Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-21 Thread Delos
I will start GEP M1 release soon. 2010/6/21 Bill Stoddard wgstodd...@gmail.com On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-21 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-21 Thread Forrest Xia
I will start Samples 3.0-M1 release soon. Forrest On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-20 Thread Bill Stoddard
On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for

[RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-18 Thread Rick McGuire
The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick On 6/9/2010 4:13

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-18 Thread Donald Woods
Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-) -Donald On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-18 Thread Rick McGuire
On 6/18/2010 8:24 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-) Yeah...it's been a rough morning! Rick -Donald On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-16 Thread Donald Woods
On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I don't think have been pointed out yet: Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-15 Thread Kevan Miller
Here's my +1. Build, source, signatures, checksums, license/notice files all look good. Some minor issues running the server: ExceptionInInitializerError during shutdown of Jetty server warnings during start of Tomcat Java EE server Here's my +1 --kevan On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Rick

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-15 Thread Joe Bohn
Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I don't think have been pointed out yet: Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this isn't a big concern because they should

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release. Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server. -Donald On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: +0.5 M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to the local loopback device

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Donald, I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK 1.6.0_20. Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the tag? On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
Those versions on Mac What problem did you encounter? Did you run the bootstrap build first? mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap mvn install -Donald On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Donald, I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Ah... missed the bootstrap build step :D . The build seems to run fine now. Will post again if it fails. Thanks Donald. On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: Those versions on Mac What problem did you encounter? Did you run the bootstrap build first?

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-10 Thread Jarek Gawor
+0.5 M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 10, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: +0.5 M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by setting the ServerHostname

[VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-09 Thread Rick McGuire
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220