Hi,
now that SO_REUSEPORT has landed on 2.4.x, it is easier to try to synch
2.4.x and trunk a bit more.
I looked at r1599625 + r1599641, which set the TZ environment variable,
if unset, in order to have a small performance boost.
First, I've not been able to reproduce the 2% performance
On 09/27/2015 12:20 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Sat Sep 26 22:20:14 2015
> New Revision: 1705492
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705492=rev
> Log:
> MPMs: Support SO_REUSEPORT to create multiple duplicated listener
> records for scalability.
>
> Submitted
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today.
>
> > On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> >
> > On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
> >
> >>
All done locally... waiting for SVN to come back up.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2015 12:20 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Sat Sep 26 22:20:14 2015
>> New Revision: 1705492
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705492=rev
>> Log:
>> MPMs: Support
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 2:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> >> + ylavic: Should we really change the (implicit) default in 2.4.x at
> >> + this stage (and potentially break existing
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 19:00
> An: Apache HTTP Server Development List
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1705618 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> By which we mean TTLv1.0/SSLv3 because there is so little technical
> difference between them.
AORN {
I think there is enough difference to disable one by default and not
the other. The final straw for SSLv3 was
Le 28/09/2015 21:54, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h?rev=1705492=1705491=1705492=diff
==
---
mod_proxy_balancer.c:1260:30: error: address of array 'balancer->s->sticky'
will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
if (balancer->s->sticky) {
~~ ~^~
mod_proxy_balancer.c:1277:30: error: address of array
On Sep 28, 2015 1:08 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" <
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 19:00
> > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List
please revise as desired, just wanted to get something started
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:03 AM, wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Mon Sep 28 14:03:27 2015
> New Revision: 1705695
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705695=rev
> Log:
> add an experimental warning to h2
This is super cool magic mojo.
> On Sep 27, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think I have cracked the async problem for both request and connection
> output filters with this patch.
>
> It provides three new functions:
>
> -
Adding comment
"Added ap_parse_token_list_strict() to httpd.h"
and applied patch to http/branches/2.4.17-protocols-http2
//Stefan
> Am 27.09.2015 um 22:36 schrieb j...@apache.org:
>
> Author: jim
> Date: Sun Sep 27 20:36:10 2015
> New Revision: 1705571
>
> URL:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> should r1629916 also be included?
> The changelog says that it is a follow up to r1629909, which is included in
> the patch below.
My bad, I forgot to include it in the backport proposal/patch
On 27 Sep 2015, at 8:41 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I think I have cracked the async problem for both request and connection
> output filters with this patch.
Well, cracked the async problem for all file buckets and non-morphing buckets,
morphing buckets will currently still
See below:
On 9/28/2015 7:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_h2.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_h2.xml?rev=1705695=1705694=1705695=diff
I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now
we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out
whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or _http2_module.
Currently, both trunk and 2.4.x are broken when building w/ h2
since it tries to include *both*
Jim,
woot! Thx for backporting!
> Am 28.09.2015 um 15:27 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now
> we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out
> whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:50 AM, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Mon Sep 28 08:50:46 2015
> New Revision: 1705618
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1705618=rev
> Log:
> Compatibility issue?
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified:
On 28 Sep 2015, at 2:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> + ylavic: Should we really change the (implicit) default in 2.4.x at
>> + this stage (and potentially break existing configuratios w/o
>> + SSLProtocol which used to work with SSLv3 only capable
>>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now
> we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out
> whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or _http2_module.
>
> Currently, both trunk and
On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
> I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module
> does (avoid confusion with H2 database) and because that's how other
> protocol modules like mod_http and mod_ftp are named.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
—
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm]
> Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 15:44
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: http/2 in 2.4.x
>
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
>
> > I wish you'd
Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today.
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
>
>> I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module
>> does (avoid
25 matches
Mail list logo