On 09 Nov 2011, at 1:52 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
One thing I know for certain that does not fall in line with this is
if some.where.back.there and some.where.different are signed out of
the
same CA, but you wish to send different client certs based on path
(such
a use case exists, silly
Hi all,
We have just witnessed a memory leak in the case of Apache 2.2.16 with
WinOpenSSL running on Windows when downloading a file that is served from the
disk via the AliasMatch directive and does not reside in the cache but is
configured as cacheable.
In this case, we see that the child
I don't think that this has something to do with AliasMatch. Most likely this
is caused by reading the file that should be delivered into some request pool
backed
memory in order to write it to the cache. If you don't cache the file it is
probably not read by httpd but transported via a
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or less will be 2.4.0 GA!!
Vote will last the
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key expired last Friday?
% gpg --verify ../incoming/httpd/trunk/2.3.15/httpd-2.3.15-beta.tar.gz.asc
gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
gpg: Signature made November 9, 2011 3:20:26 PM CET using RSA
On 08.11.2011 13:57, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Rainer Jung wrote:
After Stefan's change r1199027 we no longer load all built modules by
default. The new behaviour is (citing Stefan):
By default, only load those modules that are either required
or explicitly selected by a
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key expired last Friday?
Oups, was so convinced it is new, that I didn't see it already expired a
year ago. Maybe you should sign 2.4.0 with a new one?
Rainer
% gpg --verify
Devs,
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
Only, this is on the bleeding edge beta posted today, and hits
Unix (particularly with our
Your hypothesis sounds reasonable to me that has to do with memory that should
be written to the cache, but the question pertains why this memory is not freed
once the file is written to the cache?
Ofer Israeli
Team Leader, Endpoint Security Management
Check Point Software
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key expired last Friday?
Oups, was so convinced it is new, that I didn't see it
Bring it (the key) tonight :)
On 09/11/2011 11:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it looks like your key
Already sent to ST yesterday…
On Nov 9, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Bring it (the key) tonight :)
On 09/11/2011 11:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer
On 09.11.2011 11:12, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2010-11-04 is the day I created the new key… it's unexpired
(at least from what I can see ;) )
Sorry for the noise, false alarm :(
Regards,
Rainer
On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.11.2011 07:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jim,
it
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
Only, this is on the bleeding edge beta
On 09 Nov 2011, at 11:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I talked with Rainer about this and we came to the conclusion, that
we simply should keep non-default modules commented out, even if
they have been explicitly enabled with --enable-foo. This has also
the advantage that it is more likely
testing 2.3.15 on AIX, I found every module commented out.
http://people.apache.org/~covener/config.log
CC=xlc_r -q64; export CC
./configure \
--prefix=/tmp/httpd-2.3.15-beta/built \
--enable-ldap \
--with-ldap=ibmldap \
(but maybe I've misunderstood the change -- doing my homework)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
testing 2.3.15 on AIX, I found every module commented out.
http://people.apache.org/~covener/config.log
CC=xlc_r -q64; export CC
./configure \
Am 09.11.2011 15:24, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The 2.3.15-beta (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-beta BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
On 09.11.2011 13:53, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
On 11/9/2011 3:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency failure between proxy_balancer and slotmem
providers.
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely
I believe Eric added some SSL stuff to mod_lua, and this now causes at 1st
glance that it doesnt compile at least for NetWare, and most likely also not
for Windows (static makefiles need to be fixed); but in addition I think we
need to make this SSL stuff optional so that its possible to build
Am 10.11.2011 00:09, schrieb Eric Covener:
I believe Eric added some SSL stuff to mod_lua, and this now causes at 1st
glance that it doesnt compile at least for NetWare, and most likely also not
for Windows (static makefiles need to be fixed); but in addition I think we
need to make this SSL
Am 10.11.2011 00:11, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
I didnt yet look self closer at it - just got the problem reported ...
so I guess mod_lua doesnt use OpenSSL functions, and therefore doesnt
link against OpenSSL, and loads runs still fine without mod_ssl loaded?
ok, adding include path seems to be
On 08.11.2011 13:10, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- Rainer wanted to check some pcre linking issues, but I don't remember
the exact details
The problem is mainly gone with trunk. It concerns dependency libs,
which are likely used by 3rd-party modules as well. Until 2.2 PCRE was
such a library
On 09.11.2011 14:48, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 3:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This one in from the users@ list. It sounds vaguely familiar
to the issue previously mentioned about win32 defaults and some
strange dependency
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote:
On 30.09.2011 08:08, Paul Querna wrote:
Attached is a patch
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/tls_session_ticket_support.patch
to add support for setting SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_ticket_keys.
I have two questions:
1)
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:01:07 +
Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:10:06 +0100 (CET)
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
yesterday at the Dover Arms pub, we discussed what needs to be done for
2.4 and we came up with a list of things that would be
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Test Summary Report
---
t/modules/cgi.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 53 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 58 tests but ran 53.
t/modules/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 15 Failed: 2)
Failed
On 11/9/2011 4:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
Reporter suggests that *NOT* loading mod_slotmem_shm caused the server
to start correctly; exactly the inverse of what we
On 09.11.2011 21:20, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 4:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Isn't the point different? If someone enables mod_proxy then the
configure script needs to ensure that mod_slotmem is also built…
Reporter suggests that *NOT* loading mod_slotmem_shm caused the server
On 11/10/2011 1:08 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
No, his subject is module proxy_balancer requires the not automatically loaded
module
slotmem_shm (the not and not to not) and he writes
Ok, so I simply removed in the installed default httpd.conf the comment sign
within the line
#LoadModule
33 matches
Mail list logo
