+1 to 0.92 as well.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
This increases the efficiency of a hbase cluster tremendously. +1 for
committing it earlier rather than later.
-dhruba
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for 0.92. This has received a lot of testing and code review internally. We
have already found/fixed a number of advanced bugs before even submitting the
initial patch. Very high quality.
On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:18 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Shall we commit the patch at
+1 to the idea of putting it in. I'm going to try to do a code review
tonight. If we could hold off a day or so to commit I'd appreciate it... but
if other stuff is blocked on it, go ahead whenever IMO.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
nspiegelb...@fb.comwrote:
+1 for 0.92.
+1 for 0.92
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:27 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Move hfile to v2 for 0.92 rather than 0.94?
+1 to the idea of putting it in. I'm going to try to do a code review
)
From: Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Move hfile to v2 for 0.92 rather than 0.94?
+1
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Shall we commit the patch at
https
: [DISCUSSION] Move hfile to v2 for 0.92 rather than 0.94?
+1
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Shall we commit the patch at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3857 for 0.92?
I reviewed it and its high-quality, with lots of new tests, and an
attention
I think this should go to 0.92
On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Shall we commit the patch at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3857 for 0.92?
I reviewed it and its high-quality, with lots of new tests, and an
attention to self-migration (which it does)
+1
It's a big patch but has seen much more testing than the typical and is of high
quality as you mention. Earlier rather than later I'd say. But then let's let
0.92 bake with it sufficiently.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
This increases the efficiency of a hbase cluster tremendously. +1 for
committing it earlier rather than later.
-dhruba
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
+1
It's a big patch but has seen much more testing than the typical and is of
high quality as you
