Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-29 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi Jarek, yes, the intent is for the module builders to get updated deployment plan so that Tomcat, Jetty, etc will do the resource lookups with JNDI just like they do currently. There has been some discussions on the devlist (started by Sachin) as to whether we want or should accommodate

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-24 Thread Paul McMahan
On 1/22/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim, A couple of questions on the design/implementation: 1) Since the module builders will get an updated deployment descriptors, in general, the annotation processors in Tomcat, Jetty, Web services, EJB, etc. will just need to lookup the

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-24 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: On 1/22/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim, A couple of questions on the design/implementation: 1) Since the module builders will get an updated deployment descriptors, in general, the annotation processors in Tomcat, Jetty, Web

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-17 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 1/17/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the link to the URL diagrams: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/jsr-88-12.html They're nice! What UML tool do you use? -- The first is just a diagram of the pertinent high-level use cases for JSR-88 1.2 I'm not sure how one can

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-17 Thread Joe Bohn
Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, I still think there needs to be a general consensus for the handling of annotations in Geronimo. So, to better explain this design proposal I've created a few simple UML diagrams that demonstrates how it might work with one of the Geronimo builders--i.e. Tomcat.

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-17 Thread Paul McMahan
On 1/17/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I still think there needs to be a general consensus for the handling of annotations in Geronimo. So, to better explain this design proposal I've created a few simple UML diagrams that demonstrates how it might work with one of the Geronimo

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-17 Thread anita kulshreshtha
--- Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I still think there needs to be a general consensus for the handling of annotations in Geronimo. So, to better explain this design proposal I've created a few simple UML diagrams that demonstrates how it might work with one of the Geronimo

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-17 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi Jacek, Thanks for reviewing Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 1/17/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the link to the URL diagrams: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/jsr-88-12.html They're nice! What UML tool do you use? Rational Software Architect v7 (it's much improved over

Re: JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-17 Thread Tim McConnell
anita kulshreshtha wrote: --- Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I still think there needs to be a general consensus for the handling of annotations in Geronimo. So, to better explain this design proposal I've created a few simple UML diagrams that demonstrates how it might work

JSR-88 1.2 Proposed Design for Geronimo Annotation Processing

2007-01-16 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi, I still think there needs to be a general consensus for the handling of annotations in Geronimo. So, to better explain this design proposal I've created a few simple UML diagrams that demonstrates how it might work with one of the Geronimo builders--i.e. Tomcat. Here's the link to the URL