Bad Gateway: The message has been attached.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Panda AntiVirus - www.pandasoftware.com
Jem Berkes wrote:
Is this the right way or is there an example module I could compare
with?
I noticed a couple posts about examples, there is now one as I have
committed all the RBL stuff I wrote. See:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/mod_smtpd_rbl/
This hooks into mo
> Hopefully later today I should have this completely done and checked in.
I waited for Rian to update the mod_smtpd structures, and I have now
checked in my code for RBL functionality. There are README files in both
directories describing use. However could someone tell me how to properly
use
> Is this the right way or is there an example module I could compare
> with?
I noticed a couple posts about examples, there is now one as I have
committed all the RBL stuff I wrote. See:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/mod_smtpd_rbl/
This hooks into mod_smtpd in two plac
Hi, I've downloaded the mod_ftpd's src from
http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_ftpd/ and have
installed it on my WinXP box. When I read the code, I found some
problem and got some thought. I don't know if this is the right
place to put the idea, but I've mailed the author yesterday, and
d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: soc-rian
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:38:56 2005
New Revision: 239318
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239318&view=rev
Log:
Made smtpd_run_queue a RUN_ALL hook (so multiple plugins can handle the message)
This is another example of a change that makes numerous unr
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 23:37, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > Modified: httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/mod_smtpd.h
> > URL:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/mod_smtpd.h?rev=235759&r1=235758&r2=235759&view=diff
> > =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: soc-rian
Date: Mon Aug 22 10:22:27 2005
New Revision: 235759
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=235759&view=rev
Log:
mod_smtpd overhaul:
1. new structs: smtpd_conn_rec, smtpd_trans_rec
2. different i/o API: smtpd_getline, smtpd_respond_oneline,
smtpd_respo
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 23:17, Brian J. France wrote:
> Trying to build build a smtpd module, but having a problem. I added a
> line like this:
>
>smtpd_hook_connect( smtpd_access_dbi_connect, NULL, NULL,
> APR_HOOK_MIDDLE );
>
> in the register_hooks function, but when I load the module I g
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:54:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 8/19/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >On 8/19/05, Kaushal Jha - ZEDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> hey guys,
> >>I observed that only apache 1.3 (1.3.33) sends out the
> >> extra characters
Trying to build build a smtpd module, but having a problem. I added a
line like this:
smtpd_hook_connect( smtpd_access_dbi_connect, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE );
in the register_hooks function, but when I load the module I get
undefined function _smtpd_hook_connect.
Is this the right w
Paul A Houle wrote:
[..cut..]
> very little to offer end users. A few people thought it would be great
> to have pluggable MPM's, and a few other people introduced half-baked
> systems such as mod_cache and filters. You know a tree by its fruit,
What is half-baked about filters? Without t
Paul A Houle wrote:
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
I see a lot of frustration going on. The thing is, httpd's
development process is nearly identical to Subversion's process... we
stole most of it from you folks! So why all the angst in httpd-land,
but not in Subversion-land?
Too many vers
Paul A Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I don't see excellence coming from "swiss army knife" frameworks
> that do everything, but from systems that are developed from a whole
> system viewpoint, that have a good amount of codesign between layers of
> the system -- if you build a system
Paul A Houle wrote:
I don't see end users clamoring for mod_ftp, or mod_snmpd. What's
the point of writing a squid replacement unless you can actually make
something better?
That's why I have been posting so many cache patches.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Techno
Paul A Houle wrote:
>
>
> mod_ftp will underperform mainstream ftp servers so long as its
> running under prefork. Similarly, cacheing proxy servers will
> outperform squid.
>
Simple "performance" isn't everything. Stability, reliability, ease
of administration, etc are all factors whic
Paul A Houle wrote:
I don't see end users clamoring for mod_ftp, or mod_snmpd. What's
the point of writing a squid replacement unless you can actually make
something better?
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that it's the users who
decide what the project does. Apache projec
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Paul A Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IMO market-share doesn't relate to project activity. The
word I most associate with apache development is empowerment;
cheifly to empower users to build better web stuff. Users that
need to tweak the software in order to make that h
On 8/22/05, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:59:12PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > yes; handles both families for Listen [::]:10101
> >
> > so better work-around IF THIS PROBLEM OCCURS is to use that form of Listen
>
> ./configure --enable-v4-mapped
>
> s
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
[..cut..]
>
> "Release from trunk every 4-6 months. Only backport critical
> bugfixes."
>
I think this is too often for httpd releases. From my point of view 1 year
would be ok.
I think we need longer periods for that than subversion because the user base
i
Paul A Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
>> I see a lot of frustration going on. The thing is, httpd's development
>> process is nearly identical to Subversion's process... we stole most
>> of it from you folks! So why all the angst in httpd-land, but not in
>>
Hi,
I just have committed mod_smtpd with changes that free it from
request_rec. There are now two major structures in mod_smtpd:
smtpd_conn_rec, and smtpd_trans_rec. These are distinguished by how
often these get cleared.
Also mod_smtpd no longer uses the ap_getline and ap_rprintf functions
for I
Hi,
I just have committed mod_smtpd with changes that free it from
request_rec. There are now two major structures in mod_smtpd:
smtpd_conn_rec, and smtpd_trans_rec. These are distinguished by how
often these get cleared.
Also mod_smtpd no longer uses the ap_getline and ap_rprintf functions
for I
On Aug 20, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Bundled with APR & APR-Util 1.2.1:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.7/
Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.7 as beta.
Thanks,
-Paul
+1 on Sol8 and OS X 10.4.2
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:59:12PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> yes; handles both families for Listen [::]:10101
>
> so better work-around IF THIS PROBLEM OCCURS is to use that form of Listen
./configure --enable-v4-mapped
should fix it, no?
--
Colm MacCárthaighPublic K
On 8/20/05, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bundled with APR & APR-Util 1.2.1:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.7/
>
> Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.7 as beta.
+1 for beta (tested on AIX 5.3) provided that we prominently mention
the glitches and related work-arou
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
I see a lot of frustration going on. The thing is, httpd's
development process is nearly identical to Subversion's process... we
stole most of it from you folks! So why all the angst in httpd-land,
but not in Subversion-land?
It's really a lack of direction
On 8/22/05, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:16:57AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Any reasonable place to put release notes like the following form?
.
> > the work-around is to make the Listen directive IPv4-specific (e.g.,
> > "Listen 0.0.0.0:10101");
>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> > Also;
> >
> > htcacheclean is known not to work in this beta, and if used will
> > consistently delete the entire contents of a cache-store. Please
> > apply the $patch, if you intend to use htcacheclean.
>
> That sounds to
"Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree with the idea...
>
> Kudos on the function name.
Oops, it doesn't follow our naming conventions tho, so I better
change it to apreq_charset_divine. The other upshot to having
a public function available, is that we no longer have to monk
Nick Kew wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2005 16:35, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:16:57AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>>Any reasonable place to put release notes like the following form?
>>>
>>> some compilers may not like C++ comments and fail to build, showing an
>>>
On Monday 22 August 2005 16:35, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:16:57AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Any reasonable place to put release notes like the following form?
> >
> > some compilers may not like C++ comments and fail to build, showing an
> > error on line XXX of
Joe Schaefer wrote:
In its current form, the internal url_decode() function is a total mess.
Besides simple url-decoding, it does charset divination. It turns out to
be a lot cleaner to do the divination *after* decoding (not *during*),
so I'd like to propose a new function
apreq_charset_t ap
Hi All,
I have added one directive for secret-code. This code is used to
authenticate the requests created by mod-c-requester. further details
are there in readme file.
Code is available at the same url,
http://utdallas.edu/~parinshah/mod-c-requester.0.2.tar.gz
Thanks,
Parin.
On 8/19/05, Pari
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:16:57AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Any reasonable place to put release notes like the following form?
>
> some compilers may not like C++ comments and fail to build, showing an
> error on line XXX of apr_dbd_internal.h; if that occurs, delete that line
> and
> r
I see a lot of frustration going on. The thing is, httpd's
development process is nearly identical to Subversion's process... we
stole most of it from you folks! So why all the angst in httpd-land,
but not in Subversion-land?
I see two differences:
(A) New trunk releases happen often. A
On 8/20/05, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bundled with APR & APR-Util 1.2.1:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.7/
>
> Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.7 as beta.
Any reasonable place to put release notes like the following form?
some compilers may not like C++ c
+1 NetWare
Brad
>>> On Saturday, August 20, 2005 at 1:27:00 pm, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bundled with APR & APR-Util 1.2.1:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.7/
>
> Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.7 as beta.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Paul
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:52:38PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> With the FC4 2.6.12-ish kernel I am seeing:
>
> - stuff sent by httpd fails to cork properly; partial frames are sent
> ... i.e. what Greg reported.
>
> - stuff sent by your test case *does* get corked properly; the partial
> header
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:25:19PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> I've attached my test program in case it's useful to others. It's
> run as
> sendfile_test [--cork] [--nodelay] [--nonblock] filename
> listener_port_number.
This is rather useful, thanks Brian.
I think you're missing the fact t
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:58:00AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sunday 21 August 2005 03:51, Nick Kew wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 August 2005 20:27, Paul Querna wrote:
> > > Bundled with APR & APR-Util 1.2.1:
>
> Oh, and, erm, _surely_ it must be time to unbundle those,
> along with some of the other
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:27:00PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> Bundled with APR & APR-Util 1.2.1:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.7/
>
> Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.7 as beta.
Looks good from manual install and httpd-test run on:
PASS: RHEL4/i686 RHEL3/i686 RHEL4/i686
Hello,
thanks for your reply. I've tried to change the code of mod_status
(modules/generators/mod_status.c), but it does not work.
I have no problem changing the code, but I don't know where to change it.
I've searched the source documentation of Apache, but it is not described
how to display such
43 matches
Mail list logo
