On 07/04/2010 04:38 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 7/1/2010 1:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/01/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another
On 7/1/2010 1:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/01/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the
Enabled/Disabled
choice
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
On 6/29/2010 9:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a
As a reasonably heavy user of mod_proxy - all our web sites are
proxied through a pair of reverse proxies - would you be interested in
the problems we have encountered using it?
In particular, bug 45950 is symptomatic of our issues. We can't
adjust/tune our reverse proxy servers and
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those
requests targeted by session
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those
requests targeted by session
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mark Watts m.wa...@eris.qinetiq.com wrote:
A restart of httpd (graceful or otherwise) has no understanding that the
running config can be any different from that on disk.
Indeed, how would httpd differentiate between a restart to reconfigure a
given balancer
On Jun 30, 2010, at 8:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline,
On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those
requests targeted by session to that server. Once the number of sessions
settles on
On 6/29/2010 9:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those
requests targeted by session to
11 matches
Mail list logo