On Mon, 2006-09-10 at 09:24 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 09 October 2006 07:53, Boyle Owen wrote:
Hi all,
Speaking as an apache user (not developer) who merely lurks on this
list, is it appropriate for me to question the formatting (and hence
usefulness) of this periodic report?
On Wed, 2006-11-10 at 13:51 +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
Sometimes I need to kill an apache child process serving large file
before
request is completed. I run kill -SIGTERM HTTPD_PID, the child dies
and
transfer is stopped but nothing is written in access log.
I don't know the answer
On Fri, 2006-27-10 at 23:33 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Different VHosts meaning different URLs/directories, pointing to
the
same files...
Hmm... Two thoughts come into my head over this one.
One way to approach this is to treat this as a general problem of how
do
we stop people
On Mon, 2006-13-11 at 22:54 +0100, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 21:39 +0100 schrieb Toni Pizà:
I will try to read the code of mod_php in ordrer to understand how the
CGI relates the server web and the php interpreter!
If you want to look at a webservers source code to
On Wed, 2006-13-12 at 13:16 +0100, Paul Fee wrote:
This is a problem for me as the install location is not always known
at build time. Also, if I give someone a built version of httpd, they
can not install it multiple times on one host due to the absolute
paths.
Why do they need more than
On Wed, 2006-13-12 at 17:30 +0100, Paul Fee wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Why do they need more than one ?
snip
Hi Guy,
The main motivation is that I don't want to dictate install location to
people that are using
my builds of httpd
On Tue, 2007-09-01 at 13:40 +, 张 臻博 wrote:
hello
I am reading the code of apache. Is there anybody who knows whether
ap_run_pre_connection() and ap_run_process_connection() are functions or
macro? and where is the definition for those two , as i can not find any
detailed code for
On Tue, 2007-09-01 at 14:03 +, 张 臻博 wrote:
hi,
Acturally, from APR, you can not find any hint for those two. As you search
from this place: http://docx.itscales.com/annotated.html you can not find
the link for those two anyone knows where can find the source code or
some
I'm looking at perchild with the aim of getting it working.
In STATUS I see:
Get perchild to work on platforms other than Linux. This will require a
portable mechanism to pass data and file/socket descriptors between
vhost child groups.
But I am lead to believe (from the users list) that it
On Sun, 2006-09-07 at 19:30 -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
I'm looking at perchild with the aim of getting it working.
snip
Yes. It could be broken on linux and all other platforms.
If someone else is working on it then I will focus on testing it.
No one is working
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-17-07 at 20:07 -0400, sarvothaman vittal wrote:
snip
--gh
Sridevi.
This is entirely the wrong place to post this.
This is what you want:
http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
Here is the central page which describes which lists to use:
http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html
If you speak better German than English, there is a German version of
the
I don't think I'm eligible to vote but I would point out that in the
third name the 'd' in 'httpd' is redundant if you append 'Server'.
On Sat, 2006-29-07 at 13:54 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] httpd
[ ] Apache httpd
[ ] Apache httpd Server
[ ] Apache HTTP Server
[ ]
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 10:08 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm trying to figure out which impl of the the
LB cluster set makes the most sense and would appreciate
the feedback.
snip
Comments?
Are you implementing load balancing/clustering in Apache HTTP Server ?
Why ?
--
--gh
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 11:18 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Why ?
People want it.
Thought so :-(
--
--gh
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 16:54 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Why ?
Because it's useful?
Nope.
Load balancing really belongs at the network layer.
IBM released free load-balancing software for linux and windows about
1997. My former employer's integration group (about 3 people) got a
fully
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 17:42 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Mon, July 31, 2006 5:32 pm, Guy Hulbert wrote:
People want it.
Thought so :-(
Why the :-(...?
httpd tries to deliver what people will find useful, and load balancing is
a very useful part of a multi tier webserver
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 12:04 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Nope.
Load balancing really belongs at the network layer.
snip
But, I suppose, if people want it ...
People want to simplify things.
The simple solution is to buy a bigger piece of hardware or outsource
the problem to the
/clustering to software projects seems to be
popular (i know of others :-) lately ... it seems like the idea that
every end-user application adds features until it can do email.
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 18:26 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Mon, July 31, 2006 6:16 pm, Guy Hulbert wrote:
At the network
I didn't read this very carefully.
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 18:26 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
I'm sure they can. This doesn't make them the right solution for all
cases.
In a multi tier architecture, you already have front end servers
implementing URL strategies, common logging, all sorts of
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 18:31 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
I get the sense that you would rather the developers scratch your itch
Their itch is not a problem for me ... and it isn't something I would
necessarily use apache for ... though for a small to medium scale setup
it might be very useful.
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 12:50 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
My only interest in this is you are putting all the additional
complexity into the Apache server.
Considering the very common usage of Apache being used as
a reverse proxy and the need for URL-specific forwarding,
adding a
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 17:30 +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Either way, the more options and the more flexibility, the better.
This is not true. There is always a limit. The difficult part is to
know when you've reached it, of course.
Also, it is a design choice. For example, perl (TMOWTDI)
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 19:00 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Mon, July 31, 2006 6:39 pm, Guy Hulbert wrote:
I already accept that this seems to fait-accomplis. So I am just
arguing for entertainment purposes.
Which in turn means you're just wasting people's time.
It's your choice
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 13:05 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
One reason for a generic scoreboard would be to help make
perchild easier, since we could store the passed fd's in this
location alleviating some of the current problems.
Thanks.
I've seen all the traffic on the scoreboard and this is
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 13:21 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
I've seen all the traffic on the scoreboard and this is very useful
context ...
Also, I am using a similar scoreboard mechanism to collect lots of per
worker stats without the extendedstatus overhead.
I've been following discussion
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 19:34 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Mon, July 31, 2006 6:43 pm, Guy Hulbert wrote:
This seems reasonable. Given paragraph 2 (URL strategies etc) Not for
the reasons I've omitted (and responded to separately). However, I
still don't think this will scale the way
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 19:34 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Users of mod_backhand (for httpd v1.3) would disagree, it's a similar
Greenspun:
http://philip.greenspun.com/scratch/scaling.adp
Asks the right question:
How are load balancers actually built?
and suggests: zeus, mod_backhand,
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 13:54 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
That's the ultimate case, after all :-)
Not necessarily. Google's answer is to throw tons of hardware at
stuff.
The point of contention was scalability ... from a human point of view
it is really annoying to have
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 14:02 -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 7/31/06, Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 13:54 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
That's the ultimate case, after all :-)
Not necessarily. Google's answer is to throw tons of hardware
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 20:15 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
So in principle most can be done on both sides, but often it's the
experience of the people, that decides on where to actually build the
solution.
Yup.
I did both solutions successfully and even had companies move from on
to
the
FWIW, this seems much more likely:
http://www.ultramonkey.org/about.shtml
In particular:
http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/installation-debian.sarge.html
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 14:29 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
It seems that linux router is the wrong name. Here is the correct
project:
http
[ I had given up this thread but since I started it ... ]
Apart from minor details I agree with this comment anyway.
On Mon, 2006-07-08 at 13:48 +0200, Klaus Wagner wrote:
snip
on Cisco gear (and others) within about 6 months. I'm sure the price
for proprietary hardware has dropped
On Fri, 2006-11-08 at 13:15 +0200, Silvio Mazzaro wrote:
Hi all,
I'm searching for a method to track calls to other programs by Perl
Scripts (or other CGI) in a Virtual Host Environment.
What is the problem you are trying to solve ?
For example I'd like to know what script is calling
On Fri, 2006-11-08 at 09:47 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 8/11/06, Silvio Mazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
What is the problem you are trying to solve ?
I'd like to know who's using sendmail from the Web.
snip
Perhaps It is possible to track system calls from
On Sat, 2006-19-08 at 10:18 -0300, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Em 19/08/2006, às 07:55, Mladen Turk escreveu:
Hi,
Anyone knows how to detect the mpm used so that
module can be build with/without threading code
depending if the mpm is prefork or any other threaded
one like worker by using
On Sun, 2006-20-08 at 08:36 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
But why is there the Directive ScriptAlias?
-- This Directive should then better be removed.
It could easily be removed. It is a convenience directive for the
Not if you don't want to annoy your users ...
--
--gh
Hi all.
I am getting a little more serious about working on the perchild mpm.
Before I start, I would like some documentation at the level of the
example below but with a more global perspective.
If none exists, then I will put something together.
I understand there are lists for apr and for
On Wed, 2006-30-08 at 23:02 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-30-08 at 12:59 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at perchild with the aim of getting it working.
maybe you're
On Thu, 2006-31-08 at 13:37 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. I have the patch against 2.0.48 ... I will see what I can do with
it.
Yeah, it's quite old. But perhaps you can get it into current 2.2.
Please give us feedback.
It is not clear
On Thu, 2006-31-08 at 16:21 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It is not clear to me yet whether I should work on metux or perchild.
Unless I missed some major redesign in perchild, you should drop it.
It has some design flaws which make
41 matches
Mail list logo
