On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 21:20, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 4:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
Reporter suggests that *NOT*
new cleaned-up default for #LoadModule).
Thanks for the report, Jens.
Original Message
Subject: [users@httpd] 2.3.15-beta: module proxy_balancer requires the not
automatically
loaded module slotmem_shm
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:25:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Schleusener, Jens
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
Only, this is on the bleeding edge beta
On 09 Nov 2011, at 11:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I talked with Rainer about this and we came to the conclusion, that
we simply should keep non-default modules commented out, even if
they have been explicitly enabled with --enable-foo. This has also
the advantage that it is more likely
On 09.11.2011 13:53, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
On 11/9/2011 3:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely
On 09.11.2011 14:48, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 3:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency
On 11/9/2011 4:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
Reporter suggests that *NOT* loading mod_slotmem_shm caused the server
to start correctly; exactly the inverse of what we
On 09.11.2011 21:20, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 4:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
Reporter suggests that *NOT* loading mod_slotmem_shm caused the server
On 11/10/2011 1:08 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
No, his subject is module proxy_balancer requires the not automatically loaded
module
slotmem_shm (the not and not to not) and he writes
Ok, so I simply removed in the installed default httpd.conf the comment sign
within the line
#LoadModule
11 matches
Mail list logo
