Hello *,
in my apache module (written in C) are sended data to the client side over
buckets and brigades.
Function for send these date is:
apr_status_t send_data_to_client(request_rec *r, char * data_to_send, int
length_data)
{
apr_bucket_brigade * bb =
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:43 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Please share your thoughts on the topic.
I like that module.Since I have only one sever to configure /
maintain. I use 0.9.2 from Günther since 2007 on my windows dev
server. 0.9.5 compiles fine on VS9 and runs well.
Brian J. France wrote:
While Jari's mod_dav_acl is licensed under LGPL, can the patches to
httpd be licensed that way?
What would we need to do to get them added if Jari's patches (or even
mod_dav_acl) would fall under LGPL?
All Jari would need to do is email the list to confirm that he is
On 15 Sep 2009, at 05:43, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday
night, after
seven days of voting.
And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it
I see a crash caused by SSL_free in ssl_filter_io_shutdown:
#0 0x002a96b42879 in kill () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1 signal handler called
#2 0x002a959dcc97 in ASN1_template_free () from /lib64/libcrypto.so.4
#3 0x002a959dcc11 in ASN1_primitive_free () from /lib64/libcrypto.so.4
Petr Hracek wrote:
in my apache module (written in C) are sended data to the client side
over buckets and brigades.
Function for send these date is:
apr_status_t send_data_to_client(request_rec *r, char * data_to_send,
int length_data)
{
apr_bucket_brigade * bb =
Brian J. France wrote:
Jari is the original author of mod_dav_acl, which requires patches to
httpd to work. I need the same functionality added to httpd to get a
mod_dav_acl type module working, so I have split up his patch into
smaller pieces. Can a patch be under a different license than
I do not understand of this thing.
Could you please tell me if I have already connection between browser and
apache server why I should use request_rec-output_filters instead of
request_rec-connection-output_filters?
I thought that if connection is established than request_rec-connection
should
Petr Hracek wrote:
I do not understand of this thing.
Could you please tell me if I have already connection between browser
and apache server why I should use request_rec-output_filters instead
of request_rec-connection-output_filters?
I thought that if connection is established than
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad on
a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that we
use for the semaphore got clobbered but don't have proof yet. The
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Fri Sep 11 23:57:48 2009
New Revision: 814091
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=814091view=rev
Log:
htcacheclean: 19 ways to fail, 1 error message. Fixed.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Why does opt need to be cast to (int)?
From the printf man page:
c The int argument is converted to an unsigned char, and the
resulting character is written.
Why not simply zap all these checks of the form
if (silly user specified no-argument
I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
ap_pass_brigade(c-output_filters,bb);
and in smtp_core is usage the same.
Unfortunatelly when I am using ap_pass_brigade(r-output_filter,bb);
then it is not working. Web page is not show.
Is it neccessary to configure Apache for using brigade and
Petr Hracek wrote:
I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
ap_pass_brigade(c-output_filters,bb);
and in smtp_core is usage the same.
Neither of these modules implement http, so don't use them as examples
of how an http module should be implemented.
Unfortunatelly when I am using
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Petr Hracek phrac...@gmail.com wrote:
I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
ap_pass_brigade(c-output_filters,bb);
and in smtp_core is usage the same.
These are both modules that provide a non-HTTP protocol over the
connection. If that doesn't match
Petr Hracek wrote:
I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
ap_pass_brigade(c-output_filters,bb);
and in smtp_core is usage the same.
Those are protocol modules. So anything-HTTP is not relevant to them.
Unfortunatelly when I am using ap_pass_brigade(r-output_filter,bb);
then it is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Why does opt need to be cast to (int)?
From the printf man page:
c The int argument is converted to an unsigned char, and the
resulting character is written.
That's what
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
* Should we yank the squatting logic? I think it is doing us more harm
than good. IIRC it was put in to make the server respond faster when the
workload is spikey.
It finally occurred to me what you meant by spikey:
FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler|
Action].
If this mirrors the behavior of Action (in the way variables are
presented
to the fallback resource) then FallbackAction makes the most sense.
If it is restricted to a filespec at the same dir level, then perhaps
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can we compromise on the name NotFoundHandler, MissingFileHandler,
NotFoundAction, MissingFileAction, or any of a dozen other possible
variations that don't contain the misleading word Default?
FWIW, I preferred your earlier
Hi Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it seems appropriate to begin a vote
for dissolving mod_ftp from the httpd project. Please share your thoughts
on the topic.
please dont do that! Maybe that currently folks are otherwise busy (me
too), but that
Brian J. France wrote:
...
There is one draw back to this patch in that there could be duplicated
values in the headers. Both mod_dav_acl and mod_caldav want to add the
REPORT in the Allow header, so it would show up twice in the list. I am
not sure if this is a major problem, but wanted to
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Also, since its beta state we should probably also take test results of
non-commiters into account, f.e. Mario and Jorge?
We *always* (that is all of us, PMC members) consider everyone's votes and
commentary on all releases.
Although they are not binding, they are very
2009/9/15 Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com:
FallbackHandler and FrontController both make a lot of sense to me.
FrontController seems like it might be more correct, in terms of accepted
usage in the larger world out there, but either one makes me happy.
Looks like a name was found (or not). :-)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad
on a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Just zap the check since it is unnecessary.
So first you suggest that all the checks be collapsed down to one check,
I don't recall doing that, though I did suggest that if we keep the checks
we
I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
and a directory full of various revisions of the server configuration
file, and can only guess which of the configuration files was actually
being used.
Dan Poirier wrote:
I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
and a directory full of various revisions of the server configuration
file, and can only guess which of the configuration files was
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Dan Poirier wrote:
I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
and a directory full of various revisions of the
On 9/15/09 3:18 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I would prefer to just put it into the log file like Dan did.. not
everyone uses apachectl :)
+1
--
Brian Akins
On Sep 14, 2009, at 9:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday
night, after
seven days of voting.
And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it
Headline: Policy kills and up-and-coming star
Problems I see in no particular order;
1. Two subproject votes called simultaneously totaling 3 concurrent open
votes (fcgid, ftp, ServerTokens OFF), and a one let's get this ready to
vote (httpd 2.3.3). That's a lot to chew on, especially with
Guenter Knauf wrote:
I'd suggest you just let the vote stay, and once mod_cgid is out maybe
some more get to mod_ftp ...
I'm happy to do so, if Sander, yourself or others are interested in voting.
I'm unwilling to have an open ended vote thread dangling forever, of course.
A decision should be
Sander Temme schrieb:
So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it
into trunk.
+1
Gün.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday night,
after
seven days of voting.
And in 18
Sander Temme wrote:
So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it
into trunk.
You read my mind; not that ftp needs to be in trunk (that would be cool),
but that trunk has not been released in 4 years, which is a far more serious
issue than mod_ftp's 15 months :)
So
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Sander Temme schrieb:
So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it
into trunk.
+1
mod_ftp currently supports Apache 2.0 and 2.2 as well.
I think the natural order is to first establish a
Jeff Trawick wrote:
You misunderstood my comment (possibly because I didn't write it
clearly). What I meant by
Why not simply zap all these checks of the form
if (silly user specified no-argument option again) {
remind them who is boss
}
to avoid code bloat?
is that I didn't
Bill,
Mario just told me that there's no mod_ftp Win32 binary yet:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
maybe you can one upload?
Gün.
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Problems I see in no particular order;
1. Two subproject votes called simultaneously totaling 3 concurrent open
votes (fcgid, ftp, ServerTokens OFF), and a one let's get this ready to
vote (httpd 2.3.3). That's a lot to chew on, especially with all the
other
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But I wouldn't like to see any new roadblocks to getting out the first
alpha/beta of 2.3.x, at long last.
(and that goes for mod_fcgid as well, which should also go to trunk once
we've got just one release from trunk, and I'm guessing that vote will fly
with broad
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday night, after
seven days of voting.
And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it seems appropriate to begin a vote
for dissolving
fua...@apache.org wrote:
/* Special FTPOption that maps NLST directly to LIST */
-if (!is_list (fsc-options FTP_OPT_NLSTISLIST) || dashl) {
+if ((!is_list (fsc-options FTP_OPT_NLSTISLIST)) || dashl) {
is_list = 1;
}
Wouldn't this be
if (!is_list
Hi,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
Wouldn't this be
if (!is_list ((fsc-options FTP_OPT_NLSTISLIST) || dashl)) {
as there is no point otherwise? Actually we could drop the !is_list test,
considering that forced-override isn't harmful.
sorry, didnt look closely enough, please forgive -
Guenter Knauf wrote:
sorry, didnt look closely enough, please forgive - fixed with r815577.
No bother :) Not sure it's worth rerolling for, but the other item you
pointed out might be more significant. Looking at it.
45 matches
Mail list logo
