Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29 >> An: httpd >> Betreff: Re:

AW: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 09:20 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >

AW: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29 > An: httpd > Betreff: Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - > /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.26 as GA

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > +1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 > > I have two quirks to record, both are openssl / openssl 1.1 related > but given the state of my AIX system I am still +1 on the release. > > - proxy/ssl.t almost totally fails with handhsake errors

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not

Re: win32: disable shared LDAP cache by default

whoops, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1824811 On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Which patch? I think you are missing a digit. > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> I am hoping this is fixed by

Re: win32: disable shared LDAP cache by default

Which patch? I think you are missing a digit. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > I am hoping this is fixed by > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=182481 which I > stumbled onto from another direction. > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Stefan

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> >>> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:

Re: svn commit: r25136 - /release/httpd/flood/

Speaking of, are these needed, or should we create attic/ ? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/flood/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_spdy/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_wombat/ and most content within http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/sandbox/ (as a sandbox/attic/)? I

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this >>>

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > This probably does not apply to 2.4.x (as a strong statement), in the > meantime we at least need the helpers and give a hand at updating the > modules, if we can't avoid extending our own structs... I agree this

Re: Licensing claims (pcreposix)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Any objections? +1

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this >> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.) >> Consider the shm array change

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> 1. We continue as we do now and allow extending structures at the end. We >> should probably document more prominently that >> copying

Licensing claims (pcreposix)

I made a fundamental mistake as we removed PCRE from the source tree of httpd; although we stopped distributing the pcre library in 2.4.x source tree, our own util_pcre.c is largely founded on the work of Philip Hazel/Cambridge; although the larger work doesn't need to be advertised in our LICENSE

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this > generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.) > Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into the "it is just > a longer struct" example. > Can you please

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 02/20/2018 08:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> In other words, modules from one STABLE release to another ARE binary >> compatible and do NOT need to be recompiled. >> >> >> This is clearly not true of several

Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On 02/20/2018 08:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > In other words, modules from one STABLE release to another ARE binary > compatible and do NOT need to be recompiled. > > > This is clearly not true of several recent changes, even though they > impact relatively few third party modules.

Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: minfrin >> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018 >> New Revision: 1824592 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824592=rev >> Log: >> Update

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > -1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues > noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, > we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some > backports in STATUS that could also be

Re: More information about "Help Wanted" task

Hello, I would also like to help and learn about the internals of httpd. Thanks, Adesh On 20/02/2018, Prafulla wrote: > Hi, > > I found following page on apache's "Help Wanted" about httpd. > >

Re: svn commit: r1824887 - in /httpd/site/trunk/tools: push.sh tag.sh

This is what I've been using: #!/bin/sh # if test "$#" != 1; then echo "USAGE: $0 TAG" >&2 exit 1 fi svn copy -m "Tag HEAD of 2.4.x as $1" https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/$1 > On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:17 AM,

Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Useful links: > > o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1812440 > o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1812442 > > These are easy to automate as well... I would suggest maybe 3 > scripts: pretag.sh (which

More information about "Help Wanted" task

Hi, I found following page on apache's "Help Wanted" about httpd. https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?8de2fbaee4e9d2335083802882abe85940407f8d I would like to explore helping httpd project. I can program in c/c++/python. Can someone suggest how I should start about it? I have downloaded the

Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/

Useful links: o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1812440 o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1812442 These are easy to automate as well... I would suggest maybe 3 scripts: pretag.sh (which readies the branch for tagging), tag.sh which does a simple svn cp and then

Re: svn commit: r1824887 - in /httpd/site/trunk/tools: push.sh tag.sh

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, wrote: > Author: druggeri > Date: Tue Feb 20 14:33:38 2018 > New Revision: 1824887 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824887=rev > Log: > Add some additional convenience tooling > > Added: [] > httpd/site/trunk/tools/tag.sh

RE: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/

> -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:47 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ > docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ > > > > > On Feb 19, 2018,

RE: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/

> -Original Message- > From: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:rpl...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ > docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ > > > > On 02/19/2018

Save the date: ApacheCon North America, September 24-27 in Montréal

Dear Apache Enthusiast, (You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to a user@ or dev@ list of one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.) We’re pleased to announce the upcoming ApacheCon [1] in Montréal, September 24-27. This event is all about you — the Apache project

Save the date: ApacheCon North America, September 24-27 in Montréal

Dear Apache Enthusiast, (You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to a user@ or dev@ list of one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.) We’re pleased to announce the upcoming ApacheCon [1] in Montréal, September 24-27. This event is all about you — the Apache project

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

If we could see the tooling it might be easier to vet it. > On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:39 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE]

Re: Test framework error on HEAD 2.4 (r1824869)

Thanks Jim. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Yep. All good now (r1824880) > >> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> Should be OK now with the right merge, right? >> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jim Jagielski

Re: Test framework error on HEAD 2.4 (r1824869)

Yep. All good now (r1824880) > On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > Should be OK now with the right merge, right? > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Confirmed that w/ r1824874, where the Event MPM changes >> had

Re: Test framework error on HEAD 2.4 (r1824869)

Should be OK now with the right merge, right? On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Confirmed that w/ r1824874, where the Event MPM changes > had been reverted, this no longer happens. > >> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

> -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 > > Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up > that a T will actually be happening... Yeah, you

Re: Test framework error on HEAD 2.4 (r1824869)

Confirmed that w/ r1824874, where the Event MPM changes had been reverted, this no longer happens. > On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > This is on macOS and using Event. Note that trunk > does not have this issue: > > Test Summary Report >

Test framework error on HEAD 2.4 (r1824869)

This is on macOS and using Event. Note that trunk does not have this issue: Test Summary Report --- t/apache/pr35292.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2

Re: svn commit: r1824868 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h include/httpd.h server/mpm/event/event.c

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM, wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Tue Feb 20 12:56:16 2018 > New Revision: 1824868 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824868=rev > Log: > Merge r1823047, r1824454, r1824463, r1824464, r1824497, r1824862 from trunk: [] > > MMN bump for

Re: mod_md in docu no valid Certificate Agreement

elukey did fix the agreements in trunk. Now merged into 2.4.x in r1824871. Thanks for checking. > Am 20.02.2018 um 13:42 schrieb Steffen : > > > In the mod_md 2.4 (not in trunk) documentation > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_md.html > > > I see three times:

mod_md in docu no valid Certificate Agreement

In the mod_md 2.4 (not in trunk) documentation https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_md.html I see three times: MDCertificateAgreement https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.1.1-August-1-2016.pdf This errors if not an existing account. It should be now (should be nice we have it

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up that a T will actually be happening... Yeah, you had noted the you were going to T on Monday (in the "T of 2.4.30 Proposal" thread) but sending out a quick "I plan on doing this in X hours" notice allows for some possible last-minute items to pop

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

-1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some backports in STATUS that could also be folded in. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > Hi, all; >

Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues

Re: Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues

Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:38:27 +0100): >Added  mod_proxy_uwsgi to installwinconf.awk and BasAddr.ref in trunk >and branches. Apache.dsw needs an addition too: ### Project:

Re: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 02/19/2018 07:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: minfrin > >> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018 > >> New Revision: 1824592 > >> > >> URL: