Hi,
I' ve search for all the archieve but i couln't find the answer, may be i
missed up, don't know.
I'm trying to write an apache module and i want to inject some html code
into resonses.
It might be in body, header or footer. The only thing that i want to
implemet is inserting an url or a text
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:47:37PM +0200, O??uzhan TOPG?L wrote:
Hi,
I' ve search for all the archieve but i couln't find the answer, may be i
missed up, don't know.
I'm trying to write an apache module and i want to inject some html code
into resonses.
It might be in body, header or footer.
What's your thinking on how you are going to parse the HTML to inject the
code? Do you need to parse arbitrary HTML from any website or is this
filter targeted at a particular site whose HTML is tailored for this
purpose?
-Josh
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:15 PM, r...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun,
No, there is no particular web site whoose HTML is tailored for this
purpose. At first i think this is not that much hard to add just a url or
just a text at the end of the page as a footer. But now, i think this is
not that much easy to apply.
regards
Oguzhan
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:44 AM,
purpose. At first i think this is not that much hard to add just a
url or just a text at the end of the page as a footer. But now, i
think this is not that much easy to apply.
Have a look at mod_footer. However you're right, it's not as easy as
one might hope.
Well, why don't you just
On Saturday 03 December 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
These are
On 4 Dec 2011, at 04:16, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
What seems to have not made it in there .. I am not against adding them to
mod_ssl, since I see no other use for these specific modules.
mod_authn_socache is probably the first other module to benefit from separating
out
this functionality
On Saturday 03 December 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
On 2 Dec 2011, at 23:19, s...@apache.org wrote:
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/http_log.h
[...]
+ * 20111202.1 (2.5.0-dev) add APLOGNO()
2.4 or 2.5?
Changed it to 2.4. I
On 12/4/2011 1:02 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 03 December 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
-
On 04 Dec 2011, at 6:16 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
What seems to have not made it in there .. I am not against adding them to
mod_ssl, since I see no other use for these specific modules.
I see tonnes of uses for these modules. We already have mod_authn_socache in
v2.4 right now, and
On 04 Dec 2011, at 11:02 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Isn't the answer to this that all consumers of slotmem and socache
should simply point to the mod_slotmem_*/mod_socache_* modules in the
error message if the configured provider is not found? Then the user
would immediately know that
On 29.11.2011 13:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
mod_ssl
mod_session
mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links to openssl
(or any other library), it's all abstracted away.
On 04 Dec 2011, at 12:28 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It isn't. Someone trimming their LoadModule lines will undoubtedly
hit the wall trying to figure out why they couldn't just switch from
memcache or dbm back to shmcb. Someone else will break there server
simply removing unfamiliar
On 30.11.2011 01:02, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
While merging I am getting a lot of stray svn:mergeinfo changes on arbitrary
files, for example:
M modules/core/mod_watchdog.c
M modules/core/mod_so.c
M modules/core/Makefile.in
M modules/core/config.m4
M
On 04.12.2011 14:15, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 29.11.2011 13:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
mod_ssl
mod_session
mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links
to openssl (or any
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
@@ -551,7 +546,7 @@ static int scgi_handler(request_rec *r,
cleanup:
if (backend) {
backend-close = 1; /* always close the socket */
-ap_proxy_release_connection(PROXY_FUNCTION, backend, r-server);
+
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 03 Dec 2011, at 2:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On the subject of logs-relative vs absolute, / should prevail, the
colon prefix is unacceptable.
On the subject of anonymous, Anonymous mappings are mappings of that area
of the
On Dec 2, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
There seems to be a lot of renewed effort in getting 2.4/trunk is a
really releasable state, which is all Goodness. Ideally, I'd like
to release 2.4.0 before the end of the year, but starting off
2012 with a new
On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I was reading http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_slotmem_shm.html
and am rather fluxored that the authors apparently don't know the definition
of the word anonymous shared memory. And there is a brand new syntax if
users want
- Original Message -
On Dec 2, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
There seems to be a lot of renewed effort in getting 2.4/trunk is a
really releasable state, which is all Goodness. Ideally, I'd like
to release 2.4.0 before the end of
On 04.12.2011 15:38, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
@@ -551,7 +546,7 @@ static int scgi_handler(request_rec *r,
cleanup:
if (backend) {
backend-close = 1; /* always close the socket */
-
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There seems to be a lot of renewed effort in getting 2.4/trunk is a
really releasable state, which is all Goodness. Ideally, I'd like
to release 2.4.0 before the end of the year, but starting off
2012 with a new httpd release also makes some sense as
On 04 Dec 2011, at 5:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As you likely know, the origins of slotmem grew out of the
httpd-proxy-scoreboard
branch (~5.5 years ago) and I assume jfclere had reasons for his choice
for how to setup naming of paths, etc... But that is water under the
bridge; if we wish
On 04 Dec 2011, at 5:41 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I was kind of hoping for GA before Christmas...
+1.
We could also consider putting the focus more on polishing by making API
changes and large refactorings review-then-commit. Probably with the
exception of the proxy/slotmem plans that
On 04 Dec 2011, at 3:27 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
We have http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/socache.html
In the absence of actual module pages, a solution would be to create the
URLs for them, with redirection to that page. Add appropriate links and
they're well-documented for someone reading
mod_slotmem_plain plain
mod_slotmem_shm shared !
mod_socache_dbm dbm
mod_socache_dc dc
mod_socache_memcachemc !
mod_socache_shmcb shmcb
Should we align the provider names with the module names? E.g. change
shared to shm and mc to memcache?
On 04 Dec 2011, at 6:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
mod_slotmem_plain plain
mod_slotmem_shm shared!
mod_socache_dbm dbm
mod_socache_dcdc
mod_socache_memcache mc!
mod_socache_shmcb shmcb
Should we align the provider
Picking up this old discussion:
On 03.07.2011 19:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/1/2011 12:26 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same chunk of Win32 specific debugging code causing this
module to
crash yet again.
Gregg: Can
On 12/03/2011 08:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- modules docs
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_watchdog
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
- mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
I vote these off the Windows boat, mod_watchdog crashes
On Dec 4, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There seems to be a lot of renewed effort in getting 2.4/trunk is a
really releasable state, which is all Goodness. Ideally, I'd like
to release 2.4.0 before the end of the year, but starting off
I'm +1 for committing as is and letting people test/patch
from there and then backporting ;)
On Dec 4, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 5:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As you likely know, the origins of slotmem grew out of the
httpd-proxy-scoreboard
branch (~5.5
On Dec 4, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 5:41 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I was kind of hoping for GA before Christmas...
+1.
We could also consider putting the focus more on polishing by making API
changes and large refactorings review-then-commit.
On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
mod_slotmem_plain plain
mod_slotmem_shm shared!
mod_socache_dbm dbm
mod_socache_dcdc
mod_socache_memcache mc!
mod_socache_shmcb shmcb
Should we align the
On 12/04/2011 06:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's shoot for an RC1 this week. I'll RM.
Do we have bundled apr/apr-util versions defined?
Regards
--
^TM
On 04 Dec 2011, at 8:03 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Let's shoot for an RC1 this week. I'll RM.
Do we have bundled apr/apr-util versions defined?
Ideally we want apr-util v1.4.0, which is yet to be released. I've proposed to
RM a release of apr-util this weekend or next week to the APR project
On 12/04/2011 07:25 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 8:03 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Let's shoot for an RC1 this week. I'll RM.
Do we have bundled apr/apr-util versions defined?
Ideally we want apr-util v1.4.0, which is yet to be released. I've proposed to
RM a release of apr-util
On Dec 4, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 8:03 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Let's shoot for an RC1 this week. I'll RM.
Do we have bundled apr/apr-util versions defined?
Ideally we want apr-util v1.4.0, which is yet to be released. I've proposed
to RM a release of
On Sunday 04 December 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I also
need to look at the event changes as well in trunk to see if
they are in 2.4.0 as well (or if they are something we could
easily add post 2.4.0)...
The event changes in trunk are not ready for 2.4, see
On 04 Dec 2011, at 10:58 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210219view=rev
Log:
-1 to introducing new months so late in the release cycle
But my lucky number is 13... :)
- * 20111303.0 (2.5.0-dev) Optional ap_proxy_retry_worker(), remove
Regards,
Graham
--
On 04 Dec 2011, at 7:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm +1 for committing as is and letting people test/patch
from there and then backporting ;)
Done in r1210261.
Can you give it a try?
Regards,
Graham
--
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 09:47 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 2, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
There seems to be a lot of renewed effort in getting 2.4/trunk is a
really releasable state, which is all Goodness. Ideally, I'd like
to release
On Dec 4, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 7:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm +1 for committing as is and letting people test/patch
from there and then backporting ;)
Done in r1210261.
Can you give it a try?
Thx. will do!
On 12/4/2011 10:01 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
mod_slotmem_plainplain
mod_slotmem_shmshared!
mod_socache_dbmdbm
mod_socache_dcdc
mod_socache_memcachemc!
mod_socache_shmcbshmcb
Should we align the provider names with the module names? E.g.
On 12/4/2011 3:59 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 10:58 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210219view=rev
Log:
-1 to introducing new months so late in the release cycle
But my lucky number is 13... :)
I suspect that adding an entire month would
On 12/4/2011 5:02 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 09:47 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 2, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
There seems to be a lot of renewed effort in getting 2.4/trunk is a
really releasable state, which is all
On 12/4/2011 6:08 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
-ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, rc, s,
+ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, rc, s, APLOGNO(00654)
Did you really mean for these to be in octal?
On 12/04/2011 10:33 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/4/2011 8:46 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Picking up this old discussion:
On 03.07.2011 19:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/1/2011 12:26 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Like said on another thread, give me couple of days and I'll fix the issue.
Well, as soon as I compile httpd-2.4 on windows which might be tricky cause
build procedure is completely broken and it doesn't compile any more out of
the box.
It has been
48 matches
Mail list logo
