Mmkay :-)
--jason
On Nov 1, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Move it ;-)
Kevan Miller wrote:
No, not in my opinion. I haven't heard of any dissenters. There's
been
plenty of time for someone to raise an objection. I say -- have at
it...
--kevan
On 11/1/07, *Jason Dillon*
So shall we move the project out of the sandbox? Do we need an
official vote for this?
--jason
On Oct 26, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
i think the subject is explicit. What do people think about that ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog:
No, not in my opinion. I haven't heard of any dissenters. There's been
plenty of time for someone to raise an objection. I say -- have at it...
--kevan
On 11/1/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So shall we move the project out of the sandbox? Do we need an
official vote for this?
Thanx Kevan.
+1.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/26/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Here's my list:
Pro's
* Easier for other projects to
I'm obviously +1 for a sub-project ;-)
--jason
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Here's my list:
Pro's
* Easier for other
+1 Jason's +1
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'm obviously +1 for a sub-project ;-)
--jason
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list
Good explanation.
+1 to making it a subproject.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Here's my list:
Pro's
* Easier for other projects to reuse GShell
i think the subject is explicit. What do people think about that ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Thanx
Prasad
On 10/26/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think the subject is explicit. What do people think about that ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Here's my list:
Pro's
* Easier for other projects to reuse GShell
* Release cycle not tied to Geronimo server release cycle
Con's
* Small
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Here's my list:
Pro's
* Easier for other projects to reuse GShell
* Release cycle not tied
Good explanation Kevan.
Seems like it makes sense to be a sub-project. IIUC there isn't a very
tight coupling between Geronimo and GShell since the Geronimo specifics
are in the command modules. So there is value to be gained in GShell
being a subproject.
Joe
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct
+1
Jay
Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think the subject is explicit.
What do people think about that ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Makes sense to me. +1 for gshell as a subproject.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list the pros and cons.
Here's my list:
Pro's
*
+1 from me.
On 10/26/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes sense to me. +1 for gshell as a subproject.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone
15 matches
Mail list logo
