On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:33:27PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O.k., now that is interesting, another thing I've noticed is that when
the encoding is chunked, I can't replicate the problem. Presumably the
problem is related to how much data is trying to be sent down the
socket at once.
Well, note that Apache
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:12:04AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O.k., now that is interesting, another thing I've noticed is that when
the encoding is chunked, I can't replicate the problem. Presumably the
problem is related to how much data is
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken right now.
stupid pre-test patch, here's the real one:
Index: configure.in
As Jeff suggested a while back do we know which versions of the linux kernel
are affected by this problem? If so we can probably have the flag
automagically set.
Otherwise this looks OK to me.
david
- Original Message -
From: Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Sounds like a reasonable compromise.
I'm not a huge fan of using STATUS for these things, but it's as good a
place as anywhere else.
david
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:44 PM
Subject: compromise on RTC
Hi all,
I have just tried applying some load to Apache v2.0.43 + mod_ldap +
mod_auth_ldap, and after a while, auth breaks.
The reason is shown by netstat:
tcp0 0 trilobite:48703 trilobite:ldap
ESTABLISHED
tcp0 0 trilobite:48683 trilobite:ldap
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken right now.
stupid pre-test patch, here's the real one:
patch
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken
At 07:18 AM 12/4/2002, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that --disable-sendfile isnt an option
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that --disable-sendfile isnt an option configure
knows anything about, the right one
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:29:29PM -, David Reid wrote:
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:29:29PM -, David Reid wrote:
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with
your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing...
did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that
Hi to all,
I built deflate and jk but deflate seems to compress
only static (ie no servlet/jsp) contents.
I've used :
Listen x.x.x.x:y
NameVirtualHost x.x.x.x:y
VirtualHost x.x.x.x:y
ServerName host.domain.tld
AddOutputFilter DEFLATE html
Directory
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Henri Gomez wrote:
I built deflate and jk but deflate seems to compress
only static (ie no servlet/jsp) contents.
AddOutputFilter DEFLATE html
Either I'm missing something silly, or you are. But don't you want
SetOutputFilter DEFLATE
What you have won't work
You are only installing the DEFLATE filter on files that end in .html. Try this
instead:
SetEnv gzip-only-text/html 1
SetOutputFilter DEFLATE
Bill
Hi to all,
I built deflate and jk but deflate seems to compress
only static (ie no servlet/jsp) contents.
I've used :
Listen x.x.x.x:y
hi all...
I've been looking at how output filters and caching headers
interact (in mod_perl land, but the principles are the same). anyway,
I had a real-life scenario where I thought the API wasn't all that
intuitive and wanted to maybe get some feedback or clarification.
currently
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as David Reid reminded, the flag needs to default to 0 on the right
Linux boxen... unless/until we get specific info, I plan to tweak
your patch to default it to --disable when building on Linux 2.4.x...
relatively few users who would encounter
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util
--On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 10:42 AM -0500 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are only installing the DEFLATE filter on files that end in
.html. Try this instead:
SetEnv gzip-only-text/html 1
SetOutputFilter DEFLATE
Um, wouldn't:
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html
be
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Um, wouldn't:
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html
be better? gzip-only-text/html really isn't needed.
There are some problems with AddOutputFilterByType. It doesn't work with
DefaultType, and it doesn't work with modules that change the
You are only installing the DEFLATE filter on files that end in
.html. Try this instead:
SetEnv gzip-only-text/html 1
SetOutputFilter DEFLATE
Um, wouldn't:
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html
be better? gzip-only-text/html really isn't needed.
Yea, that occured to me as
--On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 5:23 PM -0800 Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some problems with AddOutputFilterByType. It doesn't
work with DefaultType, and it doesn't work with modules that
change the type unless they do the right thing (which many of
them don't; I don't
There was some discussion about this a few weeks ago, under the
subject mod_cache and multiple brigade. It does seem to be a
bug that mod_proxy is removing the content-length. I'll commit
a fix to the 2.1 branch tonight and port it back to 2.0 if nobody
objects.
Brian
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/10/31 05:57:52 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/12/03 18:26:44 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
--On Tuesday, December 3, 2002 8:10 AM -0800 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit more reasonable to me. That is, send chunked if
the client will accept chunked, else send a connection: close
header (which will tell the client we are done sending). As a
compromise, we could
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:38:06PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
Colm, can you try running the apr/test/sendfile binary with your
machines?
It was one of the first things I tried when I was debugging,
unfortunately, it doesnt
Oh, I hate to get more email that I just delete as soon as it comes
in, but should we start sending out STATUS mailings for httpd 2.1 (or
rather the stable branch for httpd 2.0)?
Does anyone actually read these things though?
How about switching it to sending out a simple email that points to
30 matches
Mail list logo
