Re: Rephrasing worker already used

2010-08-23 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.08.2010 20:30, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 08/10/2010 07:55 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 13:14 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Rephrasing worker

Re: Rephrasing worker already used

2010-08-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 13:14 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Rephrasing worker already used The message worker ... already used by another worker seems to not say

Re: Rephrasing worker already used

2010-08-10 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 08/10/2010 07:55 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 13:14 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Rephrasing worker already used The message worker ... already

Rephrasing worker already used

2010-08-05 Thread Rainer Jung
The message worker ... already used by another worker seems to not say what's actually happening. Situation: ProxyPass /X http://a.b.c.d/A ProxyPass /Y http://a.b.c.d/AB Wouldn't a message worker http://a.b.c.d/A; will also be used for URL /Y be more correct? In addition: we do overwrite

RE: Rephrasing worker already used

2010-08-05 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
-Original Message- From: Rainer Jung Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 13:14 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Rephrasing worker already used The message worker ... already used by another worker seems to not say what's actually happening. Situation: ProxyPass /X http