+1
This sounds like a good way forward.
> Am 09.02.2018 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
>
>
>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this
>> was just a strawman?
>>
>
> That is a false statement
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this
> was just a strawman?
>
That is a false statement. If enough people wanted 2.6/3.0 to come
into existence, it would have.
All I want is new functionality t