On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:08 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
FWIW I agree with Jeff here. I retracted the statement since JimJ,
Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R.
So count this
R-T-C: Jeff, Will
C-T-R: JimJ, Cliff, Aaron
More voices are always welcome.
I don't get your problem with R-T-C. we're doing so for all branches in
OpenBSD. our stable branches have maintainers, so if someone fixes a
bug he
thinks should go to stable he sends it to the stable maintainer and he
checks again before commiting. I do not see any developent slowdown
due to
R-T-C, but just a quality improvement.
We don't have any concept of code ownership within httpd, and therefore
can't have official "maintainers" of portions of httpd. If we
had more strict responsibilities, then R-T-C might work the way
you have described it above.
What will R-T-C give us that we don't already have right now?
-aaron
