[RESULT] [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

This RC failed. It had a binding +1 and two -1s inside the voting allotment but discussion says a new RC will get more attention. S On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > I like that plan. I'll try to dig into what a "better" fix might be for > the random ports

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

I like that plan. I'll try to dig into what a "better" fix might be for the random ports stuff tonight. On 4/18/18 5:35 PM, Stack wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Josh Elser wrote: +1 (binding) There are rough edges, of course, but I think this is more than

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > There are rough edges, of course, but I think this is more than enough > quality for a 2.0.0. Putting a line in the sand for 2.0 will help us > continue to make changes that improve the product going

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

; >> This is intentional I think, check HBASE-20385. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Ashish > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Umesh Agashe [mailto:uaga...@cloudera.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 4:01 AM > >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

+1 (binding) There are rough edges, of course, but I think this is more than enough quality for a 2.0.0. Putting a line in the sand for 2.0 will help us continue to make changes that improve the product going forward with more focus and get those changes into the hands of folks downstream.

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

uaga...@cloudera.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 4:01 AM >> To: dev@hbase.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is >> available >> >> -1 non-binding (hbck with write operations disabled not included) >> >> down

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

> > > > > This is intentional I think, check HBASE-20385. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ashish > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Umesh Agashe [mailto:uaga...@cloudera.com] > > > >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

> > > > > bq. signatures & sums- > > NOT > > > OK > > > (md5 checksums missing) > > > > > > This is intentional I think, check HBASE-20385. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ashish >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

> > > Regards, > > Ashish > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Umesh Agashe [mailto:uaga...@cloudera.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 4:01 AM > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] First release candidate

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

iginal Message- > From: Umesh Agashe [mailto:uaga...@cloudera.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 4:01 AM > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is > available > > -1 non-binding (hbck with write oper

RE: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

dev@hbase.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available -1 non-binding (hbck with write operations disabled not included) download src & bin tar ball - OK signatures & sums

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

-1 non-binding (hbck with write operations disabled not included) download src & bin tar ball - OK signatures & sums- NOT OK (md5 checksums missing) build from source (openjdk version "1.8.0_151") - OK rat check

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Was poking around with PE on a few nodes (I forget the exact > circumstances, need to look back at this), and ran into a case where ~35 > regions were left as RIT > > 2018-04-12 22:05:24,431 ERROR >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

Was poking around with PE on a few nodes (I forget the exact circumstances, need to look back at this), and ran into a case where ~35 regions were left as RIT 2018-04-12 22:05:24,431 ERROR [master/ctr-e138-1518143905142-221855-01-02:16000] procedure2.ProcedureExecutor: Corrupt pid=3580,

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Peter Somogyi wrote: > -1 > > Tests under hbase-rsgroup fail in setup phase. It is related to > HBASE-20224, some addendums were not backported to branch-2.0 which causes > the failure. I'm reopening HBASE-20224 and backport 2 missing

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Do we have a list of tests that we know will not pass this release? > > I got those failures so far, but since I want to run multiple runs, I want > to make sure to exclude the un-stable tests. > >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

-1 Tests under hbase-rsgroup fail in setup phase. It is related to HBASE-20224, some addendums were not backported to branch-2.0 which causes the failure. I'm reopening HBASE-20224 and backport 2 missing commits. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org>

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks Sean! 2018-04-13 9:37 GMT-04:00 Sean Busbey : > Hi JMS! > > Current flaky results for branch-2.0, generated today AFAICT: > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase- >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

Hi JMS! Current flaky results for branch-2.0, generated today AFAICT: https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-Find-Flaky-Tests-branch2.0/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ you can look at the "dashboard.html" artifact for a human usable idea of what we think is broken. you can fetch

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

Do we have a list of tests that we know will not pass this release? I got those failures so far, but since I want to run multiple runs, I want to make sure to exclude the un-stable tests. TestAssignmentManagerMetrics.testRITAssignmentManagerMetrics:152 Metrics Should be equal expected:<1> but

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

bq. I'd imagine that if the difference were large, then yes, it should be a blocker -- or we as a community can decide to work on it in a follow-on release making perf a priority (say, 2.1.0). I see, thanks for the clarification boss, makes sense. Best Regards, Yu On 13 April 2018 at 06:02,

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > >> no compat report in the RC directory. does that mean we won't have one >> in the dist area? >> >> >> not a blocker; we've been inconsistent on it in

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Yu Li wrote: > HBASE-20188 is comparing latest 2.0 to our stable pointer 1.2.7, and there > seems to be no conclusion yet, JFYI. While yes I believe more numbers could > give us a broader view :-) > > Yeah, what Yu Li says above. As is, hbase2

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > no compat report in the RC directory. does that mean we won't have one > in the dist area? > > > not a blocker; we've been inconsistent on it in prior releases, but > the trend seemed to be towards including it. > >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

HBASE-20188 is comparing latest 2.0 to our stable pointer 1.2.7, and there seems to be no conclusion yet, JFYI. While yes I believe more numbers could give us a broader view :-) And I'm not sure but is performance regression some kind of a blocker for the release? Thanks. Best Regards, Yu On 11

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

Do we have a ITBLL result and also some performance numbers? I could help getting some performance numbers comparing to the version we use... 2018-04-11 5:50 GMT+08:00 Sean Busbey : > no compat report in the RC directory. does that mean we won't have one > in the dist area? >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

no compat report in the RC directory. does that mean we won't have one in the dist area? not a blocker; we've been inconsistent on it in prior releases, but the trend seemed to be towards including it. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Stack wrote: > The first release

[VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.0.0 (RC0) is available

The first release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for downloading and testing. Artifacts are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0RC0/ Maven artifacts are available in the staging repository at: