: Zach York [mailto:zyork.contribut...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 3:28 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Considering branching for 1.5 and other branch-1 release planning
> If someone else is using 1.3 your feedback would be very
valuable.
EMR has shipped the 1.3 line since
> If someone else is using 1.3 your feedback would be very
valuable.
EMR has shipped the 1.3 line since EMR 5.4.0 (March 08, 2017). We have not
ran into any unresolved critical issues and it has been fairly stable
overall.
I would be a +1 on moving the stable pointer.
Thanks,
Zach
On Mon, Feb 5
Thanks so much for the feedback Francis.
I think we are just about there to move the stable pointer.
On Feb 5, 2018, at 9:48 AM, Francis Liu wrote:
>> If someone else is using 1.3 your feedback would be very
> valuable.
>
> We are running 1.3 in production, full rollout ongoing. Ran into so
> If someone else is using 1.3 your feedback would be very
valuable.
We are running 1.3 in production, full rollout ongoing. Ran into some
issues but it's generally been stable. We'll prolly gonna be on 1.3 for a
while.
Cheers,
Francis
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:59 AM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> H
Hi Ted,
If Hadoop 3 support is in place for an (eventual) 1.5.0 release, I think
that would be great.
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Andrew:
> Do you think making 1.5 release support hadoop 3 is among the goals ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Purtell
Andrew:
Do you think making 1.5 release support hadoop 3 is among the goals ?
Cheers
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The backport of RSGroups to branch-1 triggered the opening of the 1.4 code
> line as branch-1.4 and releases 1.4.0 and 1.4.1.
>
> After the commit of HBAS
> What are the gate criteria on moving the stable pointer?
We were waiting on feedback from Mikhail or Gary. Last I heard was it was
fine over there, except one use case would trigger occasional regionserver
aborts due to FNFE in storefile handling. HBASE-19728 is the latest to fix
issues around s
What are the gate criteria on moving the stable pointer?
IIRC there was intent to do another 1.2.x release where Sean passed the
reigns (Appy, still interested?)
You've been putting in a lot of hours into release duties already, Andrew,
let's hope that somebody else is available.
If it can wait u
Also, the next expected release for branch-1.4, 1.4.2, will be proposed at
the end of March.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The backport of RSGroups to branch-1 triggered the opening of the 1.4 code
> line as branch-1.4 and releases 1.4.0 and 1.4.1.
>
> After the commit
The backport of RSGroups to branch-1 triggered the opening of the 1.4 code
line as branch-1.4 and releases 1.4.0 and 1.4.1.
After the commit of HBASE-19858 (Backport HBASE-14061 (Support CF-level
Storage Policy) to branch-1), storage policy aware file placement might be
useful enough to trigger a
10 matches
Mail list logo