This sounds like a good way forward.
> Am 09.02.2018 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>:
>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this
>> was just a strawman?
> That is a false statement. If enough people wanted 2.6/3.0 to come
> into existence, it would have.
> All I want is new functionality to be in our end-users hands
> in a reasonable time-frame. The *only* way to do that is
> via back porting to 2.4.x, due to the amount of time it
> will take to release 2.6/3.0. During that time, httpd will further
> lag behind, providing ammunition for further FUD and, IMO,
> not serving our community well.
> I will make a commitment: as soon as we get 2.4.30 out, assuming
> it has PROXY and uwsgi support, I will focus on helping get
> 2.6/3.0 out on a fast-track schedule. My plan will be to
> have a GM by sometime in May.