On 7/6/2011 6:07 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I have vetoed the mess you've just referred to, and I expect wrowe to revert
this change
as per this project's rules.
Per the project rules, you have failed to offer a valid technical
justification for your veto. It represents an opinion. Right
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Bill,
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
It should be available via ap_config.h, either directly of via some
header included from there. It's in ap_config_auto.h on unix.
I see you
Am 06.07.2011 21:21, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
It should be available via ap_config.h, either directly of via some
header included from there. It's in
On 06 Jul 2011, at 1:18 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
I see you added ap_ldap.h[w|nw] which should define it, but for
NetWare mod_authnz_ldap.c still bails out:
CC mod_authnz_ldap.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
Hi Bill,
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
I see you added ap_ldap.h[w|nw] which should define it, but for NetWare
mod_authnz_ldap.c still bails out:
CC mod_authnz_ldap.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
#File: mod_authnz_ldap.c
#
Am 06.07.2011 01:18, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Hi Bill,
can you please tell me how it is intended to make mod_authnz_ldap.c
aware of AP_HAS_LDAP ?
I see you added ap_ldap.h[w|nw] which should define it, but for NetWare
mod_authnz_ldap.c still bails out:
CC mod_authnz_ldap.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
#
