Hi Pranesh,
I think you'll find that a GET request doesn't have a body to read.
All the information you can get is in the HTTP Request headers and the
URI/Query String which can be found in the tables and values on the
request_rec structure.
This is a much simpler thing to do that the POST/PUT
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:35 AM, André Malo wrote:
Here it's 80 chars (actually I'm use 78 personally) both about putting
multiple editors side by side and keeping diffs readable by email clients.
I'm in much the same mode: multiple 80 char wide windows
Things look stable.
Things look good.
Things look happy.
So are we ready to finally make this happen??
I offer to RM.
On 01/11/2012 04:17 AM, Martin Townsend wrote:
The problem occured when the POST request was split into two brigades
which are passed independently to my filter. So my first question is
this expected?
You should definitely expect that. Don't assume that the entire content
will always come
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Things look stable.
Things look good.
Things look happy.
So are we ready to finally make this happen??
I offer to RM.
Only outstanding issue from last series of thread I am aware of is
windows ssl socket reuse thing
On 11 Jan 2012, at 7:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Things look stable.
Things look good.
Things look happy.
So are we ready to finally make this happen??
I offer to RM.
+1.
Only outstanding issue from last series
On 1/11/2012 10:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Things look stable.
Things look good.
Things look happy.
So are we ready to finally make this happen??
I offer to RM.
I'm voting -1 on GA until we see something that we agree is GA :)
Totally +1 on making 2.4.0 happen, whether it is alpha,
On Jan 11, 2012, at 2:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/11/2012 10:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Things look stable.
Things look good.
Things look happy.
So are we ready to finally make this happen??
I offer to RM.
I'm voting -1 on GA until we see something that we agree is GA
On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Things look stable.
Things look good.
Things look happy.
So are we ready to finally make this happen??
I offer to RM.
Only outstanding issue from last series
On 1/11/2012 2:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What currently is not GA-worthy?
We vote on releases, not subversion. That was my point.
It is not yet the best available version, I believe 2.2.21 is. There
is far too much unexercised code in 2.4.0, new regressions and so forth,
that will only be
On 1/11/2012 5:51 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 14:41 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
cycles have taught us users aren't adopting our 2.odd releases. Sigh.
This is likely a carry over from the old days of the kernel, no-one dares run
a major.odd
on production boxes :)
On 1/3/2012 9:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I tried to reproduce with various AcceptFilter setting inclusing https none
using MSIE,
FF and Chrome. I always get the response on the first request.
Steffen, Gregg et. al.: Can you reproduce on a test system? Did you already
reproduce once
with
On 12/27/2011 12:21 PM, Steffen wrote:
Hard to catch, but I was lucky.
These are the steps with loglevel info:
Start httpd.exe with AcceptFilter https none
1) In browser https://devxp
2) response browser not found
in access log: nothing
in error log:
[ssl:info] [pid 2432:tid 1036]
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 18:00 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/11/2012 5:51 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 14:41 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
cycles have taught us users aren't adopting our 2.odd releases. Sigh.
This is likely a carry over from the old days of
On 1/11/2012 6:26 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Also, in relation to the windows stuff, I think Jim's suggestion is
most appropriate in the absence of more windows users to test.
If all we need is testing and some logging, I'd be happy to assist. If
someone can provide the compiled build and any
15 matches
Mail list logo
