Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>>> I'd like to propose we ship >>>> apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with >>>> this release. Couple of notes... >>> >>> Did anyone else have feedback on the comments/notes? I know Roy's >>> made some >>> additional progress with the notification requirements, and would >>> like to be >>> ready when he shares word that httpd and openssl notices are all in >>> order. >> >> I'll take this as a resounding no, and that the draft package is >> sufficient. Moving it within 24 hrs unless I hear a specific >> technical objection. > > I think, if you mean "is it okay to post 2.2.4 binaries containing > openssl?", then the answer is yes.
Correct - I meant 'are there any other feedbacks' and the quiet tells me nobody has anything to add. I believe you already confirmed we are solid on notifications (or I wouldn't have placed them up in /dev/dist/ for evaluation :) Bill
