AW: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2014-09-05 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
All the changes we did regarding the sizes date back before branching 2.4.x Regards Rüdiger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 5. September 2014 12:20 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1622429 -

AW: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2014-09-04 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
But IMHO that would be a major bump and not a minor one. And we cannot do major ones in stable branches. Regards Rüdiger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 19:55 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn

AW: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2014-09-04 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 19:58 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote: Can we really