On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 04:43:27PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 03:33 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:19:35PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
What will R-T-C give us that we don't already have right now?
code quality...
really, this
At 03:01 PM 11/23/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 01:25 PM 11/23/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 11:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
+* This branch is operating under R-T-C
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
FWIW I agree with Jeff here. I retracted the statement since JimJ,
Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R.
So count this
R-T-C: Jeff, Will
C-T-R: JimJ, Cliff, Aaron
More voices are
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:08 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
FWIW I agree with Jeff here. I retracted the statement since JimJ,
Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R.
So count this
R-T-C:
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 03:33 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:19:35PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
What will R-T-C give us that we don't already have right now?
code quality...
really, this isn't meant as flame. There's enough room for code quality
increase,
