Unfortunately, we had to postpone the above event as we could not get
enough traction to get minimum submissions for this event.
You can continue submissions, once we can get enough of them, will organise
this event. Will keep you posted.
---
Mallikarjun
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 7:10 PM
We are organising hbase-meetup in Bangalore, India on 19th Jan 2024. Reach
out to me if you want to attend. I will arrange for entry passes.
CALL FOR SPEAKERS is open
https://sessionize.com/apache-hbase-meetup-bangalore/
Date: 19th Jan 2024
Venue: Flipkart Office, Bangalore.
---
Mallikarjun
It would be good to include these 2 features
Parallel Backups: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26034
RSGroup Support for Backups:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26322
CC: Bryan
---
Mallikarjun
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 7:13 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> HBASE-27109
tps://github.com/flipkart-incubator/hbase-k8s-operator
---
Mallikarjun
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:58 PM Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Heya team,
>
> Over here at $dayjob, we have an increasing reliance on Kubernetes for
> both development and production workloads. Our tools are maturing and
On hbase-backup, we are using in production for more then 1 year. I can
vouch for it to be stable enough to be in a release version so that more
people can use it and polished it further.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022, 11:25 PM Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> My understanding is some folks evaluating and
t-i-37cad340c0fa
Part II -->
https://blog.flipkart.tech/hbase-multi-tenancy-part-ii-79488c19b03d
Talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttGI9Ma7Xos=26s_channel=LifeAtFlipkart
Some of those can be contributed back upstream with modifications. Happy to
hear thoughts.
---
Mallikarjun
Mallikarjun created HBASE-27238:
---
Summary: Backport Backup/Restore to 2.x
Key: HBASE-27238
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27238
Project: HBase
Issue Type: New Feature
Thanks Duo
I have responded to the comments.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022, 6:07 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> I posted some comments on the issues. PTAL.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mallikarjun 于2022年6月17日周五 17:03写道：
>
> > These 2 patches would be a good addition. They still need to be revie
se/pull/4545
---
Mallikarjun
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:38 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> And also bump this one, feel free to reply here if you want to land
> something in the final 3.0.0 release.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrew Purtell 于2022年6月13日周一 02:04写道：
>
> > +1, thanks for your effor
Thanks. Got the point.
---
Mallikarjun
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 7:43 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> We could still add new big features before the last alpha-4 release.
>
> After alpha-4 is out, we will cut a branch-3 and then start to stabilize
> it. For branch-3, we should treat it l
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26322
Patch: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3726
2. Add support to take parallel backups
Details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26034
Patch: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3766
---
Mallikarjun
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:45 AM 张铎
Bump.
---
Mallikarjun
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:46 PM Mallikarjun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a couple of pull requests on Backup/Restore. Appreciate if someone
> could have a look at them.
>
> https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3766
> https://github.com/apache/hbase/pul
Hi,
I have a couple of pull requests on Backup/Restore. Appreciate if someone
could have a look at them.
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3766
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3726
I have put down the context in respective Jiras. Please ask if any clarity
is needed.
---
Mallikarjun
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26346:
---
Summary: Design support for rsgroup data isolation
Key: HBASE-26346
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26346
Project: HBase
Issue Type: New
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26343:
---
Summary: Extend RSGroup to support data isolation to achieve true
multitenancy in Hbase
Key: HBASE-26343
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26343
Project
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26322:
---
Summary: Add rsgroup support for Backup
Key: HBASE-26322
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26322
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26279:
---
Summary: Merger of backup:system table with hbase:meta table
Key: HBASE-26279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26279
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Thanks for answering the queries.
---
Mallikarjun
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:32 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> In hbase, the mvcc write number and wal sequence id are the same
> thing, so when we just want to bump the mvcc number, we will not write
> an actual WAL but the se
Inline Reply
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:06 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> Mallikarjun 于2021年8月18日周三 上午10:19写道：
> >
> > Thanks for the response @Duo
> >
> > Inline reply
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 7:37 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
> wrote:
> >
> > >
n I expect *18775106 *is mandatory to be present?
or there can be gaps.
>
> And on the fix, you can clear the range information for the given
> regions in meta table, and then restart the clusters, I think the
> replication could continue.
>
>
If you mean removing some barriers so tha
and update checkpoints.
---
Mallikarjun
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26203:
---
Summary: Minor cleanups to reduce checkstyle warnings on backup
code
Key: HBASE-26203
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26203
Project: HBase
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26202:
---
Summary: Review deprecated WALProcedureStore usage in Backup
Key: HBASE-26202
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26202
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Thanks Duo.
---
Mallikarjun
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:32 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> Replied on jira. Please give more details about what you are doing in the
> PR...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mallikarjun 于2021年7月25日周日 上午10:48写道：
> >
> > Can someone review this pull r
Can someone review this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/3359
This change changes meta information for backup, if not part of hbase
3.0.0. It might have a lot of additional work to be put into executing the
above mentioned plan.
---
Mallikarjun
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:36 PM
Mallikarjun created HBASE-26034:
---
Summary: Add support to take multiple parallel backup
Key: HBASE-26034
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26034
Project: HBase
Issue Type
For multi tenancy with favoured nodes, timeline looks unreasonable for 3.0.
Can it be part of later 3.x releases? Or should it wait for 4.0?
On Fri, May 21, 2021, 7:30 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> We already have the below big feature/changes for 3.0.0.
>
> Synchronous Replication
> OpenTelemetry
Mallikarjun created HBASE-25891:
---
Summary: Simplify backup table to be able to maintain it
Key: HBASE-25891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25891
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Inline
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 4:51 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> My understanding is that backup work is not ready for inclusion in 2.x.
>
> The talk of removing it from the master branch and proposed adoption of the
> feature through more involvement from some community members were not so
> long
Sure. I have assigned it to myself. Will look into it.
Last time I checked, I did not find any failed tests and it was not hadoop3
---
Mallikarjun
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:34 AM Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Hi Mallikarjun,
>
> I just saw a bunch of backup tests fail on an unrelated PR
Mallikarjun created HBASE-25870:
---
Summary: Search only ancestors instead of entire history instead
for a particular backup
Key: HBASE-25870
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25870
Inline reply
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 1:03 AM Stack wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:30 PM Stack wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:10 AM Mallikarjun
> > wrote:
> >
> >> We use FavoredStochasticBalancer, which by description says the same
> t
ables Hosted: 87
Capacity: 250 TB (100TB used)
---
Mallikarjun
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:15 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> As you all know, we always want to reduce the size of the hbase-server
> module. This time we want to separate the balancer related code to another
> sub modul
Mallikarjun created HBASE-25784:
---
Summary: Support for Parallel Backups enabling multi tenancy
Key: HBASE-25784
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25784
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Slight modification to previous version --> https://ibb.co/Nttx3J1
---
Mallikarjun
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:12 AM Mallikarjun
wrote:
> Inline Reply
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:44 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
>
>> Hi Mallikarjun,
>>
>> Those goals sound worthwhil
Inline Reply
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:44 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi Mallikarjun,
>
> Those goals sound worthwhile.
>
> Do you have a flow chart similar to the one you posted for the current
> system but for the proposed solution?
>
This is what I am thinking -->
Hi Sean,
I will get back with the design changes and the answers to above questions
in a few days time.
---
Mallikarjun
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:44 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi Mallikarjun,
>
> Those goals sound worthwhile.
>
> Do you have a flow chart similar to the
e to concrete conclusion with the reviewer, we
> should open up a PR. Until then this thread is anyways up for discussion.
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 1:58 PM, Mallikarjun
> wrote:
>
> > Hope this link works --> https://ibb.co/hYjRpgP
> >
> > Inline reply
> &
ntain existing design and new design diagrams and
> talk about pros and cons etc once we have things finalized.
>
>
Since I wanted to open this for discussion, did not consider placing it in
*hbase/dev_support/design-docs*.
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 12:13 PM, Mallikarjun
&
Attached as image. Please let me know if it is availabe now.
---
Mallikarjun
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:32 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for the write up. unfortunately, your image for the existing
> design didn't come through. Could you post it to some host and li
: *I can't think of anything better, but I see this can
be a potential problem. Also, one can force full backup if required WAL
files are missing for whatever other reasons not necessarily mentioned
above.
---
Mallikarjun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mallikarjun resolved HBASE-14414.
-
Resolution: Done
> HBase Backup/Restore Phas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mallikarjun resolved HBASE-18892.
-
Resolution: Resolved
> B testing
> ---
>
> Key:
Mallikarjun created HBASE-25501:
---
Summary: Backup not using parameters such as bandwidth, workers,
etc while exporting snapshot
Key: HBASE-25501
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25501
Yea. I have noticed that.
I have some patches ready and have to add unit tests. Will start raising in
a couple of weeks time.
---
Mallikarjun
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 7:48 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> The UTs in the backup module are easy to fail with NPE, I've seen this in
> several pre
Mallikarjun created HBASE-24931:
---
Summary: Candidate Generator helper Action method ignoring 0th
index region
Key: HBASE-24931
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24931
Project: HBase
Mallikarjun created HBASE-24157:
---
Summary: RSGroup Aware Export Snapshot
Key: HBASE-24157
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24157
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
47 matches
Mail list logo
