Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
http://stderr.net/history/topposters
cool, now i am tied with ben hyde.
haha, now i am 1
Thomas Eibner wrote:
One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
each person has made since '95:
Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 87510
1: ...
This comes up from time to time.
Ben Hyde wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
each person has made since '95:
Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 87510
1: ...
This
Ben Hyde wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
each person has made since '95:
Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 87510
1: ...
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:56:38AM -0400, Ben Hyde wrote:
This comes up from time to time. Somebody measures something; bugs
submitted, bugs fixes, lines written, commits made, documents written,
mails send, bylaws written, meetings attended, email threads started,
email threads ended, uses
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ben Hyde wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
each person has made since '95:
Total Posts on [EMAIL
At 5:15 AM +0200 5/15/02, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Apache httpd Release timeline
* Release Date
* Changelog / Release notes
* Tarball
* Usage statistics
* Other Important Release informaton
Version
Release Manager
Security Fixes
New Directives
Changed
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:33:00AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also useful, I think, would be a description of how the actual
coding environment changed, from people submitting patches and one
person being responsible for folding them into the code, the
3 +1s required for a patch to be
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Personally I'd rather see more effort put towards fixing tomorrow's code
than dwelling on code and processes from years ago.
One of the important roles that Apache plays, apart from being a damned
fine product, is as a model of how open software
Thomas Eibner wrote:
I agree, what I was more interested in was actually the sheer volume of
the mailinglist archive.
I've graphed volume (particularly in CVS's logging) over time, that's an
interesting way to keep an ear to the railroad tracks.
These statistics weren't created for
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 07:24:22PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 09:23:58AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1. I think it's a great idea... I'd like to propose it as an
ASF (sub)project.
+1 from me
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
http://stderr.net/history/topposters
cool, now i am tied with ben hyde.
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
http://stderr.net/history/topposters
cool, now i am tied with ben hyde.
haha, now i am 1 ahead of ben hyde, i'm #32 woohoo!
Francisco, CA
-Original Message-
From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache History Project - Call for comments
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Full list of posters with more than 10
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:30:49PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
http://stderr.net/history/topposters
cool, now i am tied with
Re: Apache History project, several folks wrote:
+1
Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
I figure we should get moving while we're
Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
I figure we should get moving while we're motivated, before real life
intrudes.
Should we make
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:46:58PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Should we make this part of the Docs project, and then if it starts
generating enough traffic it can be moved to its own list?
+1. -- justin
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
I figure we should get moving while we're
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:47:52PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
something else that needs to happen before that
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
Call for comments
Apache History Project
We are a few people that are of the opinion that saving a piece of
history is very important. That is why we have drafted this call for
comments. We want to save as much of Apache's history as possible
Rich Bowen wrote:
Well, the almost-complete lack of any response has made us wonder if our
initial note got lost somewhere. Anyways, a brief follow-up. If nobody
thinks that this is a terrible idea, we'd like to go forward with it,
+1. I think it's a great idea... I'd like to propose it
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
Well, the almost-complete lack of any response has made us wonder if our
initial note got lost somewhere. Anyways, a brief follow-up. If nobody
thinks that this is a terrible idea, we'd like to go
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 09:23:58AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1. I think it's a great idea... I'd like to propose it as an
ASF (sub)project.
+1 from me too.
+1
Tony.
+1
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
Call for comments
Apache History Project
We are a few people that are of the opinion that saving a piece of
history is very important. That is why we have drafted this call for
comments. We want to save as much of Apache's history
25 matches
Mail list logo
