I'd like to propose we make two changes on Win32.
1st; deprecate the Win32DisableAcceptEx directive (axe it entirely from
trunk), and change the default to..
AcceptFilter none
with options of
AcceptFilter ex
AcceptFilter data
Either form will trigger the AcceptEx code path, the later
Hi,
back in october I submitted several patches to mod_proxy to address
some issues I had. At the time I was asked to resubmit my patched
against trunk instead of branch 2.2. I did not find the time then to
redo the work but at last I've been able to dedicate some time to this
task.
Included in
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:21 +0100, Mathias Herberts wrote:
Hi,
back in october I submitted several patches to mod_proxy to address
some issues I had. At the time I was asked to resubmit my patched
against trunk instead of branch 2.2. I did not find the time then to
redo the work but at last
On 3/16/07, Jean-Frederic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
* forceclose.patch
This patch adds a worker option 'forceclose' which can be set to 'On'
or 'Off' and which specifies if the backend connection should be
closed upon request completion.
Being able to force the closing of a
Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Thanks for the patch. I'll take a look (and review the history
of the enhancement request)!
Sander has reviewed and approved my revised patch for
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31268 (ab: add an
option to override the target host). Please
Mathias Herberts wrote:
The 'forceclose' patch will ensure that this situation will never
happen as the Cmax connections will not be kept idle. It will have a
slight performance penalty but that's better than a total inability to
serve requests (which should only happen when T0 is really
Nope - it won't. Where does z/OS define the crypt() prototype?
The correct patch is to ask APR_HAS_CRYPT (which we need to provide
by patching apr, if we don't already.)
If APR didn't detect crypt, adding crypt() style p/w's to htdbm,
htpasswd etc will still be a noop.
Bill
David Jones wrote:
On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope - it won't. Where does z/OS define the crypt() prototype?
unistd.h is the common place, z/OS or not.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/crypt.html
Apparently crypt_r() is often defined in crypt.h but not in
Jeff Trawick wrote:
APR doesn't pretend to figure out for APR apps exactly what the system
provides, though there is currently a spotty set of APR_HAS_foo.
Meanwhile, httpd goes and searches on its own for things APR doesn't
tell anyone about. I'm curious about other opinions on whether
On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
APR doesn't pretend to figure out for APR apps exactly what the system
provides, though there is currently a spotty set of APR_HAS_foo.
Meanwhile, httpd goes and searches on its own for things APR doesn't
tell
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to propose we ship apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release. Couple of notes...
Did anyone else have feedback on the comments/notes? I know Roy's made some
additional progress with the notification
Marc Stern wrote:
For info, I developed for the Belgian government, a reverse proxy
installation script (Unix/Windows) that encompasses a certificate
creation, and its registration in the config file. This uses gawk.
It is available on
Sander Temme wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Don't know about the shm session cache. Otherwise, the quotation issues
are fairly minor. I see that in trunk on unix we quote paths, and in
extra/httpd-ssl.conf we don't. Time to rigorously quote every path in
http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html
How does this look? Anything missed out, anything that doesn't make
sense? I think this covers most of the major problems in output filters
which keep coming up.
I'd also like to add a simple buffering filter which does things right
and
On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to propose we ship apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-
openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release. Couple of notes...
Did anyone else have feedback on the comments/notes? I know Roy's
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to propose we ship
apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release. Couple of notes...
Did anyone else have feedback on the
On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:55 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Working on this as we speak. I'll go over all of
trunk/docs/conf/extra/*.conf.in, then propose the backport.
Good catches; in the meantime - we'll let the user fix their config
for
the remaining (hopefully short) life of 2.2.4 and
17 matches
Mail list logo
