On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.chwrote:
On 18.11.2013 14:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Has anyone looked at making ssl_die() clean up pools on the way out
(presumably by calling some function besides exit())? It is rather easy
to
end up with a bunch of
Any luck with generating the diff yet?
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The main thing is that it would be interesting to see
the diffs between '2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches
applied in order'
and '2.4.6 w proposed backport'...
With +1 votes from jim,covener,trawick,gsmith,breser,noel.butler,hiding,jblond
and h.reindl
and NO -1 votes, I call the voting closed with the
result of Releasing 2.4.7 as GA.
Thx to all testers and voters!
Will push to mirrors for announcement and release next week.
On Nov 19, 2013, at 12:45
Maybe sk_X509_NAME_pop_free(ca_list, X509_NAME_free) should be called too
before returning NULL in ssl_init_FindCAList() (so to avoid a leak in case
of failure).
Regards;
Yann.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Kaspar Brand
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:49:31 2012
New Revision: 1410459
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1410459view=rev
Log:
fdq expects a certain behavior from atomics... ensure that
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.7 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE
On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
+i = apr_atomic_dec32(foo);
+if (i = 0) {
Why can we expect i 0? apr_atomic_dec32 returns 0 if the dec
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org
wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
+i = apr_atomic_dec32(foo);
+
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as required for
event... if the check fails, it means that event has
been broken on that system, assuming it ever hit
blocked idlers, for a *long*
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as required for
event... if the check fails, it means that event has
been broken on that system, assuming it ever hit
blocked idlers, for a *long*
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as required for
event... if the check fails, it means that event has
On Nov 22, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note,
The thing is is not only do we worry about the return code
but also that the values we dec32 and inc32 also behave
as signed ints. Note below we worry also that queue_info-idlers
itself is signed, and can be 0 :
apr_status_t ap_queue_info_try_get_idler(fd_queue_info_t * queue_info)
{
int
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The thing is is not only do we worry about the return code
but also that the values we dec32 and inc32 also behave
as signed ints. Note below we worry also that queue_info-idlers
itself is signed, and can be 0 :
Okay
Sorry, I thought the diffs I sent off list were good enough. I'll have
to see if I even still have the original build lying around.
Effectively, I just took the list of patches in the backport proposal
and applied them one at a time to the 2.4.6 sources. If I can't find the
build, I'll do the same
20 matches
Mail list logo
