On 8/15/2012 8:23 PM, pqf wrote:
> But since someone said remove this sleep(), the server work fine without
> bottleneck(Maybe
> he didn't notise the warm up issue?), so I thought remove the sleep() is a
> good idea. But
> reduce the time of sleep() is fine to me too.
> Any other idea?
Can we in
procmgr_post_spawn_cmd(maybe it should be renamed to procmgr_send_spawn_cmd)
will keep blocking while PM is creating a new process, after
procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() return, there should be a process ready there waiting
for accept.
2012-08-16
pqf
发件人：William A. Rowe Jr.
发送时间：2012-08-16 15:23
2012/8/16 pqf :
> Hi, Michal
> My solution do "add availability to each class", which is the
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() call in each loop do.
> The sleep() call is intrudused for a stress test without warm up time, in
> this case, mod_fcgid will create more processes than a slow start one(each
> pr
How about this:
1. procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() now return a status code from PM, so process
handler now know the spawn request is denyed or not.
2. if a new process is created, no sleep is needed.
3. if no process is created, sleep a while
2012-08-16
pqf
发件人：Lazy
发送时间：2012-08-16 16:47
主题：Re: R
The -deps tarball was hidden (one had to look around for it) so
I just added a note that sometimes we provide it as a convenience.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
>
> I h
On 12.8.12 20:01, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>> a workaround is to call configure with
>> suitable {CPP,LD}FLAGS, i.e.
>>
>> CPPFLAGS=-I${openssl_build_dir}/include \
>> LDFLAGS=-L${openssl_build_dir} \
>> ./configure ...
>>
>> (when using the sh
