[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

The vote has passed with 5 PMC +1 votes, 2 other +1 votes and no other votes. I'll proceed with next steps. The version number on the GROOVY_3_0_X branch will become 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

Fantastic news! +1 — Graeme Rocher > On 9 Feb 2020, at 15:53, John Wagenleitner > wrote: > >  > +1 (binding) > >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020, 12:43 AM Paul King wrote: >> >> Dear development community, >> >> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0 release! >> >> This release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

+1 (binding) On Fri, Feb 7, 2020, 12:43 AM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0 release! > > This release includes 15 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

+1 (binding) Hooray! Sent from my primitive tricorder > On 8 Feb 2020, at 19:50, Daniel.Sun wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > All tests pass on my local machine: > https://scans.gradle.com/s/rntcuyeb4mtjc > > Also, I built the binary distribution from the source distribution > successfully: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

+1 On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:43 PM Paul King wrote: > > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0 release! > > This release includes 15 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

+1 (binding) All tests pass on my local machine: https://scans.gradle.com/s/rntcuyeb4mtjc Also, I built the binary distribution from the source distribution successfully: https://gradle.com/s/h25t4se4fqhra At last, I ran smoke tests in the groovySh and groovyConsole of the newly built binary

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

+1 (binding) I'm super excited to see Groovy 3 released soon! So I built the project from sources, ran all the tests, everything went fine. Here's the Gradle build scan: https://gradle.com/s/p3bm5etd4ig46 I also tried a few lines in the Grooovy Console without any issue (including things

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0 release! This release includes 15 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12345566 Tag:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3

The vote has passed with 4 +1 binding votes, one additional +1 vote and no other votes. I'll proceed with next steps. Cheers, Paul. On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:11 AM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3 release! > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3

+1 (binding) Sent from my primitive tricorder > On 12 Jan 2020, at 1:12, Paul King wrote: > >  > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3 release! > > This release includes 26 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3

All tests pass on my local machine: https://gradle.com/s/auet7ssjbdxns My smoke tests run well in the groovy console and groovy shell, which are built from the source distribution too. +1 (binding) Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3

+1 (binding) On 12.01.20 02:07, Remko Popma wrote: +1 On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:12 AM Paul King wrote: Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3 release! This release includes 26 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3

+1 On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:12 AM Paul King wrote: > > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3 release! > > This release includes 26 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: >

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-3 release! This release includes 26 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12346592 Tag:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2

The vote has passed with 4 +1 binding votes and no other votes. I'll proceed with next steps. Cheers, Paul. On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:40 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2 release! > > This release includes 49 bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2

+1 (binding) --- Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast http://andresalmiray.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray -- What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2

groovySh and groovyConsole run well, my smoke tests pass too. +1 (binding) Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2

Hi, All tests ran fine on my machine, and my smoke tests in the groovy console were okay too. +1 (binding) Guillaume On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 6:41 AM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2 release! > > This release

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-2 release! This release includes 49 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12346448 Tag:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

The vote has passed with 3 +1 binding votes and no other votes. I'll proceed with next steps. Regards, Paul. On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:01 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 release! > > This release includes 52

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

We create antlr4 plugin factory via the following code in `Antlr4Util`: Antlr4PluginFactory antlr4PluginFactory = (Antlr4PluginFactory) ParserPluginFactory.antlr4(configuration); The `antlr4` method is `static`, its implementation is to `new Antlr4PluginFactory` instance, and the method can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

_ From: Daniel.Sun Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 12:18 PM To: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2) The `static` method `antlr4` only creates `Antlr4PluginFactory` instance, so I wo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

The `static` method `antlr4` only creates `Antlr4PluginFactory` instance, so I wonder how to make it create `org.codehaus.groovy.control.ParserPluginFactory$1` instance? public abstract class ParserPluginFactory { /** * creates the ANTLR 4 parser * @return the factory for the parser

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

I think I understand the reason why `ClassCastException` will be thrown, but it is not a common case, in other words, we usually only use `AntlrParserPluginFactory` and `Antlr4ParserPluginFactory`. Anyway, we should tweak the code. Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

Hi Eric, Could you show us the code to reproduce the following `ClassCastException`? Thanks. java.lang.ClassCastException: org.codehaus.groovy.control.ParserPluginFactory$1 cannot be cast to org.apache.groovy.parser.antlr4.Antlr4PluginFactory at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

_ From: Milles, Eric (TR Tech, Content & Ops) Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 11:27 AM To: dev@groovy.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2) Even if Ivy 2.5.0 is released soon, we have not tested with that version. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2) FYI. Ivy 2.5.0 is coming soon too: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ant.1045680.n5.nabble.com_VOTE-2DRelease-2DIvy-2D2-2D5-2D0-2Dbased-2Don-2DRC1-2Dtd5719982.html=DwICAg=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

FYI. Ivy 2.5.0 is coming soon too: http://ant.1045680.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Ivy-2-5-0-based-on-RC1-td5719982.html Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

Yeah I just find it funny, when you release a "release candidate" knowing it's not a release candidate :) Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 17:40, Daniel.Sun a écrit : > Hi Cédric, > > > To me, it _implies_ that there will be a 3.0 rc2 for Groovy. > Yep ;-) As Paul said, one part which has only

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

Hi Cédric, > To me, it _implies_ that there will be a 3.0 rc2 for Groovy. Yep ;-) As Paul said, one part which has only recently been finished and still needs a bit more polishing is a revamped groovydoc. So 3.0.0-rc-2 will be released after groovydoc has been polished. 3.0.0-rc-1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

That's a bit surprising of a release candidate, IMO. A release candidate should mean "hey if there's no bug report, that's _exactly_ that that we publish as final". Here you're saying that in any case, you're going to change the dependency to Ivy. To me, it _implies_ that there will be a 3.0 rc2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

If Ivy 2.5.0 GA is not released before Groovy 3.0.0 GA, we have to downgrade Ivy to 2.4.0 GA. Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

Was the decision to stick with Ivy 2.5.0-rc1? There was a question of stability.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

+1 (binding) All tests pass on my local machine, here is the report of build scan: https://gradle.com/s/4bhflb27misl2 Also, I tested groovySh and groovyConsole manually and found no issues. Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

+1 (binding) Build and tests are running fine, and I played with the Groovy console without noticing any problem. Guillaume On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:01 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 release! > > This

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 (take 2)

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 release! This release includes 52 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12345982 Groovy 3 is nearing lockdown status

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1

Usually, the wrapper creation used to work across a wide range of Gradle versions. Then, once the required Gradle version is installed, we indeed use that specific version. But I was expecting that I could at least generate the wrapper as usual, regardless of the version of Gradle I had locally

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1

We found a few issues. I'll rebuild. On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:19 PM Paul King wrote: > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 release! > > This release includes over 50 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1

As the README says, you need to use the Gradle version which is declared in gradle.properties, which is 5.6.3 for this release. Le mar. 22 oct. 2019 à 11:51, Guillaume Laforge a écrit : > QQ, it's perhaps just a Gradle issue, but with the local version of Gradle > I have (Gradle 5.3.1), I can't

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1

QQ, it's perhaps just a Gradle issue, but with the local version of Gradle I have (Gradle 5.3.1), I can't create the wrapper and I get: ↳ gradle -b wrapper.gradle wrapper FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * Where: Settings file

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-rc-1 release! This release includes over 50 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12345982 Groovy 3 is nearing lockdown

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-3

The vote has passed with 4 +1 binding votes and no other votes. I'll proceed with next steps. Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-3

> But by the way, I really like the new syntax highlighter. The new syntax highlighter is based on the Parrot parser, so it should be smarter than the old one, which is based on regex. Glad to know you like it ;-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-3

I'll be happy to create an issue... but I still haven't managed to reproduce the issue :-( I was messing with nested gstring expressions, different kind of strings, including slashy strings, but I can't find the combination I used that troubled the syntax highlighter. But by the way, I really

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-3

Hi Guillaume, > I've cleared the console and didn't get a chance to copy it, but if I > reproduce the problem again, I'll tell you. OK. Feel free to submit a JIRA issue. I will try to fix it in the next release ;-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

No problems, it slipped through our voting process. I know that wasn't one of the things I was looking for this time since I checked that previously for the earlier fixes. We can do another release in a week or two. If everyone can check on the other features in the release, that would be great -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

I built Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 with JDK8... so the illegal warnings will come back when users use JDK9+... My bad :( - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

Releasing Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 is nearly completed except for updating the groovy-lang web site, which may take more time... Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

The vote has passed with 5 +1 PMC votes and 1 additional +1 vote. I'll proceed with next steps later. Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

+1 On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:27 AM Daniel.Sun wrote: > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 release! > > This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

+1 (binding) On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:42 PM Paul King wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked CHECKSUMs, signatures. > Code builds and test suite runs from source. > Ran some manual exploratory tests for groovy, groovyc, groovydoc, > groovysh, groovyConsole. > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:27 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

+1 (binding) Checked CHECKSUMs, signatures. Code builds and test suite runs from source. Ran some manual exploratory tests for groovy, groovyc, groovydoc, groovysh, groovyConsole. On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:27 AM Daniel.Sun wrote: > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

I ran all the tests and did my usual smoke tests with the console, and everything went well. +1 (binding) Guillaume On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:27 PM Daniel.Sun wrote: > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 release! > > This release

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 release! This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12345498 Tag:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1

The vote has passed with 4 +1 binding votes and no other votes. I'll proceed with next steps. Cheers, Paul. On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:13 AM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1 release! > > This release includes 107

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1

+1 (binding) --- Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast JCP EC Associate Seat http://andresalmiray.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray -- What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1

+1 (binding) All tests pass on my local machine. Here is the result of build scan: https://gradle.com/s/kms2iqrga5yyi Cheers, Daniel.Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1

+1 (binding) Super exciting to see the beta coming! Tests ok / built from sources. Smoke tests within the console, fine, including some Parrot tests (with lambdas, method references, etc) Build scan: https://gradle.com/s/q544wgpi3szi4 Guillaume On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:13 AM Paul King wrote:

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-beta-1 release! This release includes 107 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12344761 Tag:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

Jochen :-) - Apache Groovy committer Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

+1 On 29.12.18 04:11, Remko Popma wrote: +1 On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:39, John Wagenleitner mailto:john.wagenleit...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:58 PM Paul King > wrote: Dear development community, I am happy to start

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

+1 > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:39, John Wagenleitner > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:58 PM Paul King wrote: >> >> Dear development community, >> >> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4 release! >> This is expected to be the last "alpha"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:58 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4 release! > This is expected to be the last "alpha" release for Groovy 3. > With 2019 upon us, it's time to put our focus on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

+1 (binding) No issues with tests or anything. My smoke tests passed just fine (playing in the console basically) Guillaume On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:10 AM Daniel Sun wrote: > > With 2019 upon us, it's time to put our focus on completing this next > version of Groovy! > Agreed. > > Cheers, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

> With 2019 upon us, it's time to put our focus on completing this next version of Groovy! Agreed. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4

+1 (not binding) Get the show on the road! :-) Best regards / Med venlig hilsen, Søren Berg Glasius Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry, Denmark Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88, Skype: sbglasius --- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes. On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 21:58, Paul King wrote: > > Dear

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

The vote has passed with four +1 PMC votes and one additional +1 vote. I'll proceed with next steps. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:15 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3 release! > This version is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:15 PM Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3 release! > This version is intended to be released at the same time as Groovy > 2.6.0-alpha-4 > and is the recommended next version of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

+1 (binding) My usual manual tests (in the console), with a few tests with the Parrot syntax. All was fine for me. Guillaume On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 10:12 AM Russel Winder wrote: > > +1 > > -- > Russel. > === > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

+1 -- Russel. === Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

Thanks for the quick response. The asciidoc warnings are related to merging subproject and main ascidoc files (relative paths go astray). They can safely be ignored since once merged all is fine but if you can think of a nice way to get rid of the warnings I'm keen to know. ;-) Cheers, Paul. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

Built and tested from source. There are 6 javadoc warnings > Task :javadoc /Users/aalmiray/Downloads/groovy-3.0.0-alpha-3/src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/memoize/StampedCommonCache.java:39: warning - Tag @link: can't find getAndPut(K, ValueProvider) in

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3 release! This version is intended to be released at the same time as Groovy 2.6.0-alpha-4 and is the recommended next version of Groovy for users of JDK8 and above. This release includes 40 bug

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

Thanks everyone. The vote has passed with 3 binding +1 votes and two additional +1 votes. I'll proceed with next steps. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

Thanks for your voting :-) -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

> > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2 > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2 because... > +1 I base my vote not on the distribution, but on building master/HEAD, but this is an alpha release and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

Thank you all for setting aside some time to verify and vote :-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, builds and run tests from source. Ran some minimal tests with the produced artifacts from the src build. Nice work Daniel! Cheers, Paul. On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I did my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

+1 (binding) I did my usual smoke tests with the swing console. Nothing particular to report. On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 4:42 AM, John Wagenleitner < john.wagenleit...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Daniel.Sun wrote: > >> Dear development

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

+1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Daniel.Sun wrote: > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2 release! > > This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: >

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-2 release! This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123=12342254 Tag:

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Sorry for the confusion - I suppose the key sentence in voting.html is "Releases may not be vetoed" :) Burt On 11/28/2017 10:17 PM, Daniel Sun wrote: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Veto Have I misunderstood the statements? -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Isn't a -1 vote a veto? Burt On 11/28/2017 07:18 PM, Daniel Sun wrote: Thanks everyone! The vote has passed with 3 +1 binding votes, one additional +1 vote and one -1 vote. I'll get started with next steps later. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Hi Leonard, No luck for me... I run `gradlew --stop` and `gradlew clean dist --no-daemon`, still failed with the same error... Even if I disabled the daemon via adding `org.gradle.daemon=false` in gradle.properties, failed again... Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Thanks everyone! The vote has passed with 3 +1 binding votes, one additional +1 vote and one -1 vote. I'll get started with next steps later. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Hi Daniel, we have the same issue in spock, when a file produced by the build is used by gradle later on the daemon keeps it locked. Make sure that no daemon is already running, `gradlew --stop` then `gradlew clean dist --no-daemon` should work Cheers -Leonard P.S. As Paul suggested I'd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

I tried `gradlew dist --no-daemon`, still failed... --- FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file: D:\_APPS\git_apps\groovy\target\bootstrap\groovy-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-bootstrap.jar > Unable to delete file: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

OK. I'll disable the daemon and try again on Win10. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

+1 (binding) Validated checksums and signatures for binary and src zips. Ran gradle wrapper, gradlew dist and gradlew test on the src distro. Tried various tests of the convenience binaries in the binary zip. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Daniel.Sun wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Win 10. I possibly also have the daemon disabled by default - it only seems to cause many problems on Windows. I haven't checked with and without to see if there is a difference. Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Sun wrote: > Hi Paul, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Hi Paul, What's your Windows version? Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Actually, "gradle dist" (without the "clean") seemed to work fine on Windows. Given that our src distro should start as "clean", I think just removing clean from the instructions might be a better solution than requiring a specific platform. Still a bug in Gradle lurking there perhaps but we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

+1 (binding) Am 25.11.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Daniel.Sun: Dear community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1 release! This release includes 9 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Gotcha :-) Thanks for your reminding. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Daniel.Sun wrote: > BTW, building from source code have to be done on Linux(Fails on Windows > 10). > For future reference, if building from source doesn't work on a particular platform then we really ought to mention that in the README.adoc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

2.5 is not in alpha. It is close to final beta with RCs coming soon. 2.6 is 2.5 plus Parrot parser for JDK7+ (Parrot parser not enabled by default) 3.0 is 2.5 plus Parrot parser for JDK8+ (Parrot parser enabled by default) Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Cédric Champeau

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

Execution failed for task ':clean' after gradle upgraded from 3.5.1 to 4.3.1 https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/3437 -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

BTW, building from source code have to be done on Linux(Fails on Windows 10). Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-1

-1 because I think it's too confusing for users to have 2.5-alpha, 2.6-alpha and 3.0-alpha to test concurrently. I, for one, am lost and cannot keep track of what is in each release. 2017-11-25 14:03 GMT+01:00 Daniel.Sun : > Dear community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE

  1   2   >