this broke something. i keep getting:
% t/TEST
...
waiting for server to start: ok (waited 0 secs)
...
still waiting for server to warm up: ok (waited 1 secs)
failed to start server! (please examine t/logs/error_log)
and yet the server is running.
That would be my patch to detect an 'extra unused arg' to httpd.
As it is, there was no quick-fix I could see, so I've reverted.
Update your httpd-2.0 cvs
- Original Message -
From: Doug MacEachern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:34 AM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
That would be my patch to detect an 'extra unused arg' to httpd.
As it is, there was no quick-fix I could see, so I've reverted.
Update your httpd-2.0 cvs
In this particular case it was a bug in my latest patch. It's fixed now.
- Original Message -
From: Doug
Doing this on Win32 (NT4), I have a t\SKIP file containing:
modules/dav
ssl/all
And yet I get these when running t\TEST. And yes, I've tried it
with sloshes rather than slashes. Is it checking for requirements
*before* checking t\SKIP?
modules\dav.skipped: cannot find module 'dav',
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Doing this on Win32 (NT4), I have a t\SKIP file containing:
modules/dav
ssl/all
Stone me! OtherBill was right; these need to be specified as
modules\\dav
ssl\\all
on Win32. Bleargh..
Thanks, Bill!
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Doing this on Win32 (NT4), I have a t\SKIP file containing:
modules/dav
ssl/all
Stone me! OtherBill was right; these need to be specified as
modules\\dav
ssl\\all
on Win32. Bleargh..
May be the SKIP file's parser should complain when it
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to see the modules::dav syntax adopted
+1
This would certainly make things more consistent/simple to document.
Don't you mean 'more consistent::simple'? :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer,
Stas Bekman wrote:
modules\\dav
ssl\\all
May be the SKIP file's parser should complain when it cannot find the
specified files?
No, I don't think so -- then you'd have to special-case wildcards.
I'd just rather it was consistent -- and even better, platform-neutral.
I like OtherBill's
Stas Bekman wrote:
In this particular case it was a bug in my latest patch. It's fixed now.
Eh, I'm now getting this on Win32:
perl t\TEST
apache.exe -v failed: Bad file descriptor at
Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm line 687.
??
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini
Stas Bekman wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Eh, I'm now getting this on Win32:
perl t\TEST
apache.exe -v failed: Bad file descriptor at
Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm line 687.
I don't think this has anything to do with this. If the line counter
wasn't shifted,
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with this. If the line counter
wasn't shifted, you've got a broken Symbol::gensym.
The failing line is:
open $handle, $cmd| or die $cmd failed: $!;
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar,
Hello William...
This is Kevin Kiley again...
See comments inline below...
In a message dated 11/28/2001 10:59:26 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:30 AM
In a message dated 11/28/2001 10:21:46 PM Pacific
Thank goodness for compilers who can read xprintf syntax, and thanks for taking
a few minutes on this, Jeff.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:30 AM
Subject: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support ab.c
trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank goodness for compilers who can read xprintf syntax, and thanks for taking
and thank goodness for cron and unattended updates/builds that
compare old make.stderr with new make.stderr and send e-mail as
appropriate :)
--
Jeff Trawick |
Pavel,
Your patch looks good. It looks like a much cleaner solution.
What version of Winsock have you tested this patch with? Did you try it
on NW6? As soon as I get some time to implement it and test it myself,
I will get it checked in.
thanks,
Brad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday,
In a message dated 11/29/2001 3:23:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
What is the http content-encoding value for this facility? deflate
Ergo, mod_deflate.
And the name change from mod_gz to mod_deflate was suggested
by Roy,
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:20 am, Brian Pane wrote:
From a performance perspective, the two limitations that I see in
the current worker implementation are:
* We're basically guaranteed to have to do an extra context switch on
each connection, in order to pass the connection from
In a message dated 11/29/2001 3:23:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As described by Ken? Once again, what would he have to do
with that?
I just happen to be the chap with the cron job that sends
the current STATUS file every Wednesday. I don't maintain it;
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
Weren't the thread management problems with the threaded MPM
related specifically to shutdown? If it's just shutdown that's
a problem, it may be possible to solve it.
Graceful restart was the big problem.
--Cliff
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:20:48AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
From a performance perspective, the two limitations that I see in
the current worker implementation are:
* We're basically guaranteed to have to do an extra context switch on
each connection, in order to pass
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:31:01AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:20 am, Brian Pane wrote:
So...please forgive me if this has already been considered and dismissed
a long time ago, but...why can't the listener and worker be the same
thread?
That's where we were
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:48 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:31:01AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:20 am, Brian Pane wrote:
So...please forgive me if this has already been considered and
dismissed a long time ago, but...why can't the
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:41 am, Brian Pane wrote:
Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:20 am, Brian Pane wrote:
From a performance perspective, the two limitations that I see in
the current worker implementation are:
* We're basically guaranteed to have to do an extra
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:45 am, Brian Pane wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:20:48AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
From a performance perspective, the two limitations that I see in
the current worker implementation are:
* We're basically guaranteed to have to do an
Ryan Bloom wrote:
The model that Brian posted is exactly what we used to do with threaded,
if you had multiple ports.
No, you're missing a key difference. There's no intra-process mutex in
Brian's MPM.
One thread at a time is chosen to be the accept thread without using a
mutex. Once
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:59:10AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:45 am, Brian Pane wrote:
Right--the fact that the transaction pools are children of a pool
owned by the listener thread means that we have to do locking when
we destroy a transaction pool (to avoid
Brad, I've tested my patch on NW5.1 SP3+ box with the latest (Beta)
patches installed (011022n5 = wsock4f, ...), not running other
versions/configurations of NetWare such as NW6, so I can't test it here.
I'm not absolutely sure if WSAIoctl(..., SO_SSL_GET_FLAGS,...) is 100%
okay. I have no
And the name change from mod_gz to mod_deflate was suggested
by Roy, whom I think knows HTTP better than anyone else here..
Knowing HTTP is one thing... knowing compression formats is another.
Heh, that's amusing.
Does the output of mod_deflate have a GZIP and/or ZLIB header on it, or
I've got a piped logfile program I write to handle my logfiles, and
someone using it on Solaris said that when they try to restart apache,
it hangs on waiting for the piped program to terminate. Last time I
checked Apache puts out a SIGHUP and then a SIGTERM to all child
processes. The program
Hi,
I have written a ISAPI extension (which is basically a dll) which does some
db query stuff. I want this extension to be loaded in the memory as long as
apache is running. In new Apache release (2.0) this particular feature has
been implemented, that's by using directive ISAPICacheFile. When
On Thursday 29 November 2001 12:12 pm, Michal Szymaniak wrote:
Hello again.
It is now possible to write a module that will make Apache listen on
UDP ports. However, as somebody who has done this in the past,
it's not a good idea. You lose too much data on every request.
Could you
It's kinda crufty, but so are a lot of other things in 1.3. It is a small patch which
is
goodness and I appreciate what it is used for.
If it is useful enough for you to be still interested in it after a month, I'll add my
+1
to Gregs :-)
+1
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Kevin
hi.
I was just wondering if anyone knows why rewrite won't allow a subrequest
to work on a directory rewrite rule.
It's looks like the code has been in there forever...
here's the code fragment I'm talking about.
static int hook_fixup(request_rec *r)
{
rewrite_perdir_conf *dconf;
I haven't had time to verify it myself, but I have been told that it is happening.
Mod_cgi is not actually writing error message from the script to the error_log.
I would consider this a major showstopper!
Ryan
__
Ryan Bloom
Brian Pane wrote:
From a performance perspective, the two limitations that I see in
the current worker implementation are:
* We're basically guaranteed to have to do an extra context switch on
each connection, in order to pass the connection from the listener
thread to a worker
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:18 PM
I haven't had time to verify it myself, but I have been told that it is happening.
Mod_cgi is not actually writing error message from the script to the error_log.
I would consider this a major showstopper!
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:18:00PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I haven't had time to verify it myself, but I have been told that it is happening.
Mod_cgi is not actually writing error message from the script to the error_log.
I would consider this a major showstopper!
It's working fine for me
Content-Length is not passed through proxy requests, when Apache 2.0 is
used as the proxy.
Is it a bug?
Feature?
Limitation?
Or is it just me? My configuration?
Many clients depend on this data, for example audio/video players, so
it is quite bad to lack CL.
Is there any way to tell the API
On Thursday 29 November 2001 08:01 pm, Eli Marmor wrote:
Content-Length is not passed through proxy requests, when Apache 2.0 is
used as the proxy.
Is it a bug?
Feature?
Limitation?
Or is it just me? My configuration?
Many clients depend on this data, for example audio/video players,
39 matches
Mail list logo
