At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
will likely be revoked/dropped and 2.4.9 will be proposed
which either (1) removes r1573360 or (2) fixes this bug.
On Mar
On 12 Mar 2014, at 12:37 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
will likely be revoked/dropped and 2.4.9 will be
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
will likely be revoked/dropped and 2.4.9 will be proposed
which either (1)
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Yann Ylavic yla...@apache.org wrote:
Probably 2.4.8/STATUS should be fixed too.
no, we wouldn't retag the file, and we wouldn't regenerate the tarballs of
the same version to fix anything; if there's a truly hot issue to resolve
in a tagged version we'll bump
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
---
Hi,
please review and merge this. It seems to be an easyfix, but the ticket [1]
seemengly generated no useful attention.
Hi,
Where is the patched code maintained in ASF svn? Is that part of the Perl
project?
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Mittwoch, 12. März 2014 13:30
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.8 as GA
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8
On Mar 12, 2014, at 8:29 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
Anyone?
Regards
Rüdiger
-Original Message-
From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
Sent: Montag, 10. März 2014 11:22
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Turn off SSL session tickets
Reading the trunk documentation it seems possible to turn off SSL session
tickets via
On 12/03/2014 12:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
will likely be revoked/dropped and
On 10/03/2014 10:22, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
Reading the trunk documentation it seems possible to turn off SSL session
tickets via
SSLOpenSSLConfCmd Options -SessionTicket
I assume there are no other options doing so on 2.2.x and 2.4.x, correct?
A quick grep for the
On 12.03.2014 01:59, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 12/03/2014 00:30, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
The fix was applied on Feb 11 2013. That would mean that official releases
affected would be 0.9.8y, 1.0.0j and 1.0.1c. Any later official release
should
include the fix but we weren't planning to
Hello,
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 08:42 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
---
Hi,
please review and merge this. It seems to be an easyfix, but the ticket [1]
seemengly generated no useful attention.
Hi,
Where is the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 08:42 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
---
Hi,
please review and merge this. It seems to be an easyfix, but the
On 12.03.2014 14:55, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 12/03/2014 12:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says
I have added this is a SHOWSTOPPER patch for 2.4.x...
I will try to find a system where the bug exists to
test.
On Mar 12, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 12.03.2014 14:55, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 12/03/2014 12:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.03.2014 11:37,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:30:57 +
Dr Stephen Henson shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 11/03/2014 21:46, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 3/11/2014 1:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the
On 12.03.2014 18:39, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:30:57 +
Dr Stephen Henson shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 11/03/2014 21:46, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 3/11/2014 1:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs
On 12/03/2014 17:39, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The fix was applied on Feb 11 2013. That would mean that official
releases affected would be 0.9.8y, 1.0.0j and 1.0.1c. Any later
official release should include the fix but we weren't planning to
make any more 0.9.8 official releases though a
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Yann Ylavic yla...@apache.org wrote:
Probably 2.4.8/STATUS should be fixed too.
no, we wouldn't retag the file, and we wouldn't regenerate the tarballs of
the same version to fix
19 matches
Mail list logo
