DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A few comments:
1. If you have an older version of flex than that expected, it gives
message:
checking flex version... configure: WARNING: Flex version 2.5.31 or
greater is required. The one you have seems to be 2.5.4. Use
--with-flex to specify another.
There is nothing in the README
Hello,
I ran into a problem with the loader on MacOSX.
MaxOSX 1.4.2
python 2.4.1
apache 2.0.54
The loader seems to not like the -undefined suppress arguments in the
final load.
I modified dist/setup.py by removing the two -undefined suppress and ran
configure and make again and the new
+1 on Win32 with Python 2.4. Here is how I tested it :
1) Switched to the 3.2.0-BETA tag
2) Update
3) cd dist build_installer.bat
4) Got this installer, that you can also download :
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/mod_python-3.2.0-BETA.win32-py2.4.exe
5) Ran the installer,
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
OK, here is the flex scoop - as the the docs point out, anything before
2.5.31 is not reentrant and I think even uses a slightly different
interface so older flex won't even process the psp_parser.l file correctly.
Looking at Fedora Core 4, it still has
On 19/08/2005, at 2:59 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Ron Reisor wrote:
Hello,
I ran into a problem with the loader on MacOSX.
MaxOSX 1.4.2
python 2.4.1
apache 2.0.54
The loader seems to not like the -undefined suppress arguments in
the final load.
I modified dist/setup.py by removing the two
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:17:41PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Content definitely should not be served from the cache after it has
expired imo. However I think an approach like;
if((now + interval) expired) {
if(!stat(tmpfile)) {
update_cache_from_backend();
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:43:01PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
Sounds great. Can you exclude the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Would be interesting to profile that to determine how expensive those
stats could be...
Should be much less expensive than the case now -- the thundering herd
when an object expires. Of course, the behavior would be configurable.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sort of testing did you do in those few hours?
That's why I posted it, to get some more input.
If I could play devil's advocate for a moment... my concern would be that
you haven't considered certain scenarios that won't work with this patch.
Most of the
Here's a new patch that changes the option name to CacheVaryOverride and
does some of the stuff Justin recommened.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
diff -ru httpd-trunk.orig/modules/cache/cache_storage.c
httpd-trunk.new/modules/cache/cache_storage.c
---
This one's kinda ugly.
Rather than rely on apr_file_gets, this stores the total length of the
tables, then the serialized table in store_table. In read_table, it
reads this length, allocs that amount, and reads the headers into the
buffer. Then it just uses memchr to parse it into a table.
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
A few comments:
1. If you have an older version of flex than that expected, it gives
message:
checking flex version... configure: WARNING: Flex version 2.5.31 or
greater is required. The one you have seems to be 2.5.4. Use
--with-flex to specify another.
There is
Some more low hanging fruit.
This moves varray into disk_cache_object_t and only writes out/reads in
the request headers if the response actually varied.
An easy 4-7% performance boost in my tests for responses with no vary.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
OK, here is the flex scoop - as the the docs point out, anything before
2.5.31 is not reentrant and I think even uses a slightly different
interface so older flex won't even process the psp_parser.l file
correctly.
Looking at Fedora Core 4, it still has flex 2.5.4a. (Note that 2.5.31
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:22:13AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Thanks to all who reminded me what a dumb-a## I am this morning...
I forgot the patch. Here it is.
Cool.
diff -ru httpd-trunk.orig/modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c
httpd-trunk.new2/modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c
---
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
I can understand why this is faster, I'm guessing that you've enough RAM
that you're retrieving files from the vmcache and that the higher-layer
buffering is just overhead. This is probably going to be the majority
case, but would do with testing.
Not to heap more
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:43:41AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
I can understand why this is faster, I'm guessing that you've enough RAM
that you're retrieving files from the vmcache and that the higher-layer
buffering is just overhead. This is probably going to be the majority
case, but would do
Hi all,
as we discussed more than once here on the list the latest sources require that
one has LDAP 3.0 support in the platform SDK. I was not able to get that ldap
3.0 piece to fit into the platform sdk for MSVC6, so I'm for longer no more
able to build 2.1 or later self.
So I asked another
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Thinking about it, everything is going into memory anyway, so why not
just stat() the file and read it all in in one go?
Yes! Brilliant. We need all that data anyway.
so:
open file.
length = get_info
read_full(file, length).
manipulate pointers for table
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:11:56PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Yep, but there are definite speed-up's to be had. I'm going to
canibalise your patch and try some of the above anyway.
Cool. I'd be willing to help.
I'll be putting on-line all of my TODO's and patches-in-progress
shortly, I have
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Do you mean as in using MAP_SHARED? I could see that being a
race-condition nightmare. For example cache_info_t's pointers to the
header tables would have to be local to the process, but the memory for
the cache_info_t itself wouldn't be. Definitely to be avoided!
On 8/18/05, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't mess with the EBCDIC stuff, so alot of the patch is just where
I commented all that out.
The EBCDIC stuff came here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=105236view=rev
Apparently Justin needed logic similar to
--On August 18, 2005 3:59:05 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thinking about it, everything is going into memory anyway, so why not
just stat() the file and read it all in in one go?
We know it's never going to be that big anyway. This completely
minimises the number of
Ron Reisor wrote:
Hello,
I ran into a problem with the loader on MacOSX.
MaxOSX 1.4.2
python 2.4.1
apache 2.0.54
The loader seems to not like the -undefined suppress arguments in the
final load.
I modified dist/setup.py by removing the two -undefined suppress and
ran configure and make
--On August 18, 2005 9:24:57 AM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:17:41PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Content definitely should not be served from the cache after it has
expired imo. However I think an approach like;
if((now + interval)
--On August 18, 2005 9:55:57 AM -0400 Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why do we pass request_rec to recall_headers, but not to recall_body. We
also always pass r-pool. How horrible would it be if the prototype was
changed to:
apr_status_t (*recall_body) (cache_handle_t *h, request_rec
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Okay. I see what you mean now.
If the interval is configurable via a directive, then yes that makes sense.
This could be done independently of deterministic tempfiles.
It could, though it would require using a seperate
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
But, that's why we do the buffered read. It almost always ends up being
one read() for me as the header file is always less than 4k.
True.
I don't believe we should necessarily optimize based on the results of
one platform when we know its going to kill us
--On August 18, 2005 1:34:56 PM -0400 Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The optimizations that Colm is talking about should be helpful everywhere.
Also, that's why we test to make sure it does kill us. Also, I don't think
we know it will kill us.
None of the code in mod_disk_cache used
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd be fine with it matching store_body's prototype. (Which is what you
have.) -- justin
Here's a patch that does this.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
diff -ru httpd-trunk.orig/modules/cache/mod_cache.c
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
None of the code in mod_disk_cache used buffering before I turned it
on. It gave significant speedups in my performance tests by reducing
the syscall overhead. I also had identified and fixed some bugs in
apr's buffering code to go along with these speedups that
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:43:45AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
None of the code in mod_disk_cache used buffering before I turned it on.
It gave significant speedups in my performance tests by reducing the
syscall overhead. I also had identified and fixed some bugs in apr's
buffering
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
The optimisations wouldn't be removing buffering, they'd be using a
different kind of buffering :-) If MMap is not available/enabled we can
fail back to a buffered APR read.
So it's evolved even further...
I would be interested to see in a variety of cases which one
Hi there,
I've spent the last few days trying to get an input filter to work in
mod_python, in the context of requests that are being reverse proxied to
an app-server by mod_proxy. I've also tried mod_rewrite.
The input filter works fine if mod_proxy or mod_rewrite are *not* in
play and
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:39:18PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Dead process is solveable with IPC, the existing locking schemes should
be enough for this. The hard problem I think is when a backend has
stalled. Can't think of an easy fix for that case.
When you stat the temp file, if its
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
So mtime not being recent is no-indication of death, it could easily be
a trickling download.
True. But, if the files mtime has not changed in 120 seconds (for
example) the download is probably hung?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:00:52PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
So mtime not being recent is no-indication of death, it could easily be
a trickling download.
True. But, if the files mtime has not changed in 120 seconds (for
example) the download is probably hung?
We have servers that listen on a ports other than 80 which our load
balancers communicate with. The client hits port 80 on the load
balancer. I hacked up a quick module to try to emulate the old Port
config directive so that redirects go to the canonical port.
It does this by changing
Brian,
On Aug 18, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Brian Akins wrote:
We have servers that listen on a ports other than 80 which our load
balancers communicate with. The client hits port 80 on the load
balancer. I hacked up a quick module to try to emulate the old
Port config directive so that
Sander Temme wrote:
Do you do more/different things?
This is what I do in translate_name:
if((conf = ap_get_module_config(r-server-module_config,
port_module)) != NULL) {
if(conf-port != NOCONFIG) {
/*looking at server/core.c, ap_get_server_port This looks
to be the
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-08-11 05:57:40 -0400 (Thu, 11 Aug 2005) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-06-30 16:42:43 -0400 (Thu, 30 Jun 2005) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
flood STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Release:
1.0: Released July 23, 2002
milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002
ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the
Hmm, it seems if useCanonicalName is off and you use Servername like this:
ServerName www.domain.com:80
That ap_get_servername will use that port unless the client used a port
in the Host: header.
My testing seems to confirm this. Is this correct?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
* mod_cache: Resolve issue of how to cache page fragements (or perhaps
-if- we want to cache page fragements). Today, mod_cache/mod_mem_cache
will cache #include 'virtual' requests (but not #include 'file'
requests). This was accomplished by
-1.
If what the PR you fixed wanted to avoid mod_cgi, or the core
handler dealing with the request, then the correct answer
was to have those modules reject this request. Now I expect
you've just hijacked the request away from tomcat via mod_jk
among other methods for a module to substitute
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
-1.
If what the PR you fixed wanted to avoid mod_cgi, or the core
handler dealing with the request, then the correct answer
was to have those modules reject this request. Now I expect
you've just hijacked the request away from tomcat via mod_jk
among other
The spec for If-{None-}Match and If-{Un}Modified-Since is driving
me batty.
The biggest item has to do with having to know the response code
for the request without processing the request. Specifically, 14.24
(If-Match) and the others have a requirement like:
If the request
Here is my current plan for introducing the RBL support in mod_smtpd, using
the existing mod_dnsbl_lookup which I posted earlier. This way of
accomplishing the RBL support should not require any code modification to
mod_smtpd itself. Nick and Rian, let me know if I should be going about
this a
On Aug 18, 2005, at 7:11 PM, Jem Berkes wrote:
Here is my current plan for introducing the RBL support in
mod_smtpd, using
the existing mod_dnsbl_lookup which I posted earlier. This way of
accomplishing the RBL support should not require any code
modification to
mod_smtpd itself. Nick and
At 03:36 AM 8/18/2005, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:43:01PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
smtpd_run_connect (might deny service to connecting IP, per
request_rec)
smtpd_run_mail (might deny service to this envelope domain, per loc)
+1
...
Don't do this just yet, mod_smtpd is changing completely! completely =
structures/io. I should commit my changes very soon so you can
At 12:43 AM 8/18/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
Note you can't tag the recent commit to mod_dir, there
is a veto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'ers...
As Paul mentions below, on Friday (probably 1 a.m. ;-) he will
tag 2.1.7. This is just a reminder to our most excellent doco
team that, once ack'ed - this becomes 2.1 beta, and then...
(drum roll please...) 2.2 GA(!)
So if you had changes to catch up with 2.1 that
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:43 AM 8/18/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
Note you can't tag the recent
58 matches
Mail list logo
