On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:44:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Sep 3 05:44:06 2007
New Revision: 572298
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572298view=rev
Log:
2.2 and later will wait for this APR tag...
-apr_tag=1.2.9
-apu_tag=1.2.8
+
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:07:04PM +0300, Villem Alari wrote:
I have error and can't install Flood. Error is:
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc-g -
O2 -pipe -Wall -g -O2 -pthread-DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -
D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
On 04.09.2007, at 12:29, Martin Kraemer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:07:04PM +0300, Villem Alari wrote:
I have error and can't install Flood. Error is:
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc-
g -
O2 -pipe -Wall -g -O2 -pthread-DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:11:24PM +0300, Villem Alari wrote:
On 04.09.2007, at 12:29, Martin Kraemer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:07:04PM +0300, Villem Alari wrote:
I have error and can't install Flood. Error is:
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc-
g -
-Message d'origine-
De : Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 3 septembre 2007 14:56
À : dev@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
That's right. You can't really have a connection pool if the
endpoint is unknown or changing
On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Envoyé : mardi 4 septembre 2007 14:19
À : dev@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
I will create a Bugzilla report for this
On 09/03/2007 11:40 PM, Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
Ruedinger:
In your patch, I think the call PROXY_WORKER_IS_INITIALIZED(workers)
before initialize the pointer *workers is causing that error log:
[Mon Sep 03 18:32:34 2007] [notice] child pid 5225 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
I don't know why, but each time a new child is created the variable
worker_is_initialized is 0.
Therefore, the problem of reseting to the original configuration is not solved.
I'm debugging more on this...
On 04/09/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/03/2007 11:40 PM, Vinicius
On Sep 4, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With the tagging (but not yet release) of the latest
rev's of apr/apu, I plan on tagging all 3 flavors of httpd
today (1.3.39, 2.0.61 and 2.2.6).
1.3.39 is tagged and rolled, but not yet available for
test. TR for 2.x will be a bit later on,
Hi,
As I said before, your last patch didn't solve the bug because the
variable you created (worker_is_initialized) always gets zero value.
I've created the patches attached. The solution was to simply move the
code section that set lbfactor, lbstatus, and lbset to the original
configuration
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Sept 7, unless otherwise noted...
+/-1 (x == +1)
[ ]apache_1.3.39
[
Dear Experts,
According to the mod_proxy docs, parameters to ProxyPass include:
smax max Upto the Soft Maximum number of connections will be
created on demand.
Any connections above smax are subject to a time to live
or ttl.
So, am I allowed to set smax=0 ? In my case,
On 9/4/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Sept 7, unless otherwise
On 04.09.2007, at 23:29, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Sept 7, unless otherwise noted...
Erik Abele wrote:
On 04.09.2007, at 23:29, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
[ ]apache_1.3.39
-0.1
The tarball apache_1.3.39.tar.gz explodes into apache-1.3/, which
isn't
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though, I'm +1 on keeping
as is... we can document this. Or, we could *gasp* just reroll :/
Or we can repack the same files. This is a packaging artifact, not
an artifact of source control.
Bill
On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though, I'm +1 on keeping
as is... we can document this. Or, we could *gasp* just reroll :/
Or we can repack the same files. This is a packaging artifact, not
an artifact of
I've written an extension/hack for mod_dav. I would like to know if it
would be useful to others and how I might change it to be more portable?
The hack hooks the code to store, copy, rename, and remove files.
It creates a string representing the operation and the path elements,
and writes the
19 matches
Mail list logo
