://old.nabble.com/Draft-of-2.0.2-Performance-Report-tp13357025s134p26525262.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think that article details the method about how to perform an out-of-box
performance testing on JEE 5 compliant java application servers, including G
2.2. User can follow it to do a simple and quick benchmark, and make choice
accordingly.
Forrest
matt... just did an initial look. just a few comments for now...
- were there funcational/load issues with the daytrader 1.2 numbers that
were omitted?
- was really surprised by the slow down in the web container primitives
(probably has to do with the spec upgrade) and the jump in direct mode
Hi Matt,
This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
Here is my feedback on it-
- Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like
enough spelled ebnough
- The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you
used in the last report,
ah... piyush raises a good point regarding the session 2 direct mode. this
is provided by both daytrader 1.2 and 2.0 and is one of the more common
patterns we see out in the j2ee community.
chris
On 10/23/07, Piyush Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
This is a great report .. thanks
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
matt... just did an initial look. just a few comments for now...
- were there funcational/load issues with the daytrader 1.2 numbers
that were omitted?
Not really. The runs were clean, CPU was high and all the
fundamentals seemed
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
Hi Matt,
This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
Here is my feedback on it-
Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like
enough spelled ebnough
what is a spell checker ?
The Introduction on
Hi Matt,
Page 9 mentions -
SO F T WA R E
Operating System:
SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise SP1
2.6.16.46-0.4-smp #1 SMP Mon Apr 2 17:59:08 UTC
2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The OS version is missing SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise 10 SP1
As for JIBE, If you have the .log files which go
Thanks. Amazing what you can read when you know the answer.
On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
Hi Matt,
Page 9 mentions -
SO F T WA R E
Operating System:
SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise SP1
2.6.16.46-0.4-smp #1 SMP Mon Apr 2 17:59:08 UTC
2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
As for JIBE, If you have the .log files which go with the xml files
its easy as they have the complete JIBE output captured verbatim
which you can copy paste in the report. I dont know any automated
way of getting the numbers from the XML... seems it does summarize
the run at the end
Unfortunately I dont have any such script for parsing the xml... if you have
used a sync-engine for the 2 jibe machines then its log files might have
merged data.
On 10/23/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for JIBE, If you have the .log files which go with the xml files
its
I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
gander at what I have for the performance report at this point. This
is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0. There are a few numbers
that are missing. I originally had planned on not producing them but
the charts look odd
12 matches
Mail list logo
