On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:25 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017
> New Revision: 1790917
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790917&view=rev
> Log:
> Veto veto of veto
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ST
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> I was happy with the state of master as of Friday. I have not reviewed
> the final release package, however.
EFAIL
cd Brotli-0.6.0 && \
cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" \
-D CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib \
-D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../dst/httpd-
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> @wrowe - I think the updated proposal addresses the concerns around the
> optional processing. Would love if you can spare a few cycles before the
> upcoming 2.4.26 to review and offer your +1 or at least nyx the -.5 note
> in case that's
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:50 AM, wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Apr 10 11:50:26 2017
> New Revision: 1790806
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790806&view=rev
> Log:
> With v0.60 of https://github.com/google/brotli released,
> this is now viable again.
Agreed this is no longer 'being
Hello
This contribution has not met an enthousiast reaction. No comment, anyone?
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:05:48PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Hello
>
> If you tried to use mod_dav_fs with recent MS Office on Windows,
> you probably had the unpleaseant experience of being prompted for
> au
On 4/5/2017 12:55 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in 'remoteip_disable_networks', 'RemoteIPProxyProtocolDisableNetworks'
> should be updated to 'RemoteIPProxyProtocolExceptions' or
> cmd->cmd->name should used insteead.
> Fonction name (i.e. 'remoteip_disable_networks') could also be updat
On 04/10/2017 03:21 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 10.04.2017 um 22:41 schrieb Jacob Champion:
A few questions for the list while I'm brainstorming the best way to fix
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 ...
- What is the oldest version of OpenSSL we'll support for the 2.4.x
line? W
Am 10.04.2017 um 22:41 schrieb Jacob Champion:
A few questions for the list while I'm brainstorming the best way to fix
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 ...
- What is the oldest version of OpenSSL we'll support for the 2.4.x
line? Will that version change in 2.next?
For 2.4
A few questions for the list while I'm brainstorming the best way to fix
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 ...
- What is the oldest version of OpenSSL we'll support for the 2.4.x
line? Will that version change in 2.next?
- Does anyone have a clever way to check, during conf
Jim Jagielski writes:
> Let's shoot for a 2.4.26 within the next handful of
> weeks. There are some entries in STATUS that could
> use some love and attention, and I'm hoping/pushing
> for a Brotli[1] release so we can fold *that* capability
> in as well.
>
> 1. https://github.com/google/brotli
>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:47:53PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Is the failure really expected w/o listener buckets?
> It happens on bind ("Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock"),
> which is indeed not an issue with SO_REUSEPORT.
>
> I want to fix the leak of course but I wonder if we should:
11 matches
Mail list logo