Re: Question about RemoteIPInternalProxyList (PR 62220)

2018-04-06 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Asking me to ask myself why I did what I did 10 years ago :) Best explanation I have is that I'd envisioned that the internal and external trust lists would be universally accepted lists, and they are *very* slow to parse with DNS lookups. E.g. the wikipedia X-F-F whitelist. And a corporate

Re: Question about RemoteIPInternalProxyList (PR 62220)

2018-04-06 Thread Marion et Christophe JAILLET
Le 06/04/2018 à 20:23, Eric Covener a écrit : On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Christophe Jaillet wrote: Hi list, I'm working on PR 62220 and I don't understand what could cause the reported regression. Apparently the behavior of RemoteIPInternalProxyList has

Re: Question about RemoteIPInternalProxyList (PR 62220)

2018-04-06 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Christophe Jaillet wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm working on PR 62220 and I don't understand what could cause the reported > regression. > > Apparently the behavior of RemoteIPInternalProxyList has changed in 2.4.33. > But

Question about RemoteIPInternalProxyList (PR 62220)

2018-04-06 Thread Christophe Jaillet
Hi list, I'm working on PR 62220 and I don't understand what could cause the reported regression. Apparently the behavior of RemoteIPInternalProxyList has changed in 2.4.33. But RemoteIPInternalProxy (without List) still works as expected. Looking at the implementation of the 2 directives,