: [VOTE] -- M5 release -- (Was Re: 1.0-M5
candidate build)
This vote has been running 24 hours. I realize now I was sloppy in
not designating a time.
I think that this thread shows that we agree to release this code,
and have found consensus on how to deal with the installer issue.
+1
This vote has been running 24 hours. I realize now I was sloppy in
not designating a time.
I think that this thread shows that we agree to release this code,
and have found consensus on how to deal with the installer issue.
+1 in favor : David J, David B, Geir, Jeff, Sachin, Alan, Matt,
I sent this last night and it never made it.
Resending as is.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: October 4, 2005 12:55:37 AM EDT
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] -- M5 release -- (Was Re: 1.0-M5
candidate build)
This vote
First, the good news:
All the tck tests pass for the 1.0-M5 candidate build for both jetty
and tomcat!
Unfortunately, there seems to be a problem with the
geronimo-installer.jar. It works fine for jetty but the tomcat
included does not seem to include GERONIMO-1036: the tomcat
How do we want to proceed?
As i understand it, the tgz and zip distros are done and tested, and
all is well. Can we release those and follow up with the installer
as soon as available?
geir
On Oct 3, 2005, at 2:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
First, the good news:
All the tck tests pass
If the installer will be ready tomorrow, can we just declare our
release party to be tomorrow and provide them all at once? I
would prefer that the installer not be a second-class citizen.
That said, if the installer would be ready tomorrow, I won't complain if everyone else wants to release
On Oct 3, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
If the installer will be ready tomorrow, can we just declare our
release party to be tomorrow and provide them all at once? I would
prefer that the installer not be a second-class citizen.
Agreed. I'm with you...
That said, if the
On 10/3/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 3, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: If the installer will be ready tomorrow, can we just declare our release party to be tomorrow and provide them all at once?I would prefer that the installer not be a second-class citizen.
I've modified my local copy of modules/assembly/maven.xml to do the
automated parts of building an installer from the distro zip file when
located in target/distributions and build an installer from the
geronimo-1.0-M5.zip file we tested. I'm attaching the diff for the
maven.xml. This
+1 if it gets us over the installer hump, and Aaron will vote +1 to
this thread...
On Oct 3, 2005, at 4:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've modified my local copy of modules/assembly/maven.xml to do the
automated parts of building an installer from the distro zip file
when located in
I may not yet have voted although I think my sentiments are clear
already:
+1 to releasing the zip now
+1 to releasing the installer jar now.
david jencks
On Oct 3, 2005, at 1:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've modified my local copy of modules/assembly/maven.xml to do the
automated parts of
On Oct 2, 2005, at 11:40 PM, David Jencks wrote:
First, the good news:
All the tck tests pass for the 1.0-M5 candidate build for both
jetty and tomcat!
Unfortunately, there seems to be a problem with the geronimo-
installer.jar. It works fine for jetty but the tomcat included
does not
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins and I
have tagged geronimo and openejb and built a candidate 1.0-M5
+1 from me.
Jeff
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins and I
have tagged
+ 1
Sachin
Jeff Genender wrote:
+1 from me.
Jeff
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so
Cool. Can you publish a candidate installer, too?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
+1
Thanks again guys!
Regards,
Alan
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 10/2/2005 5:31 AM:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck
Commons Logging w/ context priority works... :-)
Running the M5 build and starting the console, I see the following log entries sent to STDOUT:
Starting the console:
11:05:09,066 WARN [Servlet]
org.apache.pluto.portalImpl.Servlet#init(): Couldn't read property
pluto.allowSetBufferSize from
+1
-dain
On Oct 2, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
Thanks again guys!
Regards,
Alan
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 10/2/2005 5:31 AM:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15
I don't know if I even carry voting rights here. But I'll try anyway.
-1
JavaMail functionality is currently broken in the binary release that
David made available. Of course if this isn't a 'must fix' for M5, then
feel free to disregard my vote.
Cheers.
-Neal
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Cool. Can you publish a candidate installer, too?
well, I'm not sure. I see two potential problems, aside from being too
tired right now to put it together :-)
1. We aren't set up to certify it, how would we make it clear that the
Sorry, I thought you had figured out the installer issue. We should
certainly be able to build it from the same files as we distribute
normally. Where does it stand now? I can tweak it if you've run out
of energy for it.
The installer also has a scripted/automated install process, which
should
+1
Gianny
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins
Well, as soon as IzPack 3.8 goes final, it should be in Maven -- the
previous release is. I would be happy to make that a condition of
Geronimo 1.0, but I don't think it's necessary for M5.
It's fine with me if the installer is build by unpacking the assembly zip.
Aaron
On 10/2/05, David
Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to vote?
:)
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Well, as soon as IzPack 3.8 goes final, it should be in Maven -- the
previous release is. I would be happy to make that a condition of
Geronimo 1.0, but I don't
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to vote?
I would like to vote -1 until there's an installer package available,
but it seemed like it would be rude. So now I'm hoping that the vote
drags on long enough for
Neal Sanche wrote:
I don't know if I even carry voting rights here. But I'll try anyway.
-1
JavaMail functionality is currently broken in the binary release that
David made available. Of course if this isn't a 'must fix' for M5,
then feel free to disregard my vote.
Okay, I feel fickle
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to vote?
I would like to vote -1 until there's an installer package available,
but it seemed like it would be rude. So now
On Oct 3, 2005, at 12:11 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to
vote?
I would like to vote -1 until there's an installer package available,
but it seemed like it would be rude. So
Excellent!
The post I just hit send for is moot...
geir
On Oct 3, 2005, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to
vote?
I
Ta-da!
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/geronimo-installer.jar
-David
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care
+1 from me.
On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(just making it clear for others)
+1 from me
Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
geir
On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David
32 matches
Mail list logo
