From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:35 AM
> (This posting maybe a dupe, I hope it's not)
Nope.
Win32 is borked right now... I'm following in rbb's footsteps and in
the process of normalizing where things happen in the mpm, fixing it's
assorte
(This posting maybe a dupe, I hope it's not)
If I start Apache 2 as a service, I get the following lines in my
error.log:
[Wed Feb 06 06:29:27 2002] [crit] (22506)The handle is invalid.: child:
Unable to access scoreboard handle from parent
[Wed Feb 06 06:29:28 2002] [crit] (22505)Access d
I have a question regarding the HTTP protocol and how Internet Explorer
implements it. An application I have written that accepts POSTs fails at
times when the POST comes from Internet Explorer 5 or 5.5, and always works
if the POST comes from Mozilla, Netscape, Opera, or just about anything e
...as of Tuesday, 05-Feb-2002 20:19:24 PST due mostly to bug db problems.
Greg
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I could have sworn that I committed that. Aha! In fact, I posted
> a patch on 7 Jan for this.
applied, but:
configuring package in srclib/apr-util now
[...]
checking for ldap support...checking for gdbm.h... no
checking for db4/db.h... no
checking for db.h... yes
I've been watching the log files and restarting the server for a while
now. Looks like the child may be starting before the parent has
completely opened and written to all of the pipes.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:
Adam Sussman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm seeing a lot of error messages like this in my error log under load with
> lots of children (1300 or so):
>
...
> #0 pthread_sighandler (signo=11, ctx=
> {gs = 0, __gsh = 0, fs = 0, __fsh = 0, es = 43, __esh = 0, ds = 43, __dsh = 0,
>edi = 1
I'm seeing a lot of error messages like this in my error log under load with
lots of children (1300 or so):
[Tue Feb 05 12:52:17 2002] [notice] child pid 32299 exit signal Segmentation fault
(11), possible coredump in /tmp
[Tue Feb 05 12:52:17 2002] [notice] child pid 32298 exit signal Segmenta
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:01:49PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> This is it for me today...
>
> Perhaps the patch will show somebody (Justin?) what happened with
> httpd.core.3.
Yeah, this patch is right. I didn't commit it with the goto because
Greg Ames (he volunteered) is going to need to fix
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:58:35PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > >
> > > When enabled, UseCanonicalName causes the server to
> > > create any server-self-referential URLs using the name
> > > by which it knows itself -- as opposed to what the client
> > > may have
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:01:49PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> This is it for me today...
>
> Perhaps the patch will show somebody (Justin?) what happened with
> httpd.core.3.
Okay. Mucho thanks for looking into it.
I'll try to take it from here. =) -- justin
This is it for me today...
Perhaps the patch will show somebody (Justin?) what happened with
httpd.core.3.
Index: server/protocol.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/protocol.c,v
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -r1.77 protoc
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll try such a request and see if I can recreate it. I wouldn't be
> surprised if the code change I committed earlier will take care of
> it.
Fortunately, I can easily recreate it using the data I sent before.
Unfortunately, the code change I committe
The data read from the network:
read 1:
(gdb) x/255c ((core_net_rec
*)r->input_filters->next->ctx)->client_socket->head->next->data
0x812441c: 71 'G' 69 'E' 84 'T' 32 ' ' 47 '/' 99 'c' 111
'o' 99 'c'
0x8124424: 111 'o' 111 'o' 110 'n' 47 '/' 100 'd' 101 'e' 118
'v' 101 'e'
0x81
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:24:07PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wrowe 02/02/05 15:24:07
>
> Modified:.STATUS
> Log:
> While the tide was turning twords my take... this number of bugs in the
> Winnt mpm mean I can't go against Unix getting a good beta. Now the
>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:32:06PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
> We got a couple more of these today - httpd.core.2 and .4 . .3 is different;
> I'll post the backtrace in a separate thread.
Core .3 looks semi-bogus. (I seem to have lost where you posted the
backtrace for it.)
It looks like r has b
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:56:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > trawick 02/02/05 14:56:44
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >server core.c
> > Log:
> > In core_input_filter, check for an empty brigade after
Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The client connected and wrote a header which indicated that a body
> > was forthcoming but we hit EOF before reading any body bytes. Cool,
> > huh?
>
> We got a couple more of these today - httpd.core.2 and .4 . .3 is different;
> I'll post the backtr
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:56:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> trawick 02/02/05 14:56:44
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>server core.c
> Log:
> In core_input_filter, check for an empty brigade after
> APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE(). Otherwise, we can get segfaults
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:14:21PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
> Looking in mod_auth_dbm.c, apparently AP_AUTH_DBM_USE_APR isn't defined because
> the log message doesn't have the "(type %s)", so we are doing dbm_open() and
> that fails. Should AP_AUTH_DBM_USE_APR be defined when mod_auth_dbm is comp
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> * On 2002-02-05 at 16:42,
> Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
> >
> > I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release.
>
> What's the reason for *not* waiting? In what way did 1.3.23 regress?
> (I.e., what d
Thanks for the explanation. The patch to eliminate install_transport_filters gets a +1
from me.
Bill
>
> > From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:44 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove the insert_transport_filters hook
> >
>
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:47 PM
> I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release. Allan Edwards
>has
> been able to reproduce the problem and it is looking more and more like an XP bug.
>We
> send a buffer full of "A"'s
I'm going to bounce the server on daedalus back to 2.0.29 later tonight. We
need fixes for the input side problems and we need a working bug db.
This one could have the same underlying cause as the other dumps, but it's hard
to say at this point. Maybe gdb is confused by recursive ap_rgetline c
> > From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > > Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't we fix the canonicalisation then? If you have
> > > > configured your server so that it can't be reached through
> > > > the canoni
> From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Jsohua.
>
And yes, I am completely incapable of spelling my own name. That's what 10
years of "higher education" will do for you.
J.
At 3:17 PM -0600 2/5/02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:09 PM
>
>
>> I'm still gunning to t/r and release 1.3.24 within the week. If this
>> creates heartburn for anyone, speak up now.
>
>Jim,
>
> I'm suspicious that what
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we fix the canonicalisation then? If you have
> > > configured your server so that it can't be reached through
> > > the canonical name, then yo
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove the insert_transport_filters hook
>
> > > This approach has an aesthetic problem that annoys me. If
mod_yadda
> > wants
> > > to insert its
> > > own
* On 2002-02-05 at 16:42,
Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release.
What's the reason for *not* waiting? In what way did 1.3.23 regress?
(I.e., what deadly bug is in 1.3.23 that wasn't in 1.3.22?)
I am really against letting this XP issue hold up the 1.3.24 release. Allan Edwards
has
been able to reproduce the problem and it is looking more and more like an XP bug. We
send a buffer full of "A"'s on the send and the network gets an equal number of trashed
bytes.
In the unlikely case it t
> > This approach has an aesthetic problem that annoys me. If mod_yadda
> wants
> > to insert its
> > own replacement of CORE_IN and CORE_OUT, how does it reliable do so
> and
> > ensure:
> >
> > 1. CORE_IN and CORE_OUT are not also installed (their presence in the
> > filter chain when
> > they a
Graham Leggett wrote:
> This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>
> --ms4949D2B6D144F9280EAD0AAA
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Ian Holsman wrote:
>
>
>>This directive is >only< on the incoming request, If I'm c
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > > Here is some basic information:
> >
> > Which you can get to on daedalus via
> >
> > gdb /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd /usr/local/apache/corefiles/httpd.core.1
>
> The following script shows a way to recreate:
>
> The client connected and wrote a header which indicat
> -Original Message-
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Any vetos on releasing 1.3.24...
>
> From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 20
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:09 PM
> I'm still gunning to t/r and release 1.3.24 within the week. If this
> creates heartburn for anyone, speak up now.
Jim,
I'm suspicious that whatever bug we hit on 2.0 with XP services is
the same bug as th
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove the insert_transport_filters hook
>
> This approach has an aesthetic problem that annoys me. If mod_yad
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > stat("/home/apmail/bugdbaccounts.db",0xbfbff2f8) ERR#2 'No such file or
> > > > directory'
> > > > open("/home/apmail/bugdbaccounts.db",0,0664) ERR#2 'No such file or
> > > > directory'
> >
> > OK, I wonder if someth
I'm still gunning to t/r and release 1.3.24 within the week. If this
creates heartburn for anyone, speak up now.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will tra
> -Original Message-
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: UseCanonicalName considered harmful
>
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't we fix the canonicalisation then? If you have
> > c
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we fix the canonicalisation then? If you have
> configured your server so that it can't be reached through
> the canonical name, then you have an incorrect config.
ServerName foo
Listen 3
You're saying that this is incorrect and invalid?
--
This approach has an aesthetic problem that annoys me. If mod_yadda wants to insert its
own replacement of CORE_IN and CORE_OUT, how does it reliable do so and ensure:
1. CORE_IN and CORE_OUT are not also installed (their presence in the filter chain when
they are not used is not right IMHO).
2.
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> > When enabled, UseCanonicalName causes the server to
> > create any server-self-referential URLs using the name
> > by which it knows itself -- as opposed to what the client
> > may have called it. In many cases this is entirely
> > reasonable and good -- bu
(I'm hitting send too soon..)
As an example, consider a 'ServerName "MyServer" running on
localhost, and requesting the directory object
http://localhost:3/foo
mod_dir will cause a redirect in order to pick up '/foo/'
instead, but if UseCanonicalName is set to 'On', the
redirect will actual
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> When enabled, UseCanonicalName causes the server to
> create any server-self-referential URLs using the name
> by which it knows itself -- as opposed to what the client
> may have called it. In many cases this is entirely
> reasonable and good -- but it complete
Ian Holsman wrote:
> This directive is >only< on the incoming request, If I'm caching results
> of a expensive call to a backend server, why should some piddly client
> tell me to re-get the info, forcing a subsecond response to become a 10
> second one ?
Because the HTTP protocol says it can.
I propose that an additional keyword be added to the
UseCanonicalName directive.. something like 'HostOnly'.
When enabled, UseCanonicalName causes the server to
create any server-self-referential URLs using the name
by which it knows itself -- as opposed to what the client
may have called it. In
This patch removes the insert_transport_filters hook, and replaces it
with the pre_connection hook. The were in the same place, with the only
difference being the arguments and one was RUN_FIRST while the other was
RUN_ALL. I solved the first problem by changing the arguments of the
pre_connect
Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> > >>[Tue Feb 05 02:35:30 2002] [error] [client 61.11.11.198] (2)No such file or
> > >>directory: could not open dbm auth file: /home/apmail/bugdbaccounts, referer:
> > >>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
>
> > > time to dive into the cod
Ian Holsman wrote:
> >>[Tue Feb 05 02:35:30 2002] [error] [client 61.11.11.198] (2)No such file or
> >>directory: could not open dbm auth file: /home/apmail/bugdbaccounts, referer:
> >>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
> > time to dive into the code and see where the error message comes from, and wha
From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:45 PM
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> >>> Was this a soft restart apache -k restart or a hard restart?
> >>>
> >>I just clicked on the restart computer option on the shutdown menu. I
> >>did not gracefully stop the
Greg Ames wrote:
> The "could not open" message is probably an important clue:
>
> [Tue Feb 05 02:35:30 2002] [error] [client 61.11.11.198] (2)No such file or
> directory: could not open dbm auth file: /home/apmail/bugdbaccounts, referer:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
> I'll fire it up on port
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:09 PM
>
>
>>>Dwayne...
>>>
>>> what CPU is your box on [staring on hunches here] ... speed?
>>>
>>It's a laptop with an 850 Mhz Pentium. Actual id is
>>x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 6 Gen
From: "Paul J. Reder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:20 PM
> When I talk about dereferencing into the pointer I am talking about
> within the apr_rmm_malloc and apr_rmm_free functions, not inside
> mod_auth_digest. I realize that apr_rmm_malloc returns offsets into
> the
From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:09 PM
> >Dwayne...
> >
> > what CPU is your box on [staring on hunches here] ... speed?
> >
> It's a laptop with an 850 Mhz Pentium. Actual id is
> x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 6 GenuineIntel
>
> More info than you
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> Woops. I just realized the AuthDBMType directive is already there, so my
> diagnosis must be wrong. Oh well, any ideas?
well,
AuthDBMUserFile /home/apmail/bugdbaccounts
AuthDBMType DB
was just a guess.
my ideas:
* find a Smart Person (certainly not me) who can
When I talk about dereferencing into the pointer I am talking about
within the apr_rmm_malloc and apr_rmm_free functions, not inside
mod_auth_digest. I realize that apr_rmm_malloc returns offsets into
the var, but the var is inited to NULL. Offsetting into there seems,
um, problematic. :)
I think
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:40 PM
>
>
>>This morning, for the first time on my system, Apache 2.0.(31) started
>>as a service automatically. I was so thrilled that I restarted the
>>computer to see it again. And
From: "Dwayne Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:40 PM
> This morning, for the first time on my system, Apache 2.0.(31) started
> as a service automatically. I was so thrilled that I restarted the
> computer to see it again. And it worked.
:)
> Then later, I lo
jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have some problems with the httpd-2.0 (from CVS).
> Whe compiled with Sun compiler it hangs at startup:
> +++
> > $c
(some internal library calls omitted)
> l
This morning, for the first time on my system, Apache 2.0.(31) started
as a service automatically. I was so thrilled that I restarted the
computer to see it again. And it worked.
Then later, I lost my DHCP lease, and had to reboot again. This time,
the following text was in my error.log. I
Ryan Bloom wrote:
> Why do your web servers rely on DNS at all? If your config file doesn't
> specify HostNameLookup on, and you always use dotted quad notation, the
> server shouldn't ever use the DNS server. If it does, I would consider
> that a showstopper.
>
we don't do hostname lookup on o
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> Why do your web servers rely on DNS at all?
Maybe outbound connexions to roundrobin DNS sites? Proxypass,
perhaps? I think it's reasonable to assume there's a reason
for them doing it that way other than ignorance.. :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini
Why do your web servers rely on DNS at all? If your config file doesn't
specify HostNameLookup on, and you always use dotted quad notation, the
server shouldn't ever use the DNS server. If it does, I would consider
that a showstopper.
Ryan
--
Ryan Bl
Hi,
I have some problems with the httpd-2.0 (from CVS).
Whe compiled with Sun compiler it hangs at startup:
+++
> $c
libc.so.1`_lwp_sema_wait+8(8d7f0, ff19e000, 0, 8d738, 2501c, 0)
libthread.so.1`_swtch+0
we got bit by this on one of our high-load development servers.
the DNS server hung, and all the webserver ground to a halt.
in 1.3 we had a custom module which tweaked the resolver's
retransmission time interval & #times to retransmit options
(in the global structure _res on most unixes)
now t
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stupid question time: how does windows hand of something to the right server?
> I thought that the port/ip combination was supposed to be unique.
It doesn't. Basically, the second server can bind to the port without an
error, but it won't get
Graham Leggett wrote:
> This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>
> --msE98EC4A31A500D9720859F64
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> add another option.. CacheIgnoreCacheControl. this
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> Reverted.
Ta. 401 and 500 are (or can be) slightly special cases. 401
because we're not sure the user can access the resource and
shouldn't let him know it even exists without that surety. And
500 because we're not sure what went wrong, and if the
config error were fi
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > List files that would result in HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED in addition to
> > successes and redirections, since there's a chance the client will
> > actually have the proper authorization to retrieve them.
>
> -1 (y
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> Forewarned that
>
> > o abc
> > o Abc
> > o Bcd
> > o bcd
> > o xyz
> > o Xyz
>
> is equally possible with this patch, it doesn't sort by case at all.
Fixed in the version of the patch I'll be committing. If
strcasecmp() returns equality, pass on to strcmp()
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Here is some basic information:
>
> Which you can get to on daedalus via
>
> gdb /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd /usr/local/apache/corefiles/httpd.core.1
The following script shows a way to recreate:
The cl
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> If this is supported, should we document it in the interest
> of not creating "hidden features"?
Yep, it's on my list..
> Jsohua.
Who are you, and what have you done with Joshua? :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, dev
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> coar02/02/05 07:21:56
>
> Modified:src/modules/standard mod_alias.c
> Log:
> Demote the 'turned /foo into http://host/foo' message from
> WARNING to DEBUG; it's a supported operation, so no need to
> fill
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > No, because I've vetoed the 'fix' as a security violation.
> > Sorry..
>
> So you say it's proper not to display a directory name if it requires
> auth?
>
Yes
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMA
> From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > Just a heads up: There are multiple bug reports that claim that the
> new
> > mod_proxy is messing up when multiple set-cookie headers are present,
> which
> > prevents some sites like hotmail from working correctly.
* On 2002-02-05 at 09:06,
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > No, because I've vetoed the 'fix' as a security violation.
> > Sorry..
>
> So you say it's proper not to display a directory name if it requires
Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just a heads up: There are multiple bug reports that claim that the new
> mod_proxy is messing up when multiple set-cookie headers are present, which
> prevents some sites like hotmail from working correctly. Anyone who is
> interested should check the bug database.
Is th
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> > agreed, but auth required is not 500 ;)
>
> But you said what you were getting was a 500, not a 401:
>
> > When I've tried to enter the new directory manually
> > http://apache.org/~stas/modperl-site/ I've got 500 err
I basically copied the way the FreeBSD filters are used. This does a
setsockopt to turn on TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT on 2.4 linux kernels. In Order for
everything to compile correctly, use "-DTCP_DEFER_ACCEPT" in your CFLAGS.
--
Brian Akins
Systems Engineer III
CNN Internet Technologies
diff -pru
Hi,
Stupid question time: how does windows hand of something to the right server?
I thought that the port/ip combination was supposed to be unique.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > rbb 02/02/04 22:16:04
> >
> > Modified:.STATUS
> >server listen.c
> >
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is some basic information:
Which you can get to on daedalus via
gdb /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd /usr/local/apache/corefiles/httpd.core.1
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconVal
I was attempting to put together a post like this yesterday when my
cable modem went out, and fortunately the cable didn't get restored at
the promised time so I got a good night's sleep.
Here is some basic information:
Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done.
#0 0x80767be in core_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> rbb 02/02/04 22:16:04
>
> Modified:.STATUS
>server listen.c
> Log:
> This change keeps the server from allowing multiple instances to bind to
> the same port. Previously, this was necessary, because the Windows MPM
> wa
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> Status update:
>
> Cliff has committed the fix,
> I've have committed the new test.
>
> So I guess this issue is closed now.
No, because I've vetoed the 'fix' as a security violation.
Sorry..
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Aut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> List files that would result in HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED in addition to
> successes and redirections, since there's a chance the client will
> actually have the proper authorization to retrieve them.
-1 (yes, a veto). Standard security practice: you don't
expose even
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> agreed, but auth required is not 500 ;)
But you said what you were getting was a 500, not a 401:
> When I've tried to enter the new directory manually
> http://apache.org/~stas/modperl-site/ I've got 500 error.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> add another option.. CacheIgnoreCacheControl. this ignores a 'incoming request's
> attempts to get a fresh copy. Mainly I see this as being usefull in r-proxy's
Ignoring the cache control headers effectively breaks the HTTP protocol
- is there a specific applicatio
Status update:
Cliff has committed the fix,
I've have committed the new test.
So I guess this issue is closed now.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:18 PM
> >
> >
> >
>
On 5 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Index: listen.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/listen.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.69
> retrieving revision 1.70
> diff -u -r1.69 -r1.70
> --- listen.c4 Feb
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:18 PM
>
>
>
I think it's a bug. The sub-directory can be password-protected. Does it
mean that mod_autoindex won't display it, since it'll fail to run the
sub-request?
91 matches
Mail list logo
