec for vote. The main change is that the jar is packaged as an OSGi bundle. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0/ Repo

[ANNOUNCE] XBean 3.3 released

The XBean team is pleased to announce a new official release of Apache XBean. Release Notes - XBean - Version 3.3 ** Bug * [XBEAN-99] - Xbean-spring 3.3-SNAPSHOT bundle included some optional dependencies as mandatory. * [XBEAN-101] - PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer can not be used

Re: Retire unused modules?

On Jan 23, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I think we have some modules that are no longer used by anyone and the developer has given up on them, and was wondering if we should retire them? Off the top of my head this is where we stand: Keep: xbean-classloader - Geronimo and

[YOKO] Heads up

I'm going to remove the WS that went to CXF tonight. Regards, Alan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Kevan Miller has been approved as the new PMC Chair for Apache Geronimo

On Jan 16, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Recently I have had several things change personally and I have found it increasingly difficult to keep up with the Geronimo mailing lists on a daily basis. As a result, I did some soul searching and decided that my intentions to stay on

[YOKO] Yoko web site

I want to start creating the new Yoko website and wiki. How do I do this? Regards, Alan

[YOKO] KEYS

I have removed all the keys but Rick's from the KEYS file since I do not recognize who they belong to. Yoko committers, please feel free to add your keys to this file. Regards, Alan

Re: [YOKO] Yoko web site

via svn? --jason -Original Message- From: Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:41:30 To:Developers Geronimo dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [YOKO] Yoko web site I want to start creating the new Yoko website and wiki. How do I do this? Regards, Alan

[YOKO] premature tools deletion?

I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools. It would be nice to have our own IDL compiler. I was thinking that we could move tools to a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up. Thoughts? Regards, Alan

Re: [YOKO]

On Jan 15, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Yoko ORB code still generates 1.4 compatible code. Since the ORB doesn't have any direct dependencies on Geronimo, it probably can be maintained as just being dependent on 1.4. On the other hand, there are many times I wished I could

Re: [YOKO]

On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: What cleanup steps need to be taken with the yoko code now that it's been made a subproject in Geronimo? The first obvious one would be to remove the non-core components from the trunk. The second would be to remove the incubating from

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager-2.1

+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:35 AM, David Blevins wrote: Discuss thread (for reference): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Changes since last release:

Re: ActiveMQ 5 for g 2.1?

On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:49 PM, David Jencks wrote: Anyone interested in seeing if we can upgrade to AMQ 5 for g 2.1? Apparently it has removed at least one of the annoying lets put a non-string in system properties behaviors AMQ 4 liked to foist on us. cf GERONIMO-3243 Sounds good to me.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >