Re: Hive 0.9 release
As per the plan I am going to create a branch now. Please hold off any commits till I send an email for all-clear. Thanks, Ashutosh On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 15:00, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: I think we also need to get the RAT report cleaned up. Apache projects aren't supposed to release while they have files without the Apache header. I've filed HIVE-2930 to fix all of the issues. While working on it, I found that one of the files was added by HIVE-2246. HIVE-2246 was contributed by Sohan Jain, who hasn't filed an ICLA, and doesn't have the jira box checked for contribution. Does someone know him and can ask him to state on the jira that he intended to contribute it? Failing that, I believe he was working at Facebook at the time, so someone else who is still there can upload the patch to the jira? All of this brings up a challenge in that Phabricator and the Apache review tool upload patches to jira without providing a way to check the contribute to Apache box. Without the checkbox we should only commit patches from people who have filed ICLAs. Is there a way to add an option the arc command that will check the box? Even having it *always* check the box is better than having it not check the box. (Although it should warn users that it is doing so.) Thoughts? -- Owen
Re: Hive 0.9 release
All-clear. Trunk is now open for commits. Since HIVE-2929 have resulted in intermittent test failures. (See, HIVE-2937), I branched right before HIVE-2929. Additionally, I merged in HIVE-2764 in 0.9 I also added version 0.10 on jira, so any commits on trunk now must have 0.10 as fix version. Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 17:01, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: As per the plan I am going to create a branch now. Please hold off any commits till I send an email for all-clear. Thanks, Ashutosh On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 15:00, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: I think we also need to get the RAT report cleaned up. Apache projects aren't supposed to release while they have files without the Apache header. I've filed HIVE-2930 to fix all of the issues. While working on it, I found that one of the files was added by HIVE-2246. HIVE-2246 was contributed by Sohan Jain, who hasn't filed an ICLA, and doesn't have the jira box checked for contribution. Does someone know him and can ask him to state on the jira that he intended to contribute it? Failing that, I believe he was working at Facebook at the time, so someone else who is still there can upload the patch to the jira? All of this brings up a challenge in that Phabricator and the Apache review tool upload patches to jira without providing a way to check the contribute to Apache box. Without the checkbox we should only commit patches from people who have filed ICLAs. Is there a way to add an option the arc command that will check the box? Even having it *always* check the box is better than having it not check the box. (Although it should warn users that it is doing so.) Thoughts? -- Owen
Re: Hive 0.9 release
Hi All, Seems like we have an agreement. So, unless someone has other ideas, I will cut the branch for 0.9 on 4/9. Below is the consolidated list which people have requested for 0.9, so as and when these gets checked-in trunk, we will merge it back in 0.9. 2084 2764 538 2646 2777 2585 2883 2926 Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 19:02, Thomas Weise t...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Would be great to get HIVE-2646 included. Thanks, Thomas On 4/2/12 6:59 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9. HIVE-2084 HIVE-2822 HIVE-2764 HIVE-538 I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. Others, please feel free to add this list. Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach c...@cloudera.com wrote: I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release branch. In the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required to get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up wasting time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It would be great if we could avoid all of that this time around. Thanks. Carl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be released and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling for 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for 0.9 later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and subsequent release from it. Thoughts? Thanks, Ashutosh
Re: Hive 0.9 release
Would it be possible/feasible to include 2910? Cheers, Hugo Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 6 apr. 2012 om 21:18 heeft Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org het volgende geschreven: Hi All, Seems like we have an agreement. So, unless someone has other ideas, I will cut the branch for 0.9 on 4/9. Below is the consolidated list which people have requested for 0.9, so as and when these gets checked-in trunk, we will merge it back in 0.9. 2084 2764 538 2646 2777 2585 2883 2926 Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 19:02, Thomas Weise t...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Would be great to get HIVE-2646 included. Thanks, Thomas On 4/2/12 6:59 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9. HIVE-2084 HIVE-2822 HIVE-2764 HIVE-538 I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. Others, please feel free to add this list. Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach c...@cloudera.com wrote: I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release branch. In the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required to get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up wasting time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It would be great if we could avoid all of that this time around. Thanks. Carl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be released and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling for 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for 0.9 later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and subsequent release from it. Thoughts? Thanks, Ashutosh
Re: Hive 0.9 release
I think we also need to get the RAT report cleaned up. Apache projects aren't supposed to release while they have files without the Apache header. I've filed HIVE-2930 to fix all of the issues. While working on it, I found that one of the files was added by HIVE-2246. HIVE-2246 was contributed by Sohan Jain, who hasn't filed an ICLA, and doesn't have the jira box checked for contribution. Does someone know him and can ask him to state on the jira that he intended to contribute it? Failing that, I believe he was working at Facebook at the time, so someone else who is still there can upload the patch to the jira? All of this brings up a challenge in that Phabricator and the Apache review tool upload patches to jira without providing a way to check the contribute to Apache box. Without the checkbox we should only commit patches from people who have filed ICLAs. Is there a way to add an option the arc command that will check the box? Even having it *always* check the box is better than having it not check the box. (Although it should warn users that it is doing so.) Thoughts? -- Owen
Hive 0.9 release
Hi all, Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be released and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling for 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for 0.9 later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and subsequent release from it. Thoughts? Thanks, Ashutosh
Re: Hive 0.9 release
Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9. HIVE-2084 HIVE-2822 HIVE-2764 HIVE-538 I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. Others, please feel free to add this list. Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach c...@cloudera.com wrote: I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release branch. In the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required to get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up wasting time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It would be great if we could avoid all of that this time around. Thanks. Carl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be released and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling for 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for 0.9 later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and subsequent release from it. Thoughts? Thanks, Ashutosh
Re: Hive 0.9 release
Would be great to get HIVE-2646 included. Thanks, Thomas On 4/2/12 6:59 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9. HIVE-2084 HIVE-2822 HIVE-2764 HIVE-538 I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. Others, please feel free to add this list. Thanks, Ashutosh On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach c...@cloudera.com wrote: I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release branch. In the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required to get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up wasting time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It would be great if we could avoid all of that this time around. Thanks. Carl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be released and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling for 0.9 release. If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for 0.9 later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and subsequent release from it. Thoughts? Thanks, Ashutosh
