With 3 binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote
passes.
Thank you to all who voted on the release candidate!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The first HBase 1.4.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
>
Sounds good. I will sign the tag, no problem.
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 9:56 AM, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
>
> Let's have that discussion about signing artifacts on a different thread,
> including pros and cons. For instance: Is this important to our users? What
> does it help
Let's have that discussion about signing artifacts on a different thread,
including pros and cons. For instance: Is this important to our users? What
does it help or protect against? Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 11:54 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 1:05 AM,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> It is not my practice to sign commits or tags. Is this mandatory? It could
> be. Was there an announcement or discussion? I didn’t see it.
>
Not required by any policy I know of. Enis did it during the 0.99
It is not my practice to sign commits or tags. Is this mandatory? It could be.
Was there an announcement or discussion? I didn’t see it.
Thanks for taking a look!
Please set a fix version of 1.4.4 for the html file issues so they get looked
at next time.
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 10:47 PM,
+1 (binding)
Good:
* checksums and signatures in dist.a.o match up
* source artifact matches with ref 172373d1f0
* compat report looks good
* LICENSE/NOTICE look fine
* rat looks good (couple of things noted below)
Bad but not a blocker:
* tag is not signed, presumably the release tag will be?
+1 non-binding
- Built from source: ok (8u162)
- RAT check: ok (8u162)
- Unit tests pass: ok (8u66)
- Loaded 1M rows with LTT: ok (8u162), all keys verified, latency and logs
looks good
- Shell commands: ok (8u162), ran DDL/flush/compact/split commands,
everything looks good
- Web UI: OK
+1 non-binding
download src & bin tar ball - OK
signatures & sums- OK
build from source (openjdk version "1.8.0_151") - OK
rat check - OK
start local
the only thing I did was
start from bin tarball
ran some shell commands
some java
then took snapshot
dropped the table
restored from snapshot
more shell commands
stopped hbase
built from source and installed
that's pretty much where I saw the error in the UI
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:24 PM,
Thanks for testing the RC!
Can you say more about the circumstances that lead to the
CorruptHFileException?
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Artem Ervits wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> signatures:
> src: OK
> bin: OK
> sha512:
> src: OK
> bin: OK
>
> hbase shell:
+1 (non-binding)
signatures:
src: OK
bin: OK
sha512:
src: OK
bin: OK
hbase shell: OK
logs: OK
Hadoop Pseudo-distrbibuted: 2.7.5
Java 1.8.0_161 1M rows - 1.4.2 client: OK
HBase PE: OK
Source Release:
Build and install: OK
tests: OK
ran tests and still encounterederrors on
+1
- built from source: OK
- unit tests passed: OK
- rat check: OK
- LTT with 1M rows: OK
- ran basic shell commands: OK
- web UI: OK
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> Ran test suite with Java 1.8.0_151 - passed
> Ran RAT check - passed
>
>
+1
Ran test suite with Java 1.8.0_151 - passed
Ran RAT check - passed
LoadTestTool loaded 1M rows
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The first HBase 1.4.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
>
The first HBase 1.4.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.3RC0/ and Maven
artifacts are available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1207/ .
The git tag corresponding
14 matches
Mail list logo