--On Wednesday, February 25, 2004 1:20 PM -0800 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hooking the cleanups to the connection pool may be a little too late for
some modules (Example SSL shutdown/SSL Alert). For filters like SSL, the EOC
logic would probably be just fine - I can't think
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 00:15, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new file.
I say
--On Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:49 PM -0800 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... brings up the question : do you still want the finish_connection hook OR
should the modules be content with the EOC bucket ?
I don't think we'd need a new hook. -- justin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:16:04AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:49 PM -0800 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... brings up the question : do you still want the finish_connection hook OR
should the modules be content with the EOC bucket ?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:16:04AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:49 PM -0800 Mathihalli,
Madhusudan wrote:
... brings up the question : do you still want the
finish_connection
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
This is just back to what we had patches for already: doing an SSL
shutdown on any EOF bucket, right? Which is not right since you get an
EOS after each HTTP response, not at the end of the connection.
Hence the need
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:59:00AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
This is just back to what we had patches for already: doing an SSL
shutdown on any EOF bucket, right? Which is not right since you get an
EOS
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new file.
I say httpd.
--Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new file.
Since the EOC bucket is
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:15:20PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new
Argh.. stupid e-mail client..
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go
in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go
in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new file.
I say httpd.
+1
--
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
mod_ssl-side I'd just use the changes in the most recent patch I posted
with the CLOSE bucket test replaced with the EOC bucket test in the
output filter: in my testing you needed to turn off buffering in
Oops.. A typo (in the second block - line 951,6...) during the cut-and-paste
operation. This mail has the corrected version.
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Mathihalli, Madhusudan
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 1:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [PATCH] SSL not sending close
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:05PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I started working on Justin's idea of creating a EOC bucket - to
do a SSL shutdown before the socket close(). But since the
ap_flush_conn is called just before closing the socket - I
thought of
Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SSL not sending close alert message
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:05PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I started working on Justin's idea of creating a EOC bucket
Oh.. forget it - it was some setting in my browser :(
Thanks
-Madhu
From: Mathihalli, Madhusudan
Sent: Mon 2/23/2004 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] SSL not sending close alert message
When I did a ssldump to analyze the default index.html
At 04:07 PM 2/23/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:05PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I started working on Justin's idea of creating a EOC bucket - to
do a SSL shutdown before the socket close(). But since the
ap_flush_conn is called just before
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I suspect that if the http protocol filter knew the difference between keep
alive and connection close requests, it should eat non-terminal EOS marks
(and pass flush instead?) while still passing a final EOS to the network
stack layer?
That
20 matches
Mail list logo
