[RESULT][VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

This VOTE has passed, with 3x binding +1's, a non-binding +1, and a non-binding -0. Thank you to everyone who voted on this release, and who has participated over the last 18-ish months on making branch-1.1 a successful, viable release line. I'll go about the finishing touches. Thanks, Nick On

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

Let's call it a -0. :) On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > Yea, this candidate is fine to promote from my perspective and given the > > other votes cast. Thanks for putting this

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > Yea, this candidate is fine to promote from my perspective and given the > other votes cast. Thanks for putting this together, Nick! > Mike, In that case, would you mind formally upgrading your vote from a -1? I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

Yea, this candidate is fine to promote from my perspective and given the other votes cast. Thanks for putting this together, Nick! On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > At close of the period, this VOTE has received 3x binding +1's, a > non-binding +1, and

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

At close of the period, this VOTE has received 3x binding +1's, a non-binding +1, and a non-binding -1, with no other votes cast. My understanding is that the issues raised by the non-binding -1 are to be taken as guidance for subsequent release lines and do not impact the standing of this

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

+1 - verified tarballs vs public key on people.apache.org. - extracted bin tgz: - inspect structure. look good. - with jdk1.8.0_65: - run LoadTestTool against standalone bin tgz with FAST_DIFF block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good. - poked around webUI. looks

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

+1 Checked sums and signatures: ok Ran unit tests: passed Started standalone cluster and did some basic operations On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > Checked compat report: ok > RAT check passed: ok (7u80) >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

+1 Checked sums and signatures: ok Checked compat report: ok RAT check passed: ok (7u80) Built from source: ok (7u80) Unit tests pass: ok (8u131) 1M row LTT: ok (8u131) On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > No one has voted a binding -1 with actionable

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

No one has voted a binding -1 with actionable changes, so as far as I'm concerned this RC remains valid. If people need more time, we can extend this vote. Thanks, Nick On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Nick: > Originally you set tomorrow as deadline. > > Is

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

Nick: Originally you set tomorrow as deadline. Is there a new RC coming out (w.r.t. Mike's comment) ? Cheers On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Mike: > > > Do you plan to make a human-readable set of release notes in addition to > the list of JIRA

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

Mike: > Do you plan to make a human-readable set of release notes in addition to the list of JIRA issues resolved? Not as such. For all branch-1.1 releases, I've written up a little human-friendly summary in the ANNOUNCE email. Basically, expanding on the list of JIRA tickets I highlight in the

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > I think this can be fixed by using `git archive` to generate the src tar > instead of the src assembly. > > We could update the make_rc.sh script to create the source tarball in this > way. Would you be willing to

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

> I think this can be fixed by using `git archive` to generate the src tar instead of the src assembly. We could update the make_rc.sh script to create the source tarball in this way. Would you be willing to make a patch for that? For release 1.4.0 and up though I propose we remove

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

I think I used some shorthand earlier and ambiguously represented my problem. The issue is that native is missing from the _source_ tarball. I completely understand why it would be missing from the binary tarball, maintaining native binaries is a huge hassle and not in our scope, IMO. However, I

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

I propose to eject hbase-native-client to GitHub on HBASE-19419 On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > hbase-native-client isn't hooked up to the build. We don't have a 'native' > profile like Hadoop that recurses into native component directories and >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

hbase-native-client isn't hooked up to the build. We don't have a 'native' profile like Hadoop that recurses into native component directories and invokes cmake. This won't be available in any RC any RM would generate. Does one even make sense? Binaries built against what? What do you propose? On

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

Thanks for the pointer, Andrew. This worked for me and I was able to start hbase now and can resume testing. I didn't mean to imply that Nick needs to create human release notes, but wanted to know if he had considered it in light of the plan to do so for 1.4.0. I think it's a nice to have, but

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

I think you need to delete $TMPDIR/hbase-mdrob (or whatever is your username) before testing the binaries. Looks like you've been testing a later version and it's left data behind. We have not produced release notes beyond the JIRA generated ones for prior releases. We will soon. This is

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

-1 (non-binding) general: + sign, sums good src: - tar missing hbase-native-client (present in tag) + can build from source (oracle jdk 1.7.0_80) bin: - docs/doap_Hbase.rdf is very out of date (possibly not actually an issue) - unable to launch using bin/hbase-start.sh (both java 7 and 8), got

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

+1 (non binding) Signature, sum: ok Able to start from bin: ok Check basic functionalities: ok LTT with 1M rows: ok Built from source: ok (8u151) Rat check: ok In the logs I saw this line. Source code repository URL looks incorrect. 2017-12-04 10:13:27,028 INFO [main] util.VersionInfo: Source

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

Thanks for putting this together, Nick! Do you plan to make a human-readable set of release notes in addition to the list of JIRA issues resolved? Mike On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.13

[VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available

I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.13 (HBase-1.1.13RC0) is available for download at *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.13RC0/ *. This is to be the final release from branch-1.1. Maven