Re: svn commit: r1599625 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c

2015-09-28 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Hi, now that SO_REUSEPORT has landed on 2.4.x, it is easier to try to synch 2.4.x and trunk a bit more. I looked at r1599625 + r1599641, which set the TZ environment variable, if unset, in order to have a small performance boost. First, I've not been able to reproduce the 2% performance

Re: svn commit: r1705492 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/ server/mpm/event/ server/mpm/netware/ server/mpm/prefork/ server/mpm/winnt/ server/mpm/worker/

2015-09-28 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/27/2015 12:20 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote: > Author: minfrin > Date: Sat Sep 26 22:20:14 2015 > New Revision: 1705492 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705492=rev > Log: > MPMs: Support SO_REUSEPORT to create multiple duplicated listener > records for scalability. > > Submitted

Re: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today. > > > On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > > On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: > > > >>

Re: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
All done locally... waiting for SVN to come back up.

Re: svn commit: r1705492 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/ server/mpm/event/ server/mpm/netware/ server/mpm/prefork/ server/mpm/winnt/ server/mpm/worker/

2015-09-28 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 09/27/2015 12:20 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: minfrin >> Date: Sat Sep 26 22:20:14 2015 >> New Revision: 1705492 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705492=rev >> Log: >> MPMs: Support

Re: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 28 Sep 2015, at 2:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > >> + ylavic: Should we really change the (implicit) default in 2.4.x at > >> + this stage (and potentially break existing

AW: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 19:00 > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at

Re: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > By which we mean TTLv1.0/SSLv3 because there is so little technical > difference between them. AORN { I think there is enough difference to disable one by default and not the other. The final straw for SSLv3 was

Re: svn commit: r1705492 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/ server/mpm/event/ server/mpm/netware/ server/mpm/prefork/ server/mpm/winnt/ server/mpm/worker/

2015-09-28 Thread Marion & Christophe JAILLET
Le 28/09/2015 21:54, Ruediger Pluem a écrit : Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h?rev=1705492=1705491=1705492=diff == ---

Errors on trunk

2015-09-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
mod_proxy_balancer.c:1260:30: error: address of array 'balancer->s->sticky' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion] if (balancer->s->sticky) { ~~ ~^~ mod_proxy_balancer.c:1277:30: error: address of array

Re: AW: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Sep 28, 2015 1:08 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" < ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: > > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] > > Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 19:00 > > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List

Re: svn commit: r1705695 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_h2.xml

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Covener
please revise as desired, just wanted to get something started On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:03 AM, wrote: > Author: covener > Date: Mon Sep 28 14:03:27 2015 > New Revision: 1705695 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705695=rev > Log: > add an experimental warning to h2

Re: [Patch] Async write completion for the full connection filter stack

2015-09-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
This is super cool magic mojo. > On Sep 27, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think I have cracked the async problem for both request and connection > output filters with this patch. > > It provides three new functions: > > -

Re: svn commit: r1705571 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread Stefan Eissing
Adding comment "Added ap_parse_token_list_strict() to httpd.h" and applied patch to http/branches/2.4.17-protocols-http2 //Stefan > Am 27.09.2015 um 22:36 schrieb j...@apache.org: > > Author: jim > Date: Sun Sep 27 20:36:10 2015 > New Revision: 1705571 > > URL:

Re: svn commit: r1705492 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/ server/mpm/event/ server/mpm/netware/ server/mpm/prefork/ server/mpm/winnt/ server/mpm/worker/

2015-09-28 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > should r1629916 also be included? > The changelog says that it is a follow up to r1629909, which is included in > the patch below. My bad, I forgot to include it in the backport proposal/patch

Re: [Patch] Async write completion for the full connection filter stack

2015-09-28 Thread Graham Leggett
On 27 Sep 2015, at 8:41 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > I think I have cracked the async problem for both request and connection > output filters with this patch. Well, cracked the async problem for all file buckets and non-morphing buckets, morphing buckets will currently still

Re: svn commit: r1705695 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_h2.xml

2015-09-28 Thread Mike Rumph
See below: On 9/28/2015 7:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote: Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_h2.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_h2.xml?rev=1705695=1705694=1705695=diff

http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or _http2_module. Currently, both trunk and 2.4.x are broken when building w/ h2 since it tries to include *both*

Re: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Stefan Eissing
Jim, woot! Thx for backporting! > Am 28.09.2015 um 15:27 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now > we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out > whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or

Re: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:50 AM, wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Mon Sep 28 08:50:46 2015 > New Revision: 1705618 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705618=rev > Log: > Compatibility issue? > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2015-09-28 Thread Graham Leggett
On 28 Sep 2015, at 2:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> + ylavic: Should we really change the (implicit) default in 2.4.x at >> + this stage (and potentially break existing configuratios w/o >> + SSLProtocol which used to work with SSLv3 only capable >>

Re: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Mads Toftum
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now > we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out > whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or _http2_module. > > Currently, both trunk and

Re: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Graham Leggett
On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: > I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module > does (avoid confusion with H2 database) and because that's how other > protocol modules like mod_http and mod_ftp are named. +1. Regards, Graham —

AW: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm] > Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 15:44 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: http/2 in 2.4.x > > On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: > > > I wish you'd

Re: http/2 in 2.4.x

2015-09-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today. > On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: > >> I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module >> does (avoid